Desperate Democrats watching too much tv
Posted on 09/01/2008 12:57:40 AM PDT by woofie
How do people think that the next VP of the United States of America, Sarah Palin, should handle thie stuff about Trig being not her's but her 16year old daughter's baby?
I think it should be addressed very soon and she should spell out the allegations so that all know what the left is busy working on. Then I would suggest she laugh it off with a remark like 'I dont know it sure felt like I had a baby."
In short point out the absolute absurdity of these people and not dignify any of it with anger
Any other thoughts? or ideas?
why should she have to respond? If they want to act like idiots, let them. It’s already creating a backlash against the left.
There is no “Baby Gate”. The whole thing is BS! She should treat it with the contempt it deserves.
Desperate Democrats watching too much tv
That would be perfect.
My mother always gave me great advice on crap like this:
Ignore inappropriate behavior.
Ditto.
Ditto.
I would just like her to make them suffer in the best of all possible ways ...and Im not sure anger will do it..
Being laughed at is often what they hate most
Ditto.
Seeing as she would have nothing to gain by acknowledging their accusation, much less try to answer, IMHO she --personally-- should do nothing; let her supports carry the water on this one. After all, "they" will never believe it, no matter who says what.
The hospital shows 2 babies born that day. Neither were Trig. She’s going to have to counter with hard facts. There should be a birth certificate.
Also the left’s racism and misogyny is in full view these days and I think its good for all to see it
I don't think she should respond at all. I do wonder if somebody like, say, Olberman would use this, even by oblique reference. I suppose if it got even that far, somebody should say something, but it shouldn't be expected of her that she should have to affirm that she actually bore her own son.
You know, it occurs to me that this whole thing is cynically conceived as payback for the allegations that the circumstances of Obama's birth are uncertain. It's the same theme, in a way.
Where did that little bit of info come from?
What?
Sorry, but you are way too wrapped up into this.
She did it to protect her daughter from the smears? Is that a bad thing?
And did they decide to kill the baby?
Nope. Baby boy is ALIVE, and they are taking care of baby boy.
Is that a bad thing? Did they not make a CHOICE? Don't the pro-aborts love CHOICE?
Couldn't they have quietly and secretly had the baby boy "terminated"?
In that case, none of our children were born because we’ve never let hospitals publish anything about our babies.
Why?
Well I frequent a basketball discussion forum and they have a 10 page thread going and there's many nutroots over there who actually believe this rumor.
So how to squash it?
Simple?
She simply releases her medical records.
She’ll weather it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.