Skip to comments.
Abizaid: World could abide nuclear Iran
AP ^
| 17 Sept 2007
| ROBERT BURNS
Posted on 09/17/2007 4:28:52 PM PDT by Fitzcarraldo
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
To: Fitzcarraldo
4
posted on
09/17/2007 4:31:20 PM PDT
by
Adams
To: Fitzcarraldo
“Iran is not a suicide nation,” he said. “I mean, they may have some people in charge that don’t appear to be rational, but I doubt that the Iranians intend to attack us with a nuclear weapon.”
Thank you for your service, General.
I’m glad you’re retired.
5
posted on
09/17/2007 4:32:45 PM PDT
by
nuconvert
("Terrorism is not the enemy. It is a means to the ends of militant Islamism." MZJ)
To: Fitzcarraldo
Now we know why Iraq was such a mess after the initial invasion.
6
posted on
09/17/2007 4:34:21 PM PDT
by
neodad
(USS Vincennes (CG-49) Freedom's Fortress)
To: Fitzcarraldo
The main problem with Gen. Abizaid’s reasoning is that Iran has attacked us with impunity in the past. Iran continues to attack us with impunity now. Iran sponsors terrorism around the world with impunity. What makes anyone in the Iranian government believe that it will not get away with nuking the USA, Israel or Europe? Heck, the EU is so spineless that if it was nuked by Iran it would draft a list of reasons why it was deserving of a nuclear attack.
7
posted on
09/17/2007 4:34:48 PM PDT
by
pnh102
To: Adams
The good General doesn’t seem to think that the Iranian Revolutionary Guards throught their QODS force are capable or could pass these weapons on to the their client surrogates, hezbollah, hamas, the Mahdi Army, the Special forces.
The more I read about this guy the more I realize that he was the weak link in the chain-of-command.
8
posted on
09/17/2007 4:35:21 PM PDT
by
AdvisorB
("A Hillary Clinton presidency would result in a weaker economy and a weaker America" Dick Morris)
To: Fitzcarraldo
He has a point. It’s the delivery of nuke warheads to clients like Syria that might be a problem until the coordinates are established. Five minutes, no problem.
9
posted on
09/17/2007 4:36:41 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Snow above 2000', oil above 81: unexplained)
To: Fitzcarraldo
The general is confusing the attitudes of the Iranian people with its leadership.
No, the Iranian people would not attack us. But they’re not the ones with the nukes.
10
posted on
09/17/2007 4:37:25 PM PDT
by
Ramius
(Personally, I give us... one chance in three. More tea?)
To: nuconvert
>>>
Thank you for your service, General.
Im glad youre retired.<<<
Sounds like a disciple of Colin Powell. I'm glad they are both retired, but like Greenspan, they can still damage American interests by opening their mouths!
11
posted on
09/17/2007 4:38:06 PM PDT
by
HardStarboard
(Take No Prisoners - We're Out of Qurans)
To: Fitzcarraldo
"I mean, they may have some people in charge that don't appear to be rational, but I doubt that the Iranians intend to attack us with a nuclear weapon."
And they'd never think of flying planes into our buildings or supplying Al Queda with IED's or missiles to kill our soldiers.
12
posted on
09/17/2007 4:40:13 PM PDT
by
mass55th
(Courage is being scared to death - but saddling up anyway~~John Wayne)
To: Fitzcarraldo
Where do we keep getting these idiots?
13
posted on
09/17/2007 4:40:24 PM PDT
by
SIDENET
(I don't want to find "common ground" with a bunch of damn leftists.)
To: neodad
Ithink it shows why he was surprised when Iraq almost fell apart after the bombing of the Golden Mosque. He didn’t know how to deal with fanatics. So he allows a nutjob like Sadr to survive and why he expected Sadr to evolve into a political leader.
14
posted on
09/17/2007 4:41:14 PM PDT
by
RobbyS
( CHIRHO)
To: neodad
Ithink it shows why he was surprised when Iraq almost fell apart after the bombing of the Golden Mosque. He didn’t know how to deal with fanatics. So he allows a nutjob like Sadr to survive and why he expected Sadr to evolve into a political leader.
15
posted on
09/17/2007 4:41:15 PM PDT
by
RobbyS
( CHIRHO)
To: Fitzcarraldo
"There are ways to live with a nuclear Iran," Abizaid said in remarks at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, a think tank. "Let's face it, we lived with a nuclear Soviet Union, we've lived with a nuclear China, and we're living with (other) nuclear powers as well."Oyvey. It isn't Iran's launching nuke tipped ICBM's that we have to worry about. It's Iran's relationship with terrorist networks.
What is the matter with Americas former Generals?
16
posted on
09/17/2007 4:45:41 PM PDT
by
jwalsh07
To: Fitzcarraldo
I’m one who finds it difficult to believe Iran would attack a nuclear armed state with nuclear weapons.
Your crazed muslim foot soldier sent on jihad might have suicidal thoughts.. the clerics, political leaders and generals back home who are living it up in luxury, with multiple wives; those guys sure aren’t thinking of suicide.
17
posted on
09/17/2007 4:45:43 PM PDT
by
ran20
To: Fitzcarraldo
I mean, they may have some people in charge that dont appear to be rational
General, all they need is one irrational idiot looking for his 72 virgins with his had poised over the nuclear button!!!!
18
posted on
09/17/2007 4:47:24 PM PDT
by
doc1019
(Fred Thompson '08)
To: Fitzcarraldo
Abizaid is an Arab born of Lebanese Christian parents. He studied in Amman, Jordan. He rose to prominence by virtue of a perception that his arab background would score points with the arab street. Well he’s certainly scoring points in the arab streets today.
To: ran20
the clerics, political leaders and generals back home who are living it up in luxury, with multiple wives; those guys sure arent thinking of suicide. I for one wouldn't take the chance of putting our safety in the hands of clerics, political leaders and generals in a terrorist-supporting country who want us all dead anyway. Even if we nuked Iran into oblivion after they have destroyed New York, the fact remains that they have still destroyed New York.
20
posted on
09/17/2007 4:50:03 PM PDT
by
pnh102
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson