Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Can anyone tell me whats going on with the Pre war doc projects?

Posted on 03/01/2008 12:27:44 PM PST by DrBombbay

Does anyone have any new insight as to the status of the projects? Once they disappeared I never head about them again.I found them fascinating.


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: docex; harmony; iraq; prewardocs; prewarintelligence; saddam

1 posted on 03/01/2008 12:27:48 PM PST by DrBombbay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jveritas

(( ping ))


2 posted on 03/01/2008 12:30:09 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DrBombbay

I’ve been out of town so I don’t know anything new.


3 posted on 03/01/2008 12:30:18 PM PST by Conspiracy Guy (I voted Republican because no Conservatives were running.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DrBombbay; jveritas

Maybe you should ask jveritas.


4 posted on 03/01/2008 12:31:59 PM PST by SolidWood (All conservative effort into retaking Congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DrBombbay

The Iraqi documents website was shut down on November 2nd 2006. Unfortunately no more Iraqi documents to look at and translate.


5 posted on 03/01/2008 12:33:48 PM PST by jveritas (God bless our brave troops and President Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

What was the official reason for shutting down the web-site?


6 posted on 03/01/2008 12:43:51 PM PST by SoConPubbie (GOP: If you reward bad behavior all you get is more bad behavior.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie
The United Nations complained about a published Iraqi document that contained sensitive information about Saddam regime nuclear program, so John Ngropante, the DNI chief back then, and who never wanted to publish the Iraqi documents from the beginning, took the opportunity to shut the website and shut down the truth. What a shameful action on his part!
7 posted on 03/01/2008 12:56:45 PM PST by jveritas (God bless our brave troops and President Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

No one made copies?

One would think that would have been fairly easy to do.


8 posted on 03/01/2008 1:06:30 PM PST by dynoman (Objectivity is the essence of intelligence. - Marylin vos Savant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: DaveLoneRanger

Bush could have hammered on that subject, every waking hour of every day of his time in office since the day it became an issue.

It would have accomplished exactly squat. The msm belongs to either the enemy or idiots and everything that comes out of the POTUS is torn apart by zombie hords of mindless morons posing as talking heads in the news.

The job of the msm IS to operate as the public information dissemination mechanism during time of war and they have failed, failed, failed. And we sit on our hands and blame everyone else for the failure that belongs exclusively and only to the msm.


10 posted on 03/01/2008 1:43:52 PM PST by Grimmy (equivocation is but the first step along the road to capitulation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DaveLoneRanger

The invasion of Iraq and deposing of the tyrannical Saddam were not ever claimed by Pres. Bush as being justified solely by Iraq’s possession of stockpiles of WMD. The editors of the NYSlimes and others of their ilk, including Democrats both in and without the Congress know this full well.
The public record is replete with impassioned statemens of concern about Saddam’s WMD, those he was known or thought to possess plus his intentions to produce more WMD even more dangerous, statments uttered by leading Clinton administration officials and Congressional leaders of both parties; statements made on the record whilst George W. Bush was yet the Governor of Texas as well as at least as recently as late 2002.
Short and selective memories are very useful weapons in the hands of partisan demagogues. And we fail too often to refresh the springs of knowledge and memory.


11 posted on 03/01/2008 2:00:10 PM PST by Elsiejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DaveLoneRanger
"Bush’s biggest failure has been in not fighting the justification for the war in Iraq."

Yep. I think after 2004, the Bush administration completely lost the PR game. There are important changes that need to be made in a new Republican presidential administration, but I certainly doubt McClame will make them if he wins. I think they are radical, but could restore some control of the WH over the news cycle and the "message."

12 posted on 03/01/2008 2:27:06 PM PST by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: LS

The Butler report said British intelligence had “credible” information — from several sources — that a 1999 visit by Iraqi officials to Niger was for the purpose of buying uranium:

Butler Report: It is accepted by all parties that Iraqi officials visited Niger in 1999. The British Government had intelligence from several different sources indicating that this visit was for the purpose of acquiring uranium. Since uranium constitutes almost three-quarters of Niger’s exports, the intelligence was credible.

The Butler Report affirmed what the British government had said about the Niger uranium story back in 2003, and specifically endorsed what Bush said as well.

Butler Report: By extension, we conclude also that the statement in President Bush’s State of the Union Address of 28 January 2003 that “The British Government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa” was well-founded.


13 posted on 03/01/2008 11:00:37 PM PST by steelie (Still Right Thinking)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: steelie
Where did you get that I DIDN'T think that statement was "well-founded?" I said that the administration did not do a good job of "selling" the WMDs after the war started; of sticking to its guns; and of managing the news. I further said---which I told the President personally when we met in the Oval Office in Aug. 2006---that we needed new and different ways of getting the message out. The media could "preempt" any "news" he had, or any of his views. He agreed, but we did not get into the specifics of how to do that. I then sent those specifics to his advisors, but by then it was too late. Some of them were radical in approach, and are not well undertaken in mid-administration, but at the outset of a new administration. Somehow, I don't see McCain adopting them, even if elected.
14 posted on 03/02/2008 6:37:55 AM PST by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson