Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Famed Attorney 'Dickie' Scruggs Pleads Guilty to Bribery Charges
ABC ^ | March 14, 2008 | By JOSEPH RHEE

Posted on 03/14/2008 9:48:48 AM PDT by Islander7

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: colorado tanker
I recall that Trent Lott, majority leader, seemed to be making the presentation of the case against Bill Clinton in the impeachment trial in the US Senate quite difficult.
21 posted on 03/14/2008 11:37:41 AM PDT by dr huer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Sam Clements

It’s all talk radio’s fault.


22 posted on 03/14/2008 11:52:46 AM PDT by WOBBLY BOB (Conservatives are to McCain what Charlie Brown is to Lucy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: dr huer

Yup, Trent did all he could to make sure there was no real trial of the Articles of Impeachment in the Senate.


23 posted on 03/14/2008 12:14:57 PM PDT by colorado tanker (Number nine, number nine, number nine . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Timeout

“But I think it’s totally unfounded to insinuate he’s involved simply because it’s his brother in law. (Lord knows, I’d hate to be dragged into some of the things my in-laws have done.)

Don’t agree. Lott, after decades in congress, suddenly resigned with zero prior notice TWO DAYS before his very high-profile BiL is arrested.

Seriously, you don’t find the correlation of the dates to be in the least bit interesting? All it would take is one slightly improper comment by lott on a recorded conversation with scruggs during the wiretap period and it would be over.


24 posted on 03/14/2008 12:47:28 PM PDT by WoofDog123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: petitfour

One part of this story which is probably going to be safely buried forever more is the guy (who would appear to be a bagman, forget his name) to whom Scruggs has agreed to pay 50 million for his vague, undescribed cloakroom-rumor consultations in the tobacco case.

Scruggs apparently screws over every single law firm he can when it comes to fees, but went to extraordinary lengths to pay this guy more than entire firms made in years of work, yet neither of them can explain what he did for scruggs.


25 posted on 03/14/2008 12:49:40 PM PDT by WoofDog123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: WoofDog123

You are right about the $50 million guy. I read the article in the Wall Street Journal today and $50 million got my attention. It was interesting that these high powered, important lawyers talk to each other in Mississippi farm code, so as not to say anything incriminating. You’ll all remember that Jim McDougal of Whitewater fame said that he and BJ took care of their business dealings with winks and nods and the same type of gibberish.


26 posted on 03/14/2008 1:41:36 PM PDT by Sam Clements
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: WoofDog123
>One part of this story which is probably going to be safely buried forever more is the guy (who would appear to be a bagman, forget his name) to whom Scruggs has agreed to pay 50 million for his vague, undescribed cloakroom-rumor consultations in the tobacco case.<

The bagman was P. L. Blake. I imagine we'll be hearing more about him, maybe his bribe activities in Louisiana as well as in Mississippi.

And by the way, here's the full text of Dickie's plea agreement:

http://www.clarionledger.com/assets/pdf/D0103073314.PDF

27 posted on 03/14/2008 1:49:16 PM PDT by Hawthorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Hawthorn

heck, with that much money, blake was probably paying off folks in washington too, not just state legislatures.

Too big to bust, betcha its a dead story.


28 posted on 03/14/2008 2:03:34 PM PDT by WoofDog123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Islander7

Sadly, plaintiff lawyers bribing judges is a common practice.


29 posted on 03/15/2008 6:16:33 AM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson