1 posted on
08/30/2007 1:42:13 PM PDT by
SmithL
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
To: SmithL
Today...tomorrow...Sept 6th
2 posted on
08/30/2007 1:43:25 PM PDT by
Puppage
(You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
To: SmithL
3 posted on
08/30/2007 1:44:00 PM PDT by
pcottraux
(Fred Thompson pronounces it "P. Coe-troe"...in 2008.)
To: SmithL
I hope Fred Thompson understands this one thing... nobody likes a tease.
4 posted on
08/30/2007 1:44:11 PM PDT by
pnh102
To: SmithL
I think so far today I have heard three different places where Fred Thompson will announce his candidacy. Yawwwnnn...call me when it is over. I have work to do.
5 posted on
08/30/2007 1:44:27 PM PDT by
cubreporter
( Rush has done more for our country from where he sits than anyone will ever know.)
To: SmithL
6 posted on
08/30/2007 1:45:03 PM PDT by
boomop1
(there you go again)
To: SmithL; monkapotamus; All
HEY MONK I am not suprise if he announced on Jay Leno remember what on NBC Law and Order his boss for last few years
7 posted on
08/30/2007 1:45:05 PM PDT by
SevenofNine
("We are Freepers, all your media belong to us, resistence is futile")
To: SmithL
He "waited" until the date that, in the past, candidates would announce their intentions to run for POTUS.
11 posted on
08/30/2007 1:51:54 PM PDT by
Edgerunner
(If you won't let the military fight your battles, you will have to. Keep your powder dry...)
To: SmithL
I think Fred
may be my choice, but until I hear him I'm not sending him a dime.
Come on Fred, #$%# or get off the pot.
23 posted on
08/30/2007 2:16:08 PM PDT by
Vinnie
(You're Nobody 'Til Somebody Jihads You)
To: SmithL
25 posted on
08/30/2007 2:16:40 PM PDT by
freekitty
(May the eagles long fly over our beautiful and free American sky.)
To: SmithL
They have yet to invent an instrument that can measure my indifference to this whole Fred thing.
27 posted on
08/30/2007 2:20:03 PM PDT by
swilliams53
(In case someone cares; yet, somehow we do!)
To: SmithL
Where are all the idiots that said last month was already too late?
As if any politically astute campaign would make their splash the last week of summer, before a long weekend, when not a soul other than truthers are paying any attention to the race.
32 posted on
08/30/2007 2:23:58 PM PDT by
sam_paine
(X .................................)
To: SmithL
Jeez. 30+ posts and mostly a buncha whining crybabies.
33 posted on
08/30/2007 2:26:12 PM PDT by
Reagan Man
(FUHGETTABOUTIT Rudy....... Conservatives don't vote for liberals!)
To: SmithL
More feet-staming demands from the anti-Fred trolls. They aren’t missing a thread anymore, LOL!
43 posted on
08/30/2007 2:45:08 PM PDT by
prairiebreeze
(PUT AMERICA AHEAD! VOTE FOR FRED!!)
To: SmithL
Thompson to Announce Bid Sept. 6
and be in a debate in late September? First polls in October ought to be interesting.
44 posted on
08/30/2007 2:45:38 PM PDT by
Grunthor
(Wine is constant proof that God loves us and loves to see us happy)
To: SmithL
Woohoo!
Fred Thompson ‘08! =)
To: SmithL
You know what I think is very interesting.
Here is THE BIG NEWS about the Messiah getting into the race and after three hours of being on the Breaking News Sidebar it has only garnered 73 responses. And a good chunk of those are not positive or complete boredom.
74 posted on
08/30/2007 4:35:40 PM PDT by
elizabetty
(Was it Dolley Madison or Dolli Madison? First Ladies should not end their name with "I")
To: SmithL; be-baw; Anti-Bubba182; Orange1998
Personally I think this is a very smart move by Fred and his team.
Let the other candidates wear each other down, let them attack each other and let the stronger ones weed out the weaker ones.
By the time he does enter his first debate, the field should be much smaller and so he will get more attention and more air time (with less time to make mistakes).
Besides, Fred will probably get more public attention by appearing on Leno. Im just guessing, but I think Leno will probably get higher ratings with Fred than a Republican debate would with or without him. Plus in that more casual setting, sitting down as a Hollywood person with another Hollywood person, he will appear more affable and appealing to more Americans that the stiff debaters of either party, standing behind podiums trying answer questions by regurgitating campaign sound bites instead of honestly answering the questions. But I think once he does enter a debate, given his comfort with being in front of the camera, hell clean the other candidates clocks, if not on substance then certainly on delivery.
Hes been running an exploratory campaign that allowed him to raise money, he has had time to garner support before the official announcement and since hes not been an official candidate, he was able to get his message out via blogs and op-ed pieces without entering the fray and having to do the State Fair Hot Dog Eating - Baby Kissing silliness the other candidates did.
By entering the race and the debates late, he doesnt have to respond to the fringe candidates and he can position himself as the outsider candidate and with the all time low approval ratings that Congress and most other politicos have, its the smart thing to do.
82 posted on
08/30/2007 5:29:39 PM PDT by
Caramelgal
(Rely on the spirit and meaning of the teachings, not on the words or superficial interpretations)
To: SmithL
84 posted on
08/30/2007 5:35:04 PM PDT by
davidlachnicht
("IF WE'RE ALL TO BE TARGETS, THEN WE ALL MUST BE SOLDIERS.")
To: SmithL
An announcement to come out from behind Hannity’s skirt....how quaint.
87 posted on
08/30/2007 5:47:59 PM PDT by
RasterMaster
(Rudy McRomneyson = KENNEDY wing of the Republican Party)
To: SmithL
OK FRED...
GIT 'ER DONE!
89 posted on
08/30/2007 6:13:35 PM PDT by
JOE6PAK
(blithering intellectual.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson