Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Repeal the 17th Amendment and the Democrats control the senate. They control both houses of the legislature in 23 states. That 46 seats right there. In 11 states the Democrats control one house and the Republicans control the other. Assume they compromise and split the Senate seats between the two parties and that’s still 11 more Democrats in the Senate. Final total is 57 Democrats and 43 Republicans.


8 posted on 10/20/2007 4:16:02 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur (Save Fredericksburg. Support CVBT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Non-Sequitur

Temporarily (as we know most people in the states are conservative minded); that will be remedies in the normal if it happens, electoral process).. It will have the long term-effect of having much more conservative senators!


11 posted on 10/20/2007 4:19:00 PM PDT by JSDude1 (When a liberal represents the Presidential Nominee for the Republicans; THEY'RE TOAST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Non-Sequitur

Think of it as an incentive to pay just as much attention to the State elections as the Federal. Most people don’t even know who their State representatives are, let alone what their politics are.


19 posted on 10/20/2007 6:14:46 PM PDT by Mountain Troll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Non-Sequitur

I will admit, repealing the 17th would be of greater benefit if the Supreme Court hadn’t ruled that all legislative houses must have proportional representation. I suspect there would be more houses in the Republican camp if some were based on geographical representation, not proportional.


28 posted on 10/21/2007 2:45:02 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Repeal the Terrible Two - the 16th and 17th Amendments. Sink LOST! Stop SPP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Non-Sequitur

The length of the term served is still six years, that would not change. And remember, just one of the consquences the 17th amendment was an almost complete lack of interest in state-wide elections only. Ever seen the vote tallies in state elections when a candidate for U.S. Senator or president wasn’t running? State elections would become much more important and smart candidates would run a platform on not letting as much of their state’s taxpayer money leave the state, allowing more local policies to prevail.


35 posted on 10/21/2007 9:11:40 AM PDT by LowCountryJoe (I'm a Paleo-liberal: I believe in freedom; am socially independent and a borderline fiscal anarchist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson