Replies

"In all fairness, the whining of various Clintonistas about how the timing of the attack prevented THEIR guy from having a chance to prove his greatness seems to make it unlikely they knowingly helped it to happen."

I respectfully disagree with you on [that] point, above.
Anyone claiming to know the Clintons in the least, what one or both did and were/are capable would believe a single solitary word coming out of their lying mouths, whining notwithstanding. In fact a damned solid argument could be mounted one w/could always know when a Clinton was lying because their mouth would be moving.
Fact.

The very fact the Clinton & Clintonistas whined makes a[ny] theory they were in some way, somehow complicit quite plausible, indeed.

Moreover using hindsight looking back at the course of events following 911, it makes more & more sense they were involved. Because 911 --incredibly-- provided Liberal-Socialists everywhere multiple platforms from which to launch attacks against the United States of America, American citizens, the American military and on and on so long as it was "American".

I do not believe in *coincidence* SO the leftist's treasonous shticks struck me as all-too-prepared, too well organized with one attack following the other before the first was even finished.

Were the Clintons involved, at any level insofar as 911 was concerned?
I've no way of knowing for sure except to say knowing them as I do *&* having lived through 8 (long) years of their regime? The most corrupt regime in the republic's history? I cannot in all honesty say learning they were involved wouldn't surprise me one iota and that is as "fair" as I can and will be on the subject of everything Clinton.

The Clintons, both of them, were and ARE nothing if not irrationally spiteful; while, no one could claim either Clinton ever cared about anything except themselves, their own enrichment and the furtherance of their own power using --solely-- their own *deed(s)*.

...as a barometer.

Landru, I don't disagree with your assessment of the Clintons at all.

I only think they didn't knowingly help 9/11 to happen and pointed to how some of them actually commented that if it had happened earlier than President Clinton, rather than President Bush, would have had a chance to strut his stuff.

Of course, I would dispute (and I'd think you'd agree) that President Clinton would have had any "stuff" to strut at all. He would have handled the whole thing like he did the earlier WTC attack (among others).

Did you ever see the editorial cartoon where a man and woman were in bed and the woman says: "Thank God for President Bush!" to which the man responds: "Shut up, Tipper!"