Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BUT MCCAIN COULD WOO THEM BACK (illegals declare war on America--riding McC into Casa Blanca)
NY POST ^ | February 24, 2008 | Linda Valdez, columnist,Arizona Republic

Posted on 02/24/2008 6:16:53 AM PST by Liz

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
To: Liz

http://www.peterfpaul.com/2008/02/21/bills-fraud-trial-delayed-hillary-says-process-server-must-catch-her-for-deposition/

Hillary Thwarts Judge’s Directive To Testify in Paul v Clinton By Requiring Process Server Catch Her With A Witness Subpoena

Hillary again revealed her contempt for the legal process in an extraordinary development in the Los Angeles Superior Court hearing in the Paul v Clinton et al civil fraud case against Bill and Hillary Clinton today.

The business fraud suit being prosecuted by Hillary’s largest donor Peter Paul is finally proceeding to trial after years of delays in the appellate court fight to keep Hillary in the case as a defendant rather than a material witness. Judge Munoz allowed Paul to commence discovery (sworn depositions of witnesses) after a three year hiatus, while agreeing to set a trial date at a hearing to be held in April, 2008.

In response, Hillary Clinton’s attorney David Kendall declared that none of Hillary Clinton’s lawyers would accept a deposition subpoena on Hillary’s behalf.
MCAIN 2008, before a commie gets in!


41 posted on 02/24/2008 4:02:17 PM PST by OPS4 (Ops4 God Bless America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: moehoward

You got that right.


42 posted on 02/24/2008 4:03:02 PM PST by Liz (I spent $60 million and got one lousy delegate. Rudy Giuliani)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Liz

Sounds like Linda Valdez has been drinking a too much of the Juan Valdez java....(or snorting a bit of the Juan Valdez white powder)


43 posted on 02/24/2008 4:29:04 PM PST by mdmathis6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TLI; All

You assume that all 30 million illegals are of voting age. 30 million illegals are 600,000 per state. Yet the highest concentrations are in the southwest and California and in city regions of the North East and the Mid-Atlantic.

30 million Mexican illegals is only 10 per cent of the population and only 10 million at most will actually be able to vote at one time(assuming amnesty). A large portion of that may vote monolithically Democrat but you can bet a healthy minority per cent will vote the other way. More of the educated and female among them will vote verses the males.

In short, some local elections may be more distorted especially in the southwest, but on the whole, party officials in both parties may not get the big bang they were hoping for via amnesty of illegals. The rest of the nation’s population is growing as well; especially the numbers of white evagelicals and conservative Catholics who are having 3 or more children(and many of whom are being home-schooled or privately educated).

Any problems with my logic?...have at it all....!


44 posted on 02/24/2008 4:52:04 PM PST by mdmathis6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: mdmathis6
30 million Mexican illegals is only 10 per cent of the population

You are referring to elections that are decided by a half percent or so. And the illegals are not evenly divided.

Taking the other view, would you be glad to get an extra 30 million Republican votes in a national election? Dang right you would…

45 posted on 02/24/2008 5:23:19 PM PST by TLI ( ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: mdmathis6

Oh for Christ’s sake!!!

What part of illegal do you not understand, and for that matter, the President of the United States takes an oath to uphold the Constitution, but I don’t think they really mean it...

We American’s need to start carrying copies with us, especially to the debates, and ask questions based solely on issues that can be answered through quotes from the Constitution.

On this topic, illegal immigration, it is covered, not in these exact words, but it says that one of the Government’s main jobs is to protect each State from insurrection or invasion.

Notice it doesn’t mention what kind of invasion, just invasion, and I think this very well falls within that category...

The first amendment gives the people the right to ask these kinds of questions, so why aren’t we doing it?

Texas was originally a part of Mexico, not of much use to the Mexican government at the time when early American settlers went South and started growing cotton and raising cattle there, but they soon got enough of that and sent an Army to run out the invaders from Mexican land. Remember the Alamo? It was a battle of Mexican and American troops, a war over land. We didn’t enter with force at first, and mark my word, this is on the same parallel, and if it isn’t soon taken care of there will be another war, but not military, it will be civil in nature.


46 posted on 02/24/2008 5:25:08 PM PST by BedRock ("A country that doesn't enforce it's laws will live in chaos, & will cease to exist.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: mdmathis6
You assume that all 30 million illegals are of voting age.

They will be voting in the 2012 and 2016 elections and yes the amnestied illegals will be hitting the voting booths. Think what will happen when the flood of ignorant anchor babies start voting. Most of them around he can't even speak English and they were BOARN here in the DFW area.

