"She horrifies me because . . . I can't even talk."
Then maybe it's a good time to shut up. (A leftist's gotta know his - or her - or it's limitations.)
I would be scared to death. (Anyone polling the "who has the best legs" vote?) Oh, my...
To: Libloather
I figured out, ten years ago, that Feminists were not at all for women, they were just for Liberal politics. They gave Clinton pass because of his politics. No conscience in the NOW group.
To: Libloather
Pass the popcorn this is just getting good to see the libs implode.
She is every thing their not, she is everything they don't want to be and it is just pee in their Cheerios.
3 posted on
09/22/2008 10:19:31 PM PDT by
guitarplayer1953
(Psalm 83:1-8 is on the horizon.)
To: Libloather
The Leftist women horrify me!
Naomi Wolfe?
*snicker*
Isn’t that the gal that had to teach Al Gore how to dress like an alpha male?
Same clothes, same palette, same make-up..
LOL
Yeesh
5 posted on
09/22/2008 10:32:46 PM PDT by
MS.BEHAVIN
(Women who behave rarely make history)
To: Libloather
"She horrifies me because . . . I can't even talk. She's . . . she's just about every negative I can imagine in a candidate," the New York Daily News quoted a fuming Lisa Shannon, a left-leaning professional from Maryland,..
Left "leaning"?
7 posted on
09/22/2008 10:35:19 PM PDT by
lewislynn
(What does the global warming movement and the Fairtax movement have in common? Disinformation)
To: Libloather
It looks like to me, that these marxist pigs, can't cope when they come up against a real woman. They just stutter and stammer in frustration, because in the arena of ideas, their flimsy arguments and positions on the issues of today, just won't stand up. All that's left for them, like all other marxists when confronted with truth, is to indulge in personal attacks and name calling. It's definitely a sign of weakness on the left.
8 posted on
09/22/2008 10:37:51 PM PDT by
A6M3
To: Libloather
Ankles not Cankles 2008.
To: Libloather
10 posted on
09/22/2008 10:40:30 PM PDT by
Candor7
(Fascism? All it takes is for good men to say nothing, (http://www.theobamafile.com/))
To: Libloather
12 posted on
09/22/2008 10:49:18 PM PDT by
freekitty
(Give me back my conservative vote.)
To: Libloather
One of the better spectator sports in national politics is to see the heads of the smug, condescending Left exploding at the first contact with a genuine, unashamed American who isn't afraid of them. Ronald Reagan had that effect. It's pretty spectacular when it happens and they absolutely cannot help themselves.
But amusing as it is, there's something profoundly disturbing in the level of vituperation they direct at an individual that not a single one of them actually knows, based on three weeks' acquaintance only by media proxy. How on earth can one state "I hate everything about her" when that individual cannot know a single thing about her? These are not primary school children speaking about some new vegetable they've never tried, they're putative and self-appointed paragons of enlightenment propounding nonsense about another human being. Were they actually intelligent enough to be considered intellectuals they'd be embarrassed by it.
It isn't over anything that Sarah Palin actually is, it is an all-consuming hatred of what she represents, and what Sarah Palin represents to these people is the America they despise. I can think of no other explanation for this rabid, reflexive, inchoate hostility. It isn't healthy.
To: Libloather
Sarah Palin Derangement Syndrome is a psychiatric diagnosis characterized by paranoia and a pervasive, long-standing suspiciousness and generalized mistrust of strong independent women who own guns or who have not aborted most of their children and who identify themselves as Republicans. (DSM-IV) For a person to be considered having a Sarah Palin Derangement Syndrome , an enduring pattern of characteristic maladaptive behaviors, thinking and personality traits must be present from the onset of the time they first heard the words Sarah Palin. Additionally, these behaviors, traits and thinking must be present to the extent that they cause significant difficulties in relationships, employment and other facets of functioning.Those with Sarah Palin Derangement Syndrome are hypersensitive, are easily slighted, and habitually relate to the world by vigilant scanning of the environment for clues or suggestions to validate their prejudicial ideas or biases. They tend to be guarded and suspicious and have quite constricted emotional lives. Their incapacity for meaningful emotional involvement and the general pattern of isolated withdrawal often lend a quality of schizoid isolation to their life experience.
Differential diagnosis:
- Because of the surface similarities of the paranoia involved, it is important that the Sarah Palin Derangement Syndrome not be confused with paranoid schizophrenia, another totally different type of mental disorder where the patient has constant feelings of being watched, followed or persecuted.
17 posted on
09/22/2008 11:32:49 PM PDT by
P-Marlowe
(LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
To: Libloather
"She horrifies me because . . . I can't even talk. She's . . . she's just about every negative I can imagine in a candidate," the New York Daily News quoted a fuming Lisa Shannon, a left-leaning professional from Maryland, as saying. Makes sense...she's intelligent, rational, honest, principled, accomplished and independent...all traits liberals hate.
21 posted on
09/23/2008 1:02:32 AM PDT by
highlander_UW
(In addition to being able to field dress a moose, Gov. Palin can field dress a donkey too!)
To: Libloather
Naomi Wolf,the deepest political thinker this side of Rosie, goes for the jugular = Sarah is not in style!
It just gets better and better.
To: Libloather
You know for certain that those aren't Hillary's legs.
Hillary's drum sticks are a nightmare!
26 posted on
09/23/2008 4:28:34 AM PDT by
Jimmy Valentine
(DemocRATS - when they speak, they lie; when they are silent, they are stealing the American Dream)
To: Libloather
29 posted on
09/23/2008 6:10:42 AM PDT by
TexasNative2000
(Obviously, liberals can't handle a strong, independent woman.)
To: Libloather
"In the back of my mind she's smiling at my face and stabbing me in the back," said Hannah Suckle Her name seems very appropriate for someone who loves a Nannystate.
susie
32 posted on
09/23/2008 11:31:47 AM PDT by
brytlea
(Obama--Keep the change!)
To: Libloather
Have you guys seen this turd’s Wikipedia page? She claims she is in a battle against fascism, problem is she is the fascist.
Jonathan
To: Libloather
Naomi Wolfe’s friends (she has some doesn’t she?) really and trully need to do an intervention on her. Her rants are all over the net...and soon, for her own safety, I think someone will toss a net over her. A Xanax script would do her wonders...
35 posted on
09/23/2008 4:35:42 PM PDT by
PennsylvaniaMom
(SarahNoid/SarahPhobia, the Irrational Fear of a Strong, Conservative Woman.)
To: Libloather
.
Naomi Wolf is seriously sick!
.
36 posted on
09/23/2008 4:37:11 PM PDT by
editor-surveyor
(Obama isn't just an empty suit, he's a suit-Bomb trying to sneek into the White House.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson