[Cinnamon Girl]

According to Bill Sammon’s book “At Any Cost” his take was also that Lieberman wouldn’t go along with the Gore plan to spike the military ballots. You saw the clip yourself, didn’t you? He said what he said. I guess we could always be suspicious of him and never attribute good intentions to him, but I don’t see the purpose of that. Do you?

[Eagles6]

I had Sammon's book but it has been lent out so I'll take your word for it. I still disagree though. Lieberman was trying to cover his and Gore's a$$es after the SHTF and made no meaningful effort to change strategy. If you listen to his statement he is speaking for both Gore and himself and merely deflecting attention after the fact. He was happy to go along until that moment.

The majority of military ballots were being contested because they didn't have postmarks which many never have. All he said was they should be looked at again, not that they should be counted.