Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Google washes search results
The Register ^ | 012/14/2008 | andrew orlowski

Posted on 12/14/2008 6:11:18 AM PST by slnk_rules

Google this week admitted that its staff will pick and choose what appears in its search results. It's a historic statement - and nobody has yet grasped its significance.

Not so very long ago, Google disclaimed responsibility for its search results by explaining that these were chosen by a computer algorithm. The disclaimer lives on at Google News, where we are assured that: The selection and placement of stories on this page were determined automatically by a computer program.

A few years ago, Google's apparently unimpeachable objectivity got some people very excited, and technology utopians began to herald Google as the conduit for a new form of democracy. Google was only too pleased to encourage this view. It explained that its algorithm "relies on the uniquely democratic nature of the web by using its vast link structure as an indicator of an individual page's value. "

That Google was impartial was one of the articles of faith. For if Google was ever to be found to be applying subjective human judgment directly on the process, it would be akin to the voting machines being rigged.

For these soothsayers of the Hive Mind, the years ahead looked prosperous. As blog-aware marketing and media consultants, they saw a lucrative future in explaining the New Emergent World Order to the uninitiated. (That part has come true - Web 2.0 "gurus" now advise large media companies).

It wasn't surprising, then, that when five years ago I described how a small, self-selected number of people could rig Google's search results, the reaction from the people doing the rigging was violently antagonistic. Who lifted that rock? they cried.

But what was once Googlewashing by a select few now has Google's active participation.

(Excerpt) Read more at theregister.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Technical
KEYWORDS: agitprop; algorithm; america2point0; americans; barackobama; bias; boycott; broadband; business; censorship; china; communism; communismkills; communists; computer; corporations; corruption; data; dnctalkingpoints; earth; economy; filter; fraud; freedom; freespeach; gaggle; gmail; google; googleconscensor; googlecorrupt; googledems; googlessp; information; internet; liberals; livesearch; marxism; newmedia; news; orwelliannightmare; programing; propaganda; ratlies; reddupes; scam; searchengine; socialism; stalinisttactics; stockmarket; trust; truth; unamerican; web; world; yahoo; youtube
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-99 next last
To: ChetNavVet
Google seeks to buy out, consolidate, and rule the information world. The fact they have a leftist