Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FEC heads toward shutdown (do nothing imperial congress)
Politico ^ | Today

Posted on 12/19/2007 5:55:25 PM PST by enough_idiocy

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) just announced that the Senate will not clear four new appointees for the Federal Election Commission, meaning the panel that acts as a watchdog on political campaigns cannot function during the critical election-year period.

Reid is blaming the White House for refusing to withdraw to allow a majority vote on the nomination of Hans von Spakovsky for a seat on the commission. Republicans want von Spakovsky approved as part of a slate of four FEC nominees or they will refuse to consider any of the nominees.

Von Spakovsky was recess appointed by President Bush to the FEC, but his term expires at the end of the year. Democrats have refused to allow his nomination to move forward, arguing that his actions while at the Justice Department disqualified him for the post. Bush, though has not backed down, and the matter has been at an impasse for the last four months.

Now, with the Senate moving toward adjournment until mid-January, Reid signalled that Democrats will not move any FEC nominations if they include von Spakovsky, meaning the commission will only have two of its required six members. Reid said he offered the GOP a straight majority vote on all the FEC nominees, including von Spakovsky, but the White House refused to accept that offer.

Reid said he will not relent on von Spakovsky, who has come under heavy criticism from civil-rights groups, and he blamed the White House and Republicans for the stalemate. "If they do not, the responsibility for a defunct FEC willl rest solely on their shoulders," Reid said. Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) told reporters today that Democrats are unfairly trying to block a GOP nominee to the FEC, which is overseen by a panel of three Democrats and three Republicans. "The Democrats have picked their nominees and we've picked ours," McConnell said. "What we have here -- once again it happened with one of our nominees toward the end of the Clinton administration -- the Democrats trying to veto one of our nominees. That isn't going to happen. They're all four going to go together or none of them will be approved."


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 110th; 2008; appointees; congress; fec; obstructionistdems; spakovsky; vonspakovsky; voterfraud
Once again the do nothing dummies play fast and loose with the Constitution. No agency heads to oversee elections during a major election cycle brough on by a party with a track record of voter fraud, campaign finance violations, and the largest violations in US history (Kerry's 04 campaign). I'm shocked.
1 posted on 12/19/2007 5:55:27 PM PST by enough_idiocy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: enough_idiocy

Bush should appoint them with an Executive Order.


2 posted on 12/19/2007 6:00:08 PM PST by Mad_Tom_Rackham (Elections have consequences.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mad_Tom_Rackham

The FEC is a federal agency all of us would be better off without.


3 posted on 12/19/2007 6:02:24 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: enough_idiocy

It won’t make any difference if the FEC is unable to oversee the election. They never do anything until the election (and the cheating) is over. Then they fine violators afterward. Once the election is past, a new president will appoint new people to the FEC and the fines will be a little later than usual. So?


4 posted on 12/19/2007 6:18:41 PM PST by penowa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: enough_idiocy

FEC is useless so they might as well hold their ground.


5 posted on 12/19/2007 6:19:15 PM PST by NonValueAdded (Fred Dalton Thompson for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: enough_idiocy
They should let it die and then replace it with a new commision:

FECAL: Fools Electing Candidates Advanced by Lobbyists

6 posted on 12/19/2007 6:22:41 PM PST by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: enough_idiocy

The claims against Hans von Spakovsky upon which the left relies to block his nomination are all absolute partisan lies.


7 posted on 12/19/2007 7:59:51 PM PST by Buckhead (making the comments buckhead won't make!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: enough_idiocy

The FEC has allowed Hillary to get away with the greatest campaign finance fraud in history.


8 posted on 12/19/2007 8:18:31 PM PST by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson