Posted on 10/02/2008 8:43:07 AM PDT by freespirited
A federal judge is considering dismissing Sen. Ted Stevens's criminal case after government prosecutors violated a court order to turn over critical evidence to the Alaska Republican's defense team.
In a stunning beginning to a critical day in the trial, Judge Emmet G. Sullivan erupted at the Justice Department for waiting until just before midnight Wednesday to disclose FBI notes discussing Stevens's intent to pay for gifts that are at the center of his criminal trial.
"Why shouldn't I dismiss the indictment?" Sullivan fumed. "It strikes me this is probably intentional."
The judge said the two parties need to submit briefs to the court Thursday afternoon, and scheduled a 4:30 p.m. hearing to determine whether to dismiss the case.
A dismissal would mark a remarkable end to a years-long investigation into the actions of the longest-serving GOP senator in history, who faces reelection in November.
But Sullivan seemed to be leaning more towards imposing "lesser sanctions," like delaying the trial until the government provides all redacted FBI notes to the defense.
Brenda Morris, the government's chief prosecutor, stumbled in explaining why the notes hadn't been disclosed, saying "it was a human error." But she contended that it would not have changed the defense's case, since the government gave the defense material that summarized the notes before the trial began, and she insisted that failing to turn them over was not intentional.
Brendan Sullivan, Stevens's lead attorney, made an impassioned plea to the court, saying the case had been mishandled worse than any in his 40 years as a defense counsel.
"These materials to me represent the last straw in the process," Sullivan said. "This, the integrity of this process, has been breached. It must stop."
Had he been in possession of the relevant information, Sullivan said, his opening argument last week would have been substantially different. The government was being "disingenuous, perhaps dishonest," in contending that his argument wouldn't have changed, Sullivan said.
Stevens is facing seven counts of felony for failing to publicly disclose more than $250,000 in gifts and extensive home renovations from Bill Allen, the former chief of the Veco Corp. oil company.
According to Stevens's attorney, the evidence the government just turned over showed that Allen believed that Stevens would have paid for the renovations if he was given a bill. Stevens's attorneys say the senator paid every bill he was given — some $160,000 in home renovations — but would have paid more if he received more bills. The government says Stevens knowingly and willfully kept the information off of his Senate disclosure forms to avoid the appearance of impropriety.
Allen was expected to continue his testimony and be cross-examined Thursday. However, the jury was dismissed for the duration of Thursday as the judge deals with the issue. The jury was not present when the matter was discussed.
Stevens's attorney says the defense has been unfairly hurt by the Justice Department's error because Allen has testified since Tuesday and has not been challenged in cross-examination.
“I believe it is generally harmful for direct examination for the government’s chief witness to linger in the mind of jurors,” Sullivan said.
But the government's case may be salvaged by the fact that Allen's testimony has gone longer than expected, and the defense has not had a chance to cross-examine the government's star witness.
"By the luck of God, Mr. Allen is still on the stand," Morris said.
That seemed to make the judge angrier.
"The defendant shouldn’t have to be lucky to get the government to do its job," the judge shot back, saying it was "sad commentary" that a defendant would have to luck out to get a fair trial.
Sarah should have supported him from the beginning and called this what it was...a political hit.
Sue the prosecutor
I am so Mad at these pre-election democrap tactics I am pulling out my hair
It is no wonder people start shooting
And how many campaign contributions to Obama from foreigners are being bundled under false names and will never be investigated. We have a really rotten “justice” system.
Maybe, but I bet they kiss and make up if Stevens walks.
Brendan Sullivan is going to get this thing kicked out of court. After all, what is he? A potted plant?
I think Sarah has played this smart by staying as neutral as possible. Remember, she and McCain are running as opponents of earmarks and wasteful spending, and Stevens is the king of earmarks. Also, if Stevens gets off, it won't necessarily be because he is innocent, but because the prosecution screwed up.
I am under the impression that they have complete immunity. Am I wrong?
She really needs to be the first one to publicly embrace him and demand he be made whole.
It should be pointed out that Obama got a similiar size break in the purchase of his house from Rezko. Every time Stevens comes up we should mention that. We can only hope that Rezko Rats out before Nov.
If the prosecution withheld material info, it deserves to have its case kicked out of court. And more.
There’s no love lost between the two of them. I doubt she would have gone out of her way to say anything nice about him even if he weren’t under indictment.
He’s part of the old-school Alaskan Republican Machine, which she has gone a long way towards destroying.
It may be tough right now, not that it is not morally the right thing to do. Stevens is Senator “Bridge to Nowhere” and the media and Dems would go ape and damage her strong case as
a reformer.
Political hit or not, Stevens is still as bad a porker as any Rat.
Wait, please educate me here.
I thought Stevens was a bad guy.
It should be pointed out that Obama....EVERY damn day.
The whole "ear mark" thing is BS especially since it's only a scandal when a Republican does it. How is an ear mark different from "district services"? It's not. The media even has conservatives believing and reciting this crap.
Wait, please educate me here.
I thought Stevens was a bad guy.
Thanks for admitting you have no capacity to think.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.