47 posted on 02/24/2008 5:32:18 PM PST by TLI ( ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: TLI

You assume they’ll all vote...if they are as ignorant as you say many of the males will be gang banging in the big cities and dealing drugs.

My purpose was to actually analyze the 30 million amnesty vote thingy and to question the presuppositions that come with that. We make assumptions as well that white touchy feely Democrats won’t start to get really alarmed when the trashing of the Southwest really gets going in earnest, especially when the Azlan’ders start trying to secede from the US. The choice...living in “Evil” America or workers “paradise”(read hell hole)Azatland...which do you think they will pick?

Birth-rates are stable, even among whites; and despite current greater birthrates among illegals, there are indications that even those will level off.

Yet, don’t get the notion that I support amnesty. The moneyed folks who want to profit from this will discover that amnesty for the illegals means that very soon the Mexicans will start demanding top dollar for their wages as they will have gained a certain amount of protection from deportation(so co-ercive threats won’t be useful against them). Who will the Moneyed interests want to employ at cheap wages next?Guatamalans?


48 posted on 02/24/2008 6:04:28 PM PST by mdmathis6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: BedRock

Oh I wasn’t saying amnesty was a good thing, nor do I discount the damage being done to our border lands’ economies and our national security. I should like to see a birthing of a REAL minuteman militia movement to secure our borders, despite politicos’ prostestations of “vigilantism”!

I am questioning some demographers’ methods of calculating birthrates and their effects on future America...especially statements that Americans will be 50 per cent minorities by 2050. I question Azatlanders’ statements that they will “out birth” “white” gringos. I think the birthrates of evangelical families and conservative Catholics are being
discounted and under valued.(I have 4 kids myself).

Official estimates from Mexico state that about 10 per cent of Mexicans(10 million) do live in the US, many of hopscotching back and forth or sending money home from jobs in the US). This doesn’t break down into how many are actually children or anchor babies.

We aren’t even sure that the “30 million” illegals figures are accurate since there is no reliable means to count them. There may be more than 30 million but, because of constituency groups’ tendencies to exagerate numbers to gain more legitimacy for increased government largesse, I tend to reduce that number by a third.

I question that the races will even stay as homogenous since there is much higher degree of inter marriage between whites and hispanics than there are between whites and blacks or whites and Asians.

As for any sort of North American “Union”, if there ever was going to be one, it had better be ruled by the US CONSTITUTION!


49 posted on 02/24/2008 6:29:24 PM PST by mdmathis6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: mdmathis6
You assume they’ll all vote

You are assuming they will not vote. All indications are that it is their primary objective.

...if they are as ignorant as you say many of the males will be gang banging in the big cities and dealing drugs.

It does not require intelligence of any sort to vote. Democrats do it every twoyears and even they can find their way to a voting booth. If the Mexicans are rallied correctly (stick it to the gringo for stealing “our” land) they will be out in droves. As soon as those amnestied-americans get their paperwork they will be getting their Drivers License. And with Motor Voter laws comes a bonus card.

Perhaps you need a reminder, eh? Because one does not need to “assume” that their objective is voting…
They are making it quite clear.

This is what the anchor babies are learning in school...

Here is what they are learning from their illegal alien parents…

And if you have any doubts that there are not organized forces out there to pump the illegals up...

50 posted on 02/24/2008 6:44:02 PM PST by TLI ( ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: End Times Crusader

Your tagline is a joke.

As far as revolution goes... what do you think is going to happen in the American southwest when McDumbass gives 30-60 million avowed Marxists the right to vote? Moreover, what is going to happen to the United States?

Get your head out of your butt, and try to focus on the larger picture: THE FUTURE OF AMERICA. With a president that supports amnesty, SPP, and LOST, where will you go when socialism is virtually guaranteed by tens of millions of newly-minted democrat voters, and our sovereignty has been handed over to the United Nations?

I don’t advocate revolution, but I am intelligent enough to comprehend the fact that our government has evolved to a point where it is barely held in check by the Constitution and the voters. If we ever get to the point where it decides to not only ignore the will of the people, but forces them to comply at the point of a gun, I’m sure you will sit quietly while someone else sacrifices their blood and treasure for your freedom.


51 posted on 02/24/2008 6:54:13 PM PST by snowrip (Liberal? YOU ARE A SOCIALIST WITH NO RATIONAL ARGUMENT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Liz

Bump.


