Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Israel Attack On Iran "Unavoidable" - Olmert Deputy
Reuters ^ | June 6, 2008 | By Dan Williams

Posted on 06/06/2008 6:21:49 AM PDT by Fennie

JERUSALEM -- An Israeli attack on Iranian nuclear sites looks "unavoidable" given the apparent failure of sanctions to deny Tehran technology with bomb-making potential, one of Prime Minister Ehud Olmert's deputies said on Friday.

"If Iran continues with its programme for developing nuclear weapons, we will attack it. The sanctions are ineffective," Transport Minister Shaul Mofaz told the mass-circulation Yedioth Ahronoth newspaper.

"Attacking Iran, in order to stop its nuclear plans, will be unavoidable," said the former army chief who has also been defence minister...


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: ahmadinejad; bush; geopolitics; iran; iraq; islam; israel; military; mofaz; nuclear; olmert; proliferation; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

1 posted on 06/06/2008 6:29:04 AM PDT by Fennie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Fennie

Let’s add “inevitable”...it’s been building since Jimmah and the hostage crisis.


2 posted on 06/06/2008 6:32:19 AM PDT by yldstrk (My heros have always been cowboys--Reagan and Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fennie

He has said this before. There is really nothing new in the article.


3 posted on 06/06/2008 6:32:57 AM PDT by Perdogg (Four years of Carter gave us 29 years of Iran; What will Hilabama give us?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fennie

big words. but not very realistic. israel would think twice to attack iran on their own that´s for shure.


4 posted on 06/06/2008 6:35:46 AM PDT by austrian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fennie

Today would be
good.


5 posted on 06/06/2008 6:38:10 AM PDT by freedomson (Tagline comment removed by moderator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: austrian
Definite words. Israel has destroyed Saddam's reactor, Syrias nuke facility and will destroy Iran's nuclear plants. Mofaz permits no interpretation. The Israelis can and will pull this off quicker than Steyr can sell precision rifles to Iran.
7 posted on 06/06/2008 6:42:26 AM PDT by SolidWood (Refusal to vote for McCain is active support of Obama. Period.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: austrian

Israel doesn’t have to attack all of Iran’s nuclear facilities. Only one needs to be taken out to reveal Iran’s true plans. We sold, with the approval of Congress, bunker busters to Israel. All they have to do is destroy Iran’s nuclear power plant.

Without a nuclear power plant, Iran has no reason to continue pursuing uranium enrichment unless they want to build a nuclear weapon. It’s as simple as that. It would be positive proof of Iran’s intentions.

Israel will destroy the power plant before fuel load to avoid dispersing radiation.


8 posted on 06/06/2008 6:47:33 AM PDT by meatloaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: austrian
israel would think twice to attack iran on their own that´s for shure.

You don't think the US is behind the scenes? Please. They're going to attack, take out their arsenal, and they'll be successful..because they have to be.

9 posted on 06/06/2008 6:51:58 AM PDT by Hildy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: LtKerst

How stupid are you?
Isreal has gone it alone before, and with great success...
So the words ARE realistic. retard


first thanks for your heartwarming post to start a discussion it´s allways telling to know from the beginning how mediocre some persons are. i will keep this in mind when i´m talking to you. you might not know that iran has invested a lot of money in air defence in the latest years. btw Iran has a much bigger overall gdp than israel and a much bigger population. so tell me why has israel bombed many of it´s “neighbours” in the resent years but only talked and threatened iran, brilliant one? only because you may wish an attack does not mean it will happen.


10 posted on 06/06/2008 6:59:06 AM PDT by austrian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: austrian

Maybe we have been dumb enough not to proceed with development of a bunker buster nuc and a neutron bomb,,but Israel is not.
They realize that they need to ability to hit hardened targets and neutralize a large area.
Another cheap solution would be to drop a really dirty bomb on Iran’s sights..making them hot for centuries.


11 posted on 06/06/2008 7:02:31 AM PDT by Oldexpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SolidWood

Definite words. Israel has destroyed Saddam’s reactor, Syrias nuke facility and will destroy Iran’s nuclear plants. Mofaz permits no interpretation. The Israelis can and will pull this off quicker than Steyr can sell precision rifles to Iran.


oh this 500 sniper rifles from steyr. i´m pretty shure they will not use it to shoot down israeli war planes. :-)


12 posted on 06/06/2008 7:03:45 AM PDT by austrian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: LtKerst
How stupid are you?
So the words ARE realistic. retard

It used to say "No personal attacks" on the posting page, but it doesn't any more.

I guess you're only violating the rules of civil discussion, not the rules of the forum.

13 posted on 06/06/2008 7:04:08 AM PDT by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Hildy

You don’t think the US is behind the scenes? Please. They’re going to attack, take out their arsenal, and they’ll be successful..because they have to be.


i never said that this can never happen. i only think that this is not very realistic. because even if the USA is behind the scenes if i would be a citizen of israel i would think twice to bomb iran. because this would be an act of war under international law and iran would have every right to retaliate in any form they want. and israel is in missile range. so i would not bet my money on this option. just my thoughts


14 posted on 06/06/2008 7:25:25 AM PDT by austrian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne
Maybe Jim should enforce this.
15 posted on 06/06/2008 7:25:37 AM PDT by ASA Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ASA Vet
From that missive:
That's why you see my reminder right there in bold letters on the posting form every time you post: "NO personal attacks!"

Unfortunately, that little reminder is no longer on the posting page.

I don't know if it ever stopped anyone, but not having it certainly won't stop anyone.

16 posted on 06/06/2008 7:29:22 AM PDT by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Fennie

While a strike against Iran might be a good idea, I don’t really see how Israel could pull it off.

First of all, how many refuelings will the have to make in order for the planes to make a round trip? How will this affect their ordnance carrying capacity? How many round trips will they have to make to hit all the key sites? And, most of all, how will they make it across the air space of at least 3 different countries without being knocked down out of the sky?


17 posted on 06/06/2008 7:29:24 AM PDT by Fractal Trader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LtKerst

What others are saying is we all get emotional sometimes but please refrain from four letter words and such when making a point no matter how angry you are. We try to keep our discussions above the level of our democratic counterparts.


18 posted on 06/06/2008 7:33:03 AM PDT by McGruff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: All

What would Israel have to lose? The world already hates them, the UN stifles them at every turn. I say bomb the savages and work with their younger population who from all accounts are eager to step out from under the rule of the Mooslahs......


19 posted on 06/06/2008 7:33:04 AM PDT by Maverick68 (w)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Maverick68
I say bomb the savages and work with their younger population who from all accounts are eager to step out from under the rule of the Mooslahs......

You've touched on a good point here. From everything I hear young Iranians would love to be free from the Mullahs and be more like the West.

So if you can cut off then head of the snake without making enemies with the rest of the Iranians it could work. You gotta watch out for a retaliatory strike though.

20 posted on 06/06/2008 7:37:48 AM PDT by McGruff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson