Posted on 09/15/2008 10:00:19 PM PDT by neverdem
At a time when public transportation systems around the country are struggling with soaring fuel costs and pinched budgets, the bus system in Rochester has done something that few others would contemplate: This month, it lowered its single-ride fare.
Rochesters Regional Transit Service is no behemoth. It carries 15 million riders a year, as many as the New York City transit system carries in two days. But as economic hard times have reduced tax revenues and increased demand for government transit subsidies, its experiences may provide valuable lessons for larger cities that are planning fare increases, like New York, Minneapolis and Cleveland.
The Rochester system, which expects to run a surplus for the third year in a row, has been able to reduce its one-ride fare in part by eliminating some low-trafficked routes, avoiding debt and aggressively raising revenues from other sources. The fare fell to $1 from $1.25 on Sept. 1.
It has, for instance, reached agreements with the local public school district, colleges and private businesses to help subsidize its operations, warning in some cases that certain routes might be cut if ridership did not increase or a local business did not help cover the cost. In recent years, income from these agreements has equaled or exceeded the income from regular passenger fares.
All the while, ridership has increased by 7.4 percent over the last two years in an area where the population has remained stable. And while only about 1 out of 6 customers pays the single-ride fare (the majority use daily, weekly or monthly passes), the transit service expects further ridership gains now with the fare cut in place.
With gas prices at record highs, there is no better way to convince people who are beginning to look at public transportation, said Mark R. Aesch,...
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
“Just four years ago, the Rochester authority was in financial straits and facing large deficits. Since then, it has lobbied successfully for increases in state aid, receiving $32.8 million this year,”
Creativity my ass. They claim to be “profitable” and they cut fares. They do this while getting a 33 million dollar subsidy from the state taxpayers.
I say eliminate the taxpayer support. Let the people and businesses who use the bus PAY for the bus. Why the heck should I have to subsidize these freeloaders? They don’t pay for my gas. The bus doesn’t run out here so why must I pay for it?
It truly galls me that they claim to be “profitable”.
Give me a friggin’ break!
FReepmail me if you want on or off my New York ping list.
Thanks for the ping!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.