Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

British forces useless in Basra, say officials
Sunday Telegraph ^ | 8/19/2007 | Tim Shipman

Posted on 08/19/2007 5:35:20 PM PDT by bruinbirdman

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last

1 posted on 08/19/2007 5:35:23 PM PDT by bruinbirdman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

Thanks Brits. Absolutely no class. Just leave it to the good old US - again.


2 posted on 08/19/2007 5:39:45 PM PDT by golfisnr1 (Democrats are like roaches - hard to get rid of.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: golfisnr1

The British government has its hands full at home, what with a growing Muslim constituency to appease /s


3 posted on 08/19/2007 5:44:54 PM PDT by mrsmel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: golfisnr1

>> he would stick to plans which could see most of Britain’s 5,500 troops gone from Iraq next year.

Take the losers out now, Gordie.


4 posted on 08/19/2007 5:46:27 PM PDT by Nervous Tick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick
Take the losers out now, Gordie.

Ain't the troops as usual just like our Vietnam it is the politicians
5 posted on 08/19/2007 5:48:36 PM PDT by uncbob (m first)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mrsmel
The British government has its hands full at home, what with a growing Muslim constituency to appease /s

Ain't the muslims
They are in the minority

It is the population in general

We have the same problem here
6 posted on 08/19/2007 5:50:26 PM PDT by uncbob (m first)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: uncbob

>> Ain’t the troops as usual just like our Vietnam it is the politicians

You’re undoubtedly correct. Although I have to point out, the behavior of the dozen or so Brits that were taken at sea by the Iranians were a huge disappointment, as was the behavior of the British command all the way up the chain.


7 posted on 08/19/2007 5:52:53 PM PDT by Nervous Tick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

The Brits aren’t making anything positive, so get their butts out now. Change of policy is long overdue, damn the Chinese and take out Iran.


8 posted on 08/19/2007 5:57:53 PM PDT by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists...call 'em what you will...They ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman
My gracious, the Times has certainly fired all its guns this weekend, hasn't it? And all of them seem directed on the U.S./U.K. relationship. I would be the last to suggest an ulterior motive - well, actually, no, I'm suggesting it now - but it seems that the editorial board of the Times has decided to promote a parting of the ways and a closer British approach to You Know Who across the channel in Brussels.

There is and always will be a certain friction between military men of different nations attempting to approach a common end, and always the journalists covering it will tend to misinterpret statements made by the sundry parties involved.

But one thing is certain - the British troops (God bless 'em) are going to leave and the U.S. troops take over. What happens after that will not really test the applicability of British lessons in Northern Ireland, because the situation is far different at this point from the former or even from Basra itself three years ago. At this point all the community involvement in the world won't disarm the militias or soothe the trouble the Iranians have been merrily stirring up. Nice will have to be accompanied with not-nice, and it will be.

That said, I am very disappointed in this crude attempt at agitprop from the Times. The British troops deserve better. IMHO.

9 posted on 08/19/2007 6:10:16 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: golfisnr1
Thanks Brits. Absolutely no class.

I feel for the troops, nothing more than the pawns of the democrats, I mean,the British Parliament........

10 posted on 08/19/2007 6:17:58 PM PDT by Hot Tabasco (Farewell Turd Blossom, ya done good!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill
At this point all the community involvement in the world won't disarm the militias or soothe the trouble the Iranians have been merrily stirring up. Nice will have to be accompanied with not-nice, and it will be.

Question is what can we do and will we
11 posted on 08/19/2007 6:24:09 PM PDT by uncbob (m first)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill
That said, I am very disappointed in this crude attempt at agitprop from the Times.

So there isn't a problem in Basra ?
12 posted on 08/19/2007 6:25:35 PM PDT by uncbob (m first)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: uncbob
So there isn't a problem in Basra?

Oh, I think there is. Don't you?

It's simply a different problem from that of Northern Ireland, although at one point the two may have seemed similar. This is pure state-supported terror through proxy organizations and all of the fingers point to Iran. Northern Ireland wasn't that (unless you count the state of Massachusetts). The Brits were applying the right lessons to the wrong situation, IMHO.

I feel a little guilty even saying that. Even the guy with the wrong opinion out there has a better look at it than I do. But that's the way it seems from here.

13 posted on 08/19/2007 6:34:59 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill

Your implication was that it was Agiprop


14 posted on 08/19/2007 6:52:11 PM PDT by uncbob (m first)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: uncbob
It is agitprop. It's propaganda designed to agitate, to cause heightened emotions, specifically between the U.K. and the U.S. I'm accusing the Times of putting out an issue that was deliberately designed to accentuate hard feelings between the two countries in an effort to swing the opinions of the respective parties away from one another.

This would be forgivable were we not involved in a shooting war. As it is, I strongly believe there ought to be some guilty consciences on that editorial board for delivering such a biased, inflammatory point of view. Did you catch one of the other columns in the same issue, with the headline "General Betreaus"? Betray Us. Cute. Not real subtle, that...

15 posted on 08/19/2007 6:58:20 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

Ah yes, the Brit’s “hands off” policy in Basra, which they lorded over the US “cowboys,” who had the unmitigated gall to actually shoot at people.


16 posted on 08/19/2007 7:01:43 PM PDT by Trailerpark Badass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mrsmel

The end of a partnership that began in August, 1941, when Britain was on the ropes.


17 posted on 08/19/2007 7:06:21 PM PDT by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: golfisnr1

The U.K. troops are good, it’s the Home Office and their directions to the British generals in Iraq to keep down losses and do the hand over that’s the problem. When small units such as reported on by some of our embedded bloggers are allowed to be proactive, the British Army does well.


18 posted on 08/19/2007 7:43:49 PM PDT by RicocheT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: golfisnr1
Thanks Brits. Absolutely no class. Just leave it to the good old US - again.

Brit troops are at the mercy of their leaders Such a blanket statement shows it's you that has no class.

19 posted on 08/19/2007 8:26:38 PM PDT by ARE SOLE (Agents Ramos and Campean are in prison at this very moment..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman; golfisnr1; mrsmel; Nervous Tick; uncbob; rockinqsranch; Billthedrill; Hot Tabasco; ...
I picked up this after-action report from the Iraqi Sunni Resistance on 110807: The al-Qurnah area N of al-Basrah saw fierce fighting between the Bani Malik and al-Furayjat tribes following the killing of Wisam Sabah ‘Irmish, 20, the son of Shaykh of the Bani Malik on 100807.

5 people were killed, 20 wounded

The Bani Malik blamed the al-Furajat and the Bani Malik attacked the headquarters of the Islamic Da‘wah Party, the Shia party of which Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki, is a leader.

The Bani Malik also attacked the offices of the Movement of the Lord of the Islamic Martyrs, an organization run by the Supreme Islamic Iraqi Council, the Shia faction run by ‘Abd al-‘Aziz al-Hakim of the 30,000-man Badr Brigade. Guards at the two party headquarters left their posts and fled the scene as did the police.

British and other security forces did not intervene to stop the attacks and neither did the British attack helicopters that over flew the area.

The Bani Malik tribal fighters set up road blocks along the highway from al-Qurnah to al-Basrah, a road linking al-Basrah with the rest of the country, effectively cut the southern city off from the rest of the country.

Tribal fighting is a frequent occurrence in the area north of al-Basrah and that the city is often isolated from the rest of the country when the tribes in the largely Shia region take up arms against each other.

20 posted on 08/19/2007 9:23:00 PM PDT by gandalftb (mps)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson