Skip to comments.
Court says it's unjust but deports man who lived with underage girl
San Francisco Chronicle ^
| 8/17/7
| Bob Egelko
Posted on 08/17/2007 8:09:21 AM PDT by SmithL
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
1
posted on
08/17/2007 8:09:25 AM PDT
by
SmithL
Thomas, Sidney Runyan
- Born 1953 in Bozeman, MT
Federal Judicial Service:
Judge, U. S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Nominated by William J. Clinton on July 19, 1995, to a seat vacated by Dorothy Wright Nelson; Confirmed by the Senate on January 2, 1996, and received commission on January 4, 1996.
Education:
Montana State University, B.A., 1975
University of Montana School of Law, J.D., 1978
Professional Career:
Legal intern, Hon. W.W. Lessley, Montana State District Court, 18th Judicial District
Private practice, Billings, Montana, 1978-1995
Adjunct instructor of law, Rocky Mountain College, Billings, Montana, 1982-1995
Race or Ethnicity: White
Gender: Male
Leighton, Ronald B.
- Born 1951 in Stockton, CA
Federal Judicial Service:
Judge, U. S. District Court, Western District of Washington
Nominated by George W. Bush on January 23, 2002, to a seat vacated by Robert J. Bryan; Confirmed by the Senate on November 14, 2002, and received commission on November 26, 2002.
Education:
Whitworth College, B.A., 1973
University of California, Hastings College of Law, J.D., 1976
Professional Career:
Private practice, Tacoma, Washington, 1976-2002
Race or Ethnicity: White
Gender: Male
2
posted on
08/17/2007 8:10:19 AM PDT
by
SmithL
(si vis pacem, para bellum)
To: SmithL
By all means. Meet with the full court so they can find an emanation from a penumbra or simply write new law like they usually do.
3
posted on
08/17/2007 8:12:30 AM PDT
by
Seruzawa
(Attila the Hun... wasn't he a liberal?)
To: SmithL
Now that we have the spin of the bay paper, does anyone have the real facts of the case. My opinion is load him up and ship him out, the kid and mother can go with him.
4
posted on
08/17/2007 8:13:08 AM PDT
by
org.whodat
(What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
To: SmithL
Why do I think that, if this was an illegal alien, he would be allowed to stay?
5
posted on
08/17/2007 8:14:32 AM PDT
by
UCFRoadWarrior
(FantasyCollegeBlitz.com)
To: org.whodat
Anytime the ninth circuit follows the law I am surprised!!!
6
posted on
08/17/2007 8:17:31 AM PDT
by
Roamin53
(World War III started on Bill Clinton's watch....he just wasn't sure which side he was on!)
To: SmithL
7
posted on
08/17/2007 8:20:50 AM PDT
by
Dante3
To: SmithL
Not only yeah, but HELL YEAH!
He’s 20. She’s 15 (though his lawyer says she was 16).
Hasta luego, Amigo!
8
posted on
08/17/2007 8:21:38 AM PDT
by
gridlock
(ELIMINATE PERVERSE INCENTIVES)
To: SmithL
Hmm, why can’t the court simply re-write the law like they usually do?
To: SmithL
interesting.....too bad this guy was a *legal resident (& so easily deport-able), as our gov’t usually *overlooks* many crimes of the illegals.
Why weren’t the girls parents charged for allowing a 15/16 year old girl to move in with her boyfriend ?? Also wondering how many welfare checks/gov’t freebies are involved in the saga.
10
posted on
08/17/2007 8:26:52 AM PDT
by
txdoda
(Voters to Gov't .......Re: post 9-11 Border Security....... ""The results are Unacceptable."")
To: org.whodat
Although Juan Estrada-Espinoza's relationship with his girlfriend was consensualFrom court decision: "charging him with being removable as an alien convicted of an aggravated felony. DHS based this charge on state statutory rape convictions stemming from Estrada-Espinozas relationship with his younger girlfriend. In June 2001, Estrada-Espinoza met Sonia Arredondo. At the time of their meeting, Estrada-Espinoza was 20 years old and Arredondo was either 15 or 16 years old."
So it would appear that she also was an illegal and the conviction would never have taken place if someone did not file a complaint, so there goes the old consensual.
11
posted on
08/17/2007 8:28:11 AM PDT
by
org.whodat
(What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
To: SmithL
12
posted on
08/17/2007 8:34:53 AM PDT
by
NRA1995
(To Congress and Mr. President: This is OUR country, and don't you forget it!)
Comment #13 Removed by Moderator
To: SmithL
So now “Romeo & Juliet” exceptions to the age of consent law are being broadened to extend to a 4 year difference (when the girl is 2 years under majority and the male 2 years over?)???
Slippery slope.
It was NOT a consenting relationship. She was unable under the law to GIVE consent.
14
posted on
08/17/2007 8:37:09 AM PDT
by
weegee
(NO THIRD TERM. America does not need another unconstitutional Clinton co-presidency.)
To: gridlock
Maybe he should’ve stolen the identity of someone who was 17. There’s little to no prosecution for identity theft.
15
posted on
08/17/2007 8:38:10 AM PDT
by
weegee
(NO THIRD TERM. America does not need another unconstitutional Clinton co-presidency.)
To: Seruzawa
find an emanation from a penumbra = HALLUCINATION
16
posted on
08/17/2007 8:43:01 AM PDT
by
MrB
(You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
To: SmithL
So now they’re 26 and 22 and still not married ?
17
posted on
08/17/2007 8:46:14 AM PDT
by
cinives
(On some planets what I do is considered normal.)
To: Always Right
There certainly was an undercurrent of desire to do that on the part of the majority.
Now whether that came from their own ambitions (or experience) regarding 15 year old girls, or their legal training, we may never know.
Still, it's remarkably cold of the judges to personally dismiss the welfare of the teenage girl so easily. She must have been of Mexican origin herself for that to have happened.
18
posted on
08/17/2007 9:02:39 AM PDT
by
muawiyah
To: Shuck04
I agree. Why break up the family?
19
posted on
08/17/2007 9:20:07 AM PDT
by
stuartcr
(Everything happens as God wants it to.....otherwise, things would be different.)
To: org.whodat
No can do.
>Estrada, 26, who lived in Jackson (Amador County) with his girlfriend and their son...<-THE ANCHOR BABY.
20
posted on
08/17/2007 9:57:13 AM PDT
by
B4Ranch
( "Freedom is not free, but don't worry the U.S. Marine Corps will pay most of your share.")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson