Posted on 01/20/2008 4:13:34 PM PST by NormsRevenge
PARIS (AFP) - A powerful volcano erupted under the icesheet of West Antarctica around 2,000 years ago and it might still be active today, a finding that prompts questions about ice loss from the white continent, British scientists report on Sunday.
The explosive event -- rated "severe" to "cataclysmic" on an international scale of volcanic force -- punched a massive breach in the icesheet and spat out a plume some 12,000 metres (eight miles) into the sky, they calculate.
Most of Antarctica is seismically stable. But its western part lies on a rift in Earth's crust that gives rise to occasional volcanism and geothermal heat, occurring on the Antarctic coastal margins.
This is the first evidence for an eruption under the ice sheet itself -- the slab of frozen water, hundreds of metres (feet) thick in places, that holds most of the world's stock of fresh water.
Reporting in the journal Nature Geoscience, the investigators from the British Antarctic Survey (BAS) describe the finding as "unique."
It extends the range of known volcanism in Antarctica by some 500 kilometres (300 miles) and raises the question whether this or other sub-glacial volcanoes may have melted so much ice that global sea levels were affected, they say.
The volcano, located in the Hudson Mountains, blew around 207 BC, plus or minus 240 years, according to their paper.
Evidence for this comes from a British-American airborne geophysical survey in 2004-5 that used radar to delve deep under the ice sheet to map the terrain beneath.
Vaughan's team spotted anomalous radar reflections over 23,000 square kilometres (8,900 sq. miles), an area bigger than Wales.
They interpret this signal as being a thick layer of ash, rock and glass, formed from fused silica, that the volcano spewed out in its fury.
The amount of material -- 0.31 cubic kilometres (0.07 cubic miles) -- indicates an eruption of between three and four on a yardstick called the Volcanic Explosive Index (VEI).
By comparison, the eruption of Mount St. Helens in 1980, which was greater, rates a VEI of five, and that of Mount Pinatubo in 1991 is a VEI of six.
"We believe this was the biggest eruption in Antarctica during the last 10,000 years," BAS' Hugh Corr says.
"It blew a substantial hole in the icesheet and generated a plume of ash and gas that rose around 12 kms (eight miles) into the air."
The eruption occurred close to the massive Pine Island Glacier, an area where movement of glacial ice towards the sea has been accelerating alarmingly in recent decades.
"It may be possible that heat from the volcano has caused some of that acceleration," says BAS professor David Vaughan, who stresses though that global warming is by far the greater likelier cause.
Volcanic heat "cannot explain the more widespread thinning of West Antarctic glaciers that together are contributing nearly 0.2mm (0.008 of an inch) per year to sea-level rise," he adds.
"This wider change most probably has its origin in warming ocean waters."
This image released by NASA in 2002 shows Antarctica. A powerful volcano erupted under the icesheet of West Antarctica around 2,000 years ago and it might still be active today, a finding that prompts questions about ice loss from the white continent, British scientists report on Sunday. (AFP/NASA-HO/File)
Uh oh, yet another spear in the Sacred Cow.
It’s really the mole people getting ready to launch flying saucers from their under-icesheet base to take over the world... but you didn’t hear it here. ;-)
The location of this event would probably keep it from affecting the northern hemisphere.
Cow farts and SUV tailpipes did it....2,000 years ago. Really, ask Albore, he knows.
The volcano, located in the Hudson Mountains, blew around 207 BC, plus or minus 240 years, according to their paper.
Evidence for this comes from a British-American airborne geophysical survey in 2004-5 that used radar to delve deep under the ice sheet to map the terrain beneath.
Vaughan’s team spotted anomalous radar reflections over 23,000 square kilometres (8,900 sq. miles), an area bigger than Wales.
They interpret this signal as being a thick layer of ash, rock and glass, formed from fused silica, that the volcano spewed out in its fury.
The amount of material — 0.31 cubic kilometres (0.07 cubic miles) — indicates an eruption of between three and four on a yardstick called the Volcanic Explosive Index (VEI).
By comparison, the eruption of Mount St. Helens in 1980, which was greater, rates a VEI of five, and that of Mount Pinatubo in 1991 is a VEI of six.
“We believe this was the biggest eruption in Antarctica during the last 10,000 years,” BAS’ Hugh Corr says.
—
good thing too,, a pretty good sized event would make a real mess for some.
That would be the same volcano that messes with the ozone layer down there, yes?
Of course.
Atlantis checking in from the Pegasus galaxy?
(Stargate reference) ;-)
The Global Warming freaks will attack this, but it’s pretty cool. Intriguing.
Ping of possible interest.
If old hardened black lava exploded up into the atmosphere, it could cause extreme problems.
10 years ago mexican farmers burnt up their crops and Texas had a cool summer, with the carbon blocking out the sun’s rays.
It was 4 months of haze.
W and Fox wrangled about it.
Another hole blown in the global warming cult.
Well, I won’t move there.
How would one be able to measure the change in the level of the sea to such an exacting standard as 0.2mm? You would need an absolutely stable rockmass to measure from which is well away from any plate tectonics, which describes absolutely no place on the planet.
This 'prof' spins more than Lanny Davis doing a triple lutz. Warming ocean waters? Where did the heat come from? Undersea volcanism and sub-ocean floor methane emissions have been going on longer than those nasty SUVs.
Of course it is, not matter what other evidence may indicate.
Volcanic heat "cannot explain the more widespread thinning of West Antarctic glaciers that together are contributing nearly 0.2mm (0.008 of an inch) per year to sea-level rise
Let's see...if I remember my engineering correctly, that results in ...
1,000 [year] x 0.008 [inch/year] = 8 inches!
OMG. 8 inches in 1,000 years. Head for the hills! Spend trillions junking our energy infrastructure and make us all live like cave men. Deny developing countries the benefits of plentiful energy. It's a calamity!
Isn’t that where Muller pulled Sculley out of the spacecraft? Must not be a natural volcano.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.