52 posted on 02/24/2008 7:01:18 PM PST by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz

McCain not winning in November 2008 is something that I have been OK with for oh, I suppose 8 years now.

In the 9 opportunities that I have had to vote for President, I have picked the winner exactly 3 times.

I won’t be voting for the winner this year either, once again.


53 posted on 02/24/2008 7:03:13 PM PST by Radix (I do not want to press one for English, and I'll never vote for McCain..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat
None of the mccanics ever want to address the massive amount of spending that would happen with the passage of McCain/teddy, 60 million uneducated people.

We are already spending the money for education and health care.... probably the largest hidden unrepresented tax hike in our history.

54 posted on 02/24/2008 7:06:19 PM PST by Just mythoughts (Isa.3:4 And I will give children to be their princes, and babes shall rule over them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: End Times Crusader
Hey, Thomas Jefferson, it’ll never happen. No one has the power to stand up to the United States. Any “revolution” (more like terrorist insurgency) won’t last a month. But if you’re ever stupid enough to try anything, please post it on FR so I can be sure to contact the appropriate authorities.

Hey the revolutionaries have already invaded, did you not see the sea of peoples marching through some of our large cities.... Ya reporting that are you or are you the leader of the revolutionaries.

55 posted on 02/24/2008 7:09:14 PM PST by Just mythoughts (Isa.3:4 And I will give children to be their princes, and babes shall rule over them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts
We are already spending the money for education and health care.... probably the largest hidden unrepresented tax hike in our history.

The government say we have 12 million illegals, the number is closer to 20 million if not more, after they get amnesty they each will on an average be allowed to bring in five are more family members. Now we aren't paying for those forty are so million yet. Plus a lot of them that are here now stay out of government services, but once they are legal they get it all. So don't say we are already paying. When we have just started, it will go up and up and up and up.

56 posted on 02/24/2008 7:26:20 PM PST by org.whodat (What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: TLI

I didn’t assume none of them will vote, I made an assumption that some of them will vote, not all(nor can they all). I question though how big the impact will be in the short and intermediate term. They are also mostly concentrated in California, the southwest and Texas. Florida’s Hispanics are Cuban and are a different mind-set all together.

Mexico has a 108 million folks and they acknowlgedge about 10 million live in the US all or part of the time....30 million Mexican illegals would represent a 30 percent loss of their population and just doesn’t seem realistic to me that this many has come to America in the last 10 years or so.

The concentrations will continue to effect California, Arizona, and New Mexico. But in terms of electoral votes how does the balance really change. There are still 300 million plus counted American Citizens and growing.

Now don’t think I don’t know that some of those clowns legal or not have secessionist plans for California and musch of the Souuthwest. You don’t have to show me pictures and that sort of thing...I get your point. I know that many border towns and hospitals have had economic hardships due to the unfunded mandates placed on them to “care” for these folks. Even 10-15 million undocumented Mexican illegals is a frightening figure, especially the “anchor” baby phenomena being jjammed down our throats.

My point is that I think some of the numbers have been “puffed” up and that some of these “macho” Azlanders may need to refigure their political calculations...they don’t have the numbers they think they do!


57 posted on 02/24/2008 7:33:13 PM PST by mdmathis6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: mdmathis6

The plan McHillobama will push will grant them the right to bring family in, so it’s going to be thirty-forty million times five or six.


58 posted on 02/25/2008 4:21:38 AM PST by the gillman@blacklagoon.com (And close the damned borders!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: the gillman@blacklagoon.com

So are you saying then that Mexico would tolerate or even survive the depopulation of up to 50 per cent of its population...(108 million currently down to 50 million even if they are a poor class of folks)?

Do you see why I am having trouble with the numbers being bandied about? Even the loss of 30 or 40 million folks starts to lessen the supply of cheap labor that even Mexico needs to run some of its basic services and farms.

As the US has started a trend towards tightened credit, and recession style cut backs, Mexico’s leaders have already noted a cut back of remittances back home. Mexico needs to develop itself beyond the 18th century aristocracy style economy that still encumbers it and the racism that the European blue blood Mexicans hold towards its mexican indians and mixed Mestizo peoples! America cannot save it other than through a forced annexation, with the US Constitution applied to its new Mexican territories!


59 posted on 02/25/2008 5:03:16 AM PST by mdmathis6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: mdmathis6

If most everyone left the two percent who own everything would
never miss them.


60 posted on 02/25/2008 10:16:09 AM PST by the gillman@blacklagoon.com (And close the damned borders!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson