ALA to Libraries: Keep ALMS FOR JIHAD, Pulped in the UK [Book Burning Alert]

Library Journal ^ | August 23, 2007 | Andrew Albanese & Jennifer Pinkowski

[Fiji Hill]

ALA to Libraries: Keep Alms for Jihad, Pulped in the UK

Andrew Albanese & Jennifer Pinkowski -- Library Journal

At the urging of the American Library Association’s Office for Intellectual Freedom (OIF), a scholarly book pulped by its British publisher is maintaining a safe haven in U.S. libraries. Alms for Jihad was the target of a potential libel suit in England by Sheikh Khalid bin Mahfouz, whose charitable activities have reportedly been linked to terrorist activities, as conveyed in the book. In response, publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP) pulped its unsold copies of the book, put it out of print, asked libraries to pull it, and agreed to pay damages. CUP also issued a stunning public apology on its web site in which it characterized the "serious and defamatory allegations" against Mahfouz in Alms for Jihad as "manifestly false."

In a statement released last week, the OIF recommended libraries resist Cambridge’s request. Libraries "are under no legal obligation to return or destroy the book," said OIF deputy director Deborah Caldwell-Stone. "Libraries are considered to hold title to the individual copy or copies. Given the intense interest in the book, and the desire of readers to learn about the controversy firsthand, we recommend that U.S. libraries keep the book available for their users."

As of mid-August, Alms for Jihad was not available through Amazon.com, Barnes & Noble, or Alibris. (About 1500 copies of the book were sold worldwide.) Libraries suddenly have an incredibly rare book in their stacks; a WorldCat search finds the book at nearly 300 libraries. Rather than discard the book, many libraries are safeguarding it, keeping it on hold, at the reserves desk. "I have recalled the copy of this title…in order to place it in our Rare Books collection, where it may be read by anyone but not borrowed," said Dona Straley, Middle East Studies librarian at Ohio State University's Ackerman Library. "Several of my colleagues at other institutions have reported their copies as missing."

That may be the case at University of North Carolina's Davis Library, whose catalog reveals that Alms for Jihad is "in search," meaning "someone has gone to the shelf to look for the book and not found it," said reference librarian Carol Tobin.

These sorts of measures may eventually be less necessary, because the authors hope to republish Alms for Jihad in the U.S. Co-author Robert O. Collins, a professor at University of California Santa Barbara, told LJ that he and co-author J. Millard Burr, a former state department employee, are currently negotiating with CUP for a rights reversion. The authors have had several offers from U.S. publishers.

"We stand by what we wrote and refused to be a party to the settlement," Collins said. "As soon as CUP received notice, they decided to settle as rapidly as possible despite our vigorous defense. CUP did not want to embark on a long and expensive suit which they could not win under English libel law." Indeed, libel laws in England are far more favorable to plaintiffs than those in the U.S.

Collins said he is confident Alms for Jihad will be republished in the U.S., where Mahfouz's charges would have little chance of succeeding in court. "In reality, the few passages referring to Mahfouz are trivial when compared to the enormous amount of information in the book that is in demand," Collins noted, adding that he has received calls from booksellers offering as much as $500 for copies.

[Fiji Hill]

This story is truly chilling. Since the article was published nearly a year ago, Alms For Jihad has become even scarcer--in fact, it appears to have vanished from the face of the earth.

According to the Worldcat library database, several libraries in the Los Angeles area have the book, but when I checked their electronic catalogs, it was nowhere to be found. The American Book Exchange, an online book dealer through which one can find for sale just about any book that has ever been published, also has no record of this title. and it still cannot be found on the site of its competitor Alibris

Nonetheless, I would like to read it, if only to find out what Saudi billionaire Sheikh Khalid bin Mahfouz doesn't want me to read.

[livius]

Chilling indeed.

[2banana]

Amazing, I just bought what I thought would be a digital version of a book, for $10, and find myself with a single-paragraph REVIEW of the item. Because the book has been "banned" (i.e. Amazon is chicken because they're being threatened with a lawsuit by a rich sheik who doesn't like the book because it identifies him as supporting charities that funnel money to terrorists), when you do a search for this book this is the ONLY ITEM you'll find -- so naturally you assume it's the book you want, eh? But the $10 is simply a rip-off. I've requested a refund from Amazon, they'd better deliver.

Can't find it on Amazon...

[Little Pig]

The thing that needs to happen here is for the author to permit the book to be put in the public domain. If the text goes up on Google Books, the jig will be up. Barring that, the author could “look the other way” while people with hand-scanners “read” the book into electronic form and distribute it like a 21st-century version of The Hawk That Dare Not Hunt By Day. The truth would spread, and those who would wish it otherwise would be powerless to stop it.

[nina0113]

Last time I saw a copy on eBay it went for over $200.

[The Cuban]

The more I read about what is going on in the rest of the “western” world, the more I am surprised at the brilliance of our founding fathers in insisting on a written constitution and an express bill of rights.

It amazes me that after 232 years, the U.S. is still the only country with true freedom (in spite of democrats)