Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge upholds Muslim scholar's U.S. entry ban
Reuters ^ | Christine Kearney

Posted on 12/20/2007 3:50:20 PM PST by RDTF

NEW YORK (Reuters) - A U.S. federal judge on Thursday upheld a government decision to refuse a prominent Swiss Muslim entry into the United States, saying the question of denying visas was best left to the authorities.

The United States had revoked the visa of Tariq Ramadan, an academic at Britain's Oxford University and a vocal critic of the U.S. invasion of Iraq and its support of Israel.

The State Department initially gave no reason, but later said Ramadan had been barred under a provision of the USA Patriot Act that bars anyone who endorses terrorism.

In October the American Civil Liberties Union denied this and argued Ramadan's exclusion was therefore unlawful.

But U.S. District Judge Paul Crotty sided with U.S. government lawyers who argued the courts did not have the power to review visa denials.

"The government has provided a facially legitimate and bona fide reason for Professor Ramadan's exclusion," Crotty said.

"The court recognizes the limits on its authority in this case. The question of admissibility of aliens is a political question, a question which is best left to the legislative and executive branches," he said.

Ramadan said he was told he had been barred because he gave 1,670 Swiss Francs ($1,946) to the Association de Secours Palestinien (ASP) from 1998 to 2002.

Washington banned ASP in 2003, saying it supports terrorism and had contributed funds to Hamas.

-snip-

(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 1998; 2003; asp; associationdesecours; goodjudges; hamas; judgepaulcrotty; judicialsanity; patriotact; paulcrotty; ramadan; tariqramadan; terrorism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

1 posted on 12/20/2007 3:50:21 PM PST by RDTF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cindy; Oorang

a glimpse of sanity


2 posted on 12/20/2007 3:50:56 PM PST by RDTF (Remember Pearl Harbor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RDTF

Ten bucks says he’s now looking at coming across from Mexico.


3 posted on 12/20/2007 3:52:44 PM PST by diverteach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: diverteach

probably already here, chatting with somebody in an ACLU office


4 posted on 12/20/2007 3:54:53 PM PST by highnoon (Stop global whining)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RDTF
Atta go Judge Paul Crotty. Finally we see the media report a judicial function properly executed.
5 posted on 12/20/2007 3:57:28 PM PST by Candor7 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Baghdad_(1258))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RDTF
the American Civil Liberties Union denied this and argued Ramadan's exclusion was therefore unlawful

When will we declare the ACLU unlawful and terroristic?

6 posted on 12/20/2007 3:58:37 PM PST by mtbopfuyn (I think the border is kind of an artificial barrier - San Antonio councilwoman Patti Radle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mtbopfuyn

and obviously they should not be called “American Civil’ anything since they support non Americans


7 posted on 12/20/2007 4:00:04 PM PST by RDTF (Remember Pearl Harbor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RDTF
No foreigner has a right to enter the United States.

The government should have no obligation to refuse entry unless refusing entry conflicts with laws passed by our Congress.

8 posted on 12/20/2007 4:00:32 PM PST by untrained skeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RDTF

Muslim scholar - - Jihadi that can read and write.


9 posted on 12/20/2007 4:08:47 PM PST by Beckwith (Dhimmicrats and the liberal media have chosen sides -- Islamofascism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RDTF

10 posted on 12/20/2007 4:11:42 PM PST by B-Cause (“If you think health care is expensive now, wait until it is free!”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

gotta love it when they use our own laws against us!


11 posted on 12/20/2007 4:13:52 PM PST by RDTF (Remember Pearl Harbor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

Bush appointee. Actually believes in the separation of powers. Nice!


12 posted on 12/20/2007 4:27:45 PM PST by xroadie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: xroadie
Photobucket

Yup, good old Tariq, layin' the jihad on the new generation. In Britain he advances the Islamofascist infrastructure, under the guise of evangelical Islam. Too bad they didn't let him into the USA, where he could have been taken alligator hunting in the Bayou's of Southern Florida.

13 posted on 12/20/2007 4:36:55 PM PST by Candor7 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Baghdad_(1258))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: RDTF
A setback to the ACLU. The federal government has settled power to bar the entry of aliens into the United States for any reason or for no reason at all. Foreigners do not have a right to enter our country. They have a privilege and that privilege can be revoked if the national interest requires it.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

14 posted on 12/20/2007 5:13:17 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RDTF
a glimpse of sanity

Finally! Thanks for the good news ping RDTF.

15 posted on 12/20/2007 5:37:37 PM PST by Oorang (Tyranny thrives best where government need not fear the wrath of an armed people - Alex Kozinski)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RDTF

Since when do foreigners have a right to a US visa? That’s crazy!


16 posted on 12/20/2007 8:53:15 PM PST by winner3000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RDTF
"The court recognizes the limits on its authority in this case. The question of admissibility of aliens is a political question, a question which is best left to the legislative and executive branches," he said.

Holy crap! This is from a federal judge? Hell hasn't frozen over but it must at least be a few degrees cooler.

17 posted on 12/20/2007 9:53:01 PM PST by GATOR NAVY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RDTF

bump


18 posted on 12/20/2007 9:55:03 PM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GATOR NAVY

Is he a Republican appointee?


19 posted on 12/20/2007 11:36:09 PM PST by SatinDoll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll

Appointed by G.W. Bush 2005. Apparently he hasn’t been in place long enough to “grow”, as the media describes any conservative’s slide to the left.


20 posted on 12/20/2007 11:59:50 PM PST by GATOR NAVY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson