To: CharacterCounts
No, they didn't. They pulled that off, one time, with Clinton's "red faced" testimony. The rest of the time it was GOP speculation as to what "might" happen.
I don't know what's on the tape and neither do you---all we know is that the Dem snakes are already hissing, so there is LIKELY something to it.
302 posted on
06/03/2008 10:58:50 AM PDT by
LS
(CNN is the Amtrak of News)
To: LS
"all we know is that the Dem snakes are already hissing"
LOL. That's just how I think of them..... :^)
303 posted on
06/03/2008 11:11:19 AM PDT by
Enchante
(Barack Chamberlain: My 1930s Appeasement Policy Goes Well With My 1960s Socialist Policies!)
To: LS
I don't know what's on the tape and neither do youWhere did I ever say I had any inkling of what was on the tape? I only provided a possible hypothetical alternate strategy for why Democrats are talking up the tape.
Since this entire thread is nothing more than pure speculation, I think I have the right to add my pure speculation to the mix.
304 posted on
06/03/2008 11:15:42 AM PDT by
CharacterCounts
(When you discover rats in your house, you only have two options - fumigate or tolerate.)
To: LS
308 posted on
06/03/2008 12:02:06 PM PDT by
bcsco
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson