Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: roaddog727

The reason for the cameras is safety, not revenue for the city coffers. Now we find that the city fathers want people to get killed at intersections just so they have more money to spend.


5 posted on 03/21/2008 3:43:48 AM PDT by chainsaw ( No black racist Muslims in the WH.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: chainsaw
"The reason for the cameras is safety, not revenue for the city coffers"

Yeah, right! Then how about offenders only having to do community service!

16 posted on 03/21/2008 6:02:25 AM PDT by Dacus943
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: chainsaw

Bull. If safety was important, there would be no red-light cameras. It would be up to the good judgement of our citizenry as to whether it is safer to stop at the light... or continue driving to avoid a rear-end collision.

With red-light cameras, the choice is gone. One MUST stop or one is in violation of the law. If stopping results in a rear-end collision, well... you no longer have the choice to avoid it.


30 posted on 03/22/2008 7:49:45 PM PDT by gogogodzilla (Live free or die!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson