1 posted on
09/12/2007 10:40:41 AM PDT by
qam1
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-38 last
To: qam1
The climate is changing.
Always. Constantly.
It’s the natural cycle.
22 posted on
09/12/2007 10:53:55 AM PDT by
TBP
To: qam1
Get some flood insurance.
24 posted on
09/12/2007 10:55:27 AM PDT by
Paladin2
(Islam is the religion of violins, NOT peas.)
To: qam1
Hillary!08 said Change is good.
25 posted on
09/12/2007 10:56:10 AM PDT by
RightWhale
(Stop Change while it is perfect.)
To: qam1
This is a case of when you get saturated with enough BS you no longer smell it.
Its hard to get excited about something you hear or read about everyday. After a while it gets old and boring. The Global warming nut cases have overplayed their hands and now the general public is no longer interested.
26 posted on
09/12/2007 10:56:50 AM PDT by
darkwing104
(Let's get dangerous)
To: qam1
Factor in the effect of spring tides on top of a higher sea level, or a major hurricane-generated tidal surge as experienced with Ivan and we will be looking at some very serious problems here.
To: qam1
Someone should ask them why the Vikings named it “Greenland.”
34 posted on
09/12/2007 11:04:30 AM PDT by
FormerLib
(Sacrificing our land and our blood cannot buy protection from jihad.-Bishop Artemije of Kosovo)
To: qam1
36 posted on
09/12/2007 11:05:30 AM PDT by
NRA1995
(To Congress and Mr. President: This is OUR country, and don't you forget it!)
To: qam1
I'm not paying attention to fractional temperature changes that shift from year to year, but yes, I'm paying attention to the Watermelon crowd.
I know what they're up to.
This is just another tool in their kit to herd the United States toward global socialism.
37 posted on
09/12/2007 11:05:57 AM PDT by
El Cid
(Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house...)
To: qam1
Oh this is terribly worrying. I believe the Cayman Islands are one of those places where Bill and Hillary stash their dough. Whatever will they do if it sinks?
38 posted on
09/12/2007 11:06:49 AM PDT by
Argus
To: qam1
For example, do we know how much of Grand Caymans land mass will disappear with a six inch rise in sea level, with a one-foot rise, with a three foot-rise, and so on? They don't have topographic maps in the Caymans?
To: qam1
Middle of September and I’m still harvesting tomatoes.
I’ll keep some of this global warming...thank you. :)
To: qam1; Killing Time; Beowulf; Mr. Peabody; RW_Whacko; honolulugal; SideoutFred; Ole Okie; ...
43 posted on
09/12/2007 11:36:28 AM PDT by
xcamel
(FDT/2008 -- talk about it >> irc://irc.freenode.net/fredthompson)
To: qam1
Since the Antarctic cap is getting thicker, I ain’t worried about the seas rising.
48 posted on
09/12/2007 1:27:00 PM PDT by
ElectricStrawberry
(1/27 Wolfhounds...cut in half during the Clinton years.)
To: qam1
It was 39F this morning in Aurora, IL, about 35 miles west of Chicago.
Global warming my ass.
49 posted on
09/12/2007 1:28:38 PM PDT by
toddlintown
(Five bullets and Lennon goes down. Yet not one hit Yoko. Discuss.)
To: qam1
The article you posted is filled with misinformation and unproven statistics. Go to www.CO2science.org, read everything. Then get Chris Horner's book, The Politically Incorrect Guide to Global Warming, read it cover to cover. Then find something real to worry about. Like how long it's been since the Cubs won the World Series. Or terrorists.
"At the current sea-level-equivalent ice-loss rate of 0.05 mm per year, it would take a full millenium to raise global sea level by just 5 cm, and it would take fully 20,000 years to raise it a single meter." pg 150.
51 posted on
09/12/2007 3:06:29 PM PDT by
athelass
(Proud Mom of a Sailor and two Marines! Frodo Lives!)
To: qam1
Once again, we ask the question: is anyone other than Cayman Net News paying attention to this scenario
I don’t want to alarm anybody but I’ve moved my money out of Cayman banks.
53 posted on
09/12/2007 3:19:15 PM PDT by
Joan Kerrey
(Believe nothing of what you hear or read and half of what you see.)
To: qam1
Definitions ~ an icesheet is different than an icecap in that it is larger. An icecap occurs when the amount of ice in a given area (on land) exceeds 85% coverage. If the average amount of open water exceeds 14% coverage, then the result is not referred to as "sea ice", and certainly not as an icecap, nor a polar icecap, nor an icesheet.
Obviously if the ice on a body of water is interspersed with 15% open water, that does not mean the ice has disappeared.
The definitions are easy to find and apply to the current condition in the Arctic ocean.
54 posted on
09/12/2007 4:58:12 PM PDT by
muawiyah
To: qam1
However, everything we have written on this topic has been met with a deafening silence as to any contingency plans in this respect.
Because you're full of Cayman crap.
55 posted on
09/12/2007 5:17:58 PM PDT by
aruanan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-38 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson