Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

United Tech Offers $2.63B for Diebold
AP ^ | Sunday March 2, 9:28 pm ET | Stephen Singer

Posted on 03/02/2008 8:17:30 PM PST by BenLurkin

HARTFORD, Conn. (AP) -- United Technologies Corp., continuing to broaden its security business and expand its presence in China, said Sunday it has made an offer to buy Diebold Inc. for $2.63 billion.

United Technologies, parent company of jet engine-maker Pratt & Whitney, Otis elevator and Sikorsky Aircraft, said it made the unsolicited offer Friday after trying to negotiate a deal with Diebold for two years.

Diebold, based in Canton, Ohio, makes ATMs, business security systems and voting machines.

The $2.63 billion purchase price represents United Technologies' offer of $40 per outstanding share, about two-thirds higher than Diebold's closing stock price Friday of $24.12. United Technologies said the total enterprise value of the deal was about $3 billion.

"This transaction creates significant and immediate value for Diebold shareholders with no operational risk, while creating long term value for UTC shareholders," George David, United Technologies' chairman, said in a news release.

James Geisler, vice president of finance of United Technologies, said the company announced the offer Sunday night because executives believe their offer is "so compelling we thought shareholders should know about it."

A call seeking comment was left with Diebold.

In a Feb. 21 letter provided by United Technologies, Diebold Chairman John N. Lauer said the board discussed United Technologies' overtures but determined "it was not in the best interests of the corporation or its shareholders to pursue discussions with UTC regarding a business combination with Diebold."

Hartford-based United Technologies, which is capitalizing on strong aerospace and defense industry trends, reported revenue last year of $54.7 billion, up 14.5 percent from 2006. Net income for the year was $4.2 billion, up more than 13 percent.

The acquisition fits United Technologies fire and segment unit well, Geisler said.

In addition, Diebold's presence in the ATM market is strong in China, where United Technologies' Otis elevator business also has produced strong revenue, Geisler said in an interview. United Technologies' network of sales and maintenance for the elevators can be adapted to the ATM business, he said.

Diebold, which began in the 19th century as Diebold Safe & Lock Co., making safes and vaults, announced last month it will cut 5 percent of its work force to reduce costs, shedding 800 jobs, mostly in North America and Brazil. The cuts come on top of a plan to save $100 million announced last year.

Diebold also said it's reviewing manufacturing and storage facilities in North and South America for ways to further reduce costs.

Diebold is dealing with a sharp decline in revenue at its election systems unit and delays in Brazil, where it was to install a lottery system.

The company has said preliminary data show 2007 revenue rose 1 percent to $2.95 billion in 2007 from an adjusted $2.93 billion in 2006. Election systems revenue fell 69 percent to $61 million, and the Brazilian lottery revenue dropped 87 percent.

Diebold has not issued any financial statements since April and is being investigated by the Justice Department and securities regulators over its accounting practices.

The company said it resolved the review of how it recognizes revenue and changed an accounting practice. The change boosted revenue by $31 million in 2007 and by $27 million in 2006. For prior years, it took $190 million off the top line.

Diebold expects an ongoing review of accounting items to be done by the end of the first quarter or in the second quarter. It will then report preliminary results for the final three quarters of 2007.

United Technologies has in the past few years bought Lenel Systems International Inc. of Rochester, N.Y., a security systems and software developer; Chubb, a fire safety and security services business; and Kidde, a British fire and safety company.


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: dbd; diebold; electronicvoting; unitedtechnologies; utx

1 posted on 03/02/2008 8:17:32 PM PST by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
The economy can't be too bad if we're seeing multi billion dollar hostile takeovers...


2 posted on 03/02/2008 8:20:02 PM PST by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Before the moonbats arrive and co-habitate on this thread, they are going to accuse United Technologies of being a Republican front group which is buying Diebold in an attempt to rig all the voting machines to deliver McCain votes in November.

I live in Sarasota, FL and we have much more than our share of people with vacant eyes and loud voices.

My guess is they will proclaim Karl Rove the leader of United Tech.


3 posted on 03/02/2008 8:29:34 PM PST by Rembrandt (We would have won Viet Nam w/o Dim interference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rembrandt

> Before the moonbats arrive and co-habitate on this thread, they are going to accuse United Technologies of being a Republican front group which is buying Diebold in an attempt to rig all the voting machines to deliver McCain votes in November.

The moonbats already think that Diebold is owned by eeevil Republicans.


4 posted on 03/02/2008 8:35:55 PM PST by VictoryGal (Never give up, never surrender!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Oh, trying to buy an election, eh? :)


5 posted on 03/02/2008 8:51:01 PM PST by NonValueAdded (Who Would Montgomery Brewster Choose?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Actually the best thing for Diebold. Fantastic innovations in ATM’s for the old line banking equipment company. Great marketing killed competitors including IBM. But expanding into point of sale was a failure, as was debit card food stamp benefits, voting machines, POS gas pump terminals all were dismal ventures. Maybe United Tech will boot the losers.
6 posted on 03/02/2008 8:55:04 PM PST by TUX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
United Technologies, parent company of jet engine-maker Pratt & Whitney, Otis elevator and Sikorsky Aircraft

CH-53 bump!

7 posted on 03/02/2008 8:58:52 PM PST by FoxInSocks (B. Hussein Obama: The Paucity of Hope)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VictoryGal; BenLurkin; TUX; Rembrandt

Have you seen the membership of the UTC Board of Directors?

http://investors.utc.com/bios.cfm

This primary season I had my first experience with an electronic voting machine. I came out of the experience somewhat disturbed that there was no paper trail. I am less than comfortable with the blind trust I see placed in those who count the votes. The lack of a paper trail eliminates a key element of accountability in a process that absolutely requires one.

Seeing the name “Jamie Gorelick” involved eliminates any trust or benefit of the doubt I might otherwise been inclined to extend.


8 posted on 03/03/2008 4:18:34 AM PST by Content Provider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TUX

Good price and a good match for what is basically a good company. Diebold, along with Mosler is still a sound company.


9 posted on 03/03/2008 4:21:24 AM PST by Tainan (Talk is cheap. Silence is golden. All I got is brass...lotsa brass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Content Provider

The paper trail is, I think, something we can actually AGREE on with the left. They want it too.

[Insert broken clock metaphor here]


10 posted on 03/03/2008 6:22:19 AM PST by VictoryGal (Never give up, never surrender!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: VictoryGal

“The moonbats already think that Diebold is owned by eeevil Republicans.”

Yah, that’s a smokescreen. Diebold may be owned by eeevil Republicans but staffed by saintly libtard programmers - like newspapers.


11 posted on 03/03/2008 6:41:05 AM PST by Let's Roll (As usual, following a shooting spree, libs want to take guns away from those who DIDN'T do it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson