Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UK: 'Useless' green levy on drivers rakes in £4bn
The Telegraph ^ | 4/24/2008 | Robert Winnett

Posted on 04/23/2008 11:45:53 PM PDT by bruinbirdman

The "green levy" on motorists announced in Alistair Darling's first Budget will double car tax revenue to £4 billion but reduce vehicle emissions by less than one per cent, Treasury figures have showed.

The Chancellor announced a significant increase in car tax in March.

This will result in the owners of family cars, estates and people carriers paying hundreds of pounds a year more to use the roads.

Mr Darling claimed that the duty increase was designed to encourage motorists to switch to greener cars and to reduce the environmental impact of driving.

However, the Telegraph has seen Treasury projections which disclose that while the amount raised from car tax will more than double - from £1.9 billion to £4.4 billion by 2010 - carbon dioxide emissions from motoring are expected to drop by less than one per cent.

Justine Greening, a shadow Treasury minister who obtained the figures, said last night: "This is a massive tax hike which will have virtually no impact on the environment.

"Despite their claims, the Government don't expect this move to change behaviour at all - it is just another eco-stealth tax of the worst kind."

Some of the biggest tax increases are planned for drivers of mid-range family cars, including some models of the Ford Focus, the Renault Espace and even Nissan Micras.

However, the tax rises for Porsches and Rolls-Royces will be less - leading to allegations that poorer people are again being selected by a Labour tax measure.

The Conservatives have predicted that Gordon Brown will face a revolt similar to the 10p tax protest when ordinary motorists encounter the large duty increases next year and complain to their MPs.

The Budget announced a radical overhaul of the taxation system for cars - known as vehicle excise duty - claiming that the "majority of motorists will be better or no worse off in 2009".

However, that claim has been undermined by analysis showing that nine out of 10 vehicle models will be taxed more heavily from next year.

Under the scheme, cars will be divided into 13 groups for road tax purposes depending on their CO2 emissions. Annual road tax will then be charged at up to £440 for cars such as Jaguars, Range Rovers and even some people carriers, emitting more than 255g of CO2 per kilometre.

Cars producing less than 100g will not be taxed.

At present, there are seven bands, with the least green vehicles paying a maximum of £400. Some family cars will move up several bands.

The tax on a Vauxhall Astra 2.0i 16v or Saab 9-3 MY2008 will more than double, from £210 to £430. The owner of a Ford Focus 1.6 Duratec will pay 59 per cent more (£170 to £270), and tax on a Citroen Xsara Picasso will rise by 48 per cent to £310.

From 2010, there will also be a higher first-year rate - described as a showroom tax - for new cars. This will be levied on all cars emitting more than 130g of CO2 when they are bought and varies from £115 to £950.

Models attracting the £950 charge include Volkswagen Touaregs, the Audi A6 and A8 and Volvo V70s. Those in the next band - paying £750 - include Vauxhall Vectras, Mercedes M and E class estates, and Mitsubishi Shoguns.

The latest figures show that, following the changes, the amount of revenue raised from vehicle excise duty will increase from £1,923 million in 2007 to £2,920 million this year. It will go to £3,720 million in 2009 and to £3,920 million in 2010.

An additional £520 million will come from the showroom tax in 2010, taking the Government's tax haul to more than £4 billion.

Edmund King, the president of the AA, said that motorists would be "shocked" when they had to pay the higher levels of vehicle duty for virtually no environmental benefit.

"The draconian nature of the measures are not yet understood by the public who face a double whammy after also being hit with higher petrol prices," said Mr King.

"If the projected results of the move would be to significantly reduce carbon dioxide emissions, the motoring public would be more likely to accept it. But it just benefits Treasury coffers not the environment."

There are almost 30 million cars registered and the number increases by about 500,000 annually. Therefore, only a small amount of the extra tax take is down to a rise in vehicle numbers.

The car tax increase is the latest example of policies that may be unpalatable being repackaged as environmental measures. Plans for 10 eco-towns were criticised some developments had previously been proposed and rejected.

A Treasury spokesman said: "The Government is committed to protecting the environment and tackling climate change. Part of this commitment involves promoting sustainable environmental improvements through tax and other economic instruments, and incentivising the development and uptake of lower emissions vehicles."

Motorists are already struggling with soaring petrol prices. The average price of a litre of diesel was a record 118.9p per litre yesterday, while unleaded cost 109.1p.

Petrol companies have been accused of exploiting fears over an oil refinery strike. Shortages across Scotland and northern England have been predicted if workers at Grangemouth, near Falkirk, begin a 48-hour strike on Sunday.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: fleeced

1 posted on 04/23/2008 11:45:53 PM PDT by bruinbirdman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

Do the citizens of the UK really have the incomes to afford paying these kind of taxes? Where the hell does it all come from?


2 posted on 04/23/2008 11:58:21 PM PDT by Proud_USA_Republican (We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good. - Hillary Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Proud_USA_Republican
The tooth fairy


3 posted on 04/24/2008 12:05:55 AM PDT by OeOeO (Sic Transit Gloria Mundi... Gloria get me a beer,and hurry..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

The worst of it all is, CO2 is not a pollutant.

Pay your taxes to the sheriff of Nottingham, peasants. What’s even funny about it, is the people want to pay them, thinking that they are doing something good for the environment.

Next to come, the fat people tax. They have to breathe harder to haul those big butts around, therefore spewing out more co2 than fit people. The tax will be used to pay for all the health care poor people can’t afford, and something for the children. Gotta haqve something for the children in there to make people want to pay it.


4 posted on 04/24/2008 12:28:52 AM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman
However, the Telegraph has seen Treasury projections which disclose that while the amount raised from car tax will more than double - from £1.9 billion to £4.4 billion by 2010 - carbon dioxide emissions from motoring are expected to drop by less than one per cent.

Any excuse for a tax hike will do. Global warming? Hike taxes! Expensive fuel? Hike taxes! Traffic congestion? Hike taxes!

The point is the taxes, not the problem. I will bet you dollars to donuts that the amount of CO2 emissions from driving continues to increase, in spite of this tax.

5 posted on 04/24/2008 3:06:19 AM PDT by gridlock (Proud McCain Supporter since February 8, 2008.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

Jeez, that is an absolute shock (NOT). Government imposing a “tax” to do something and does not achieve that goal but collects tons of money. Makes you think that this is just another in the series of taxes that do nothing but raise revenue from our wallets.


6 posted on 04/24/2008 4:35:20 AM PDT by Mere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Proud_USA_Republican

No the people in the UK do not have this money but will cut back and cut back until the government says: “For the common good we will force you to live on the street or for the common good we will have to kill you (or allow you to die)”.


7 posted on 04/24/2008 4:37:54 AM PDT by Mere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman; Entrepreneur; Defendingliberty; WL-law; Genesis defender; proud_yank; FrPR; ...
A Treasury spokesman said: "The Government is committed to protecting the environment and tackling climate change. Part of this commitment involves promoting sustainable environmental improvements through tax and other economic instruments, and incentivising the development and uptake of lower emissions vehicles."

 


Global Warming Scam News & Views
The Best Global Warming Videos on the Internet

8 posted on 04/24/2008 4:47:17 AM PDT by steelyourfaith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

If you tax these people more in hopes of having them buy “greener” cars how can they afford to do so? Doesn’t make any sense.


9 posted on 04/24/2008 7:23:43 AM PDT by The Great RJ ("Mir we bleiwen wat mir sin" or "We want to remain what we are." ..Luxembourg motto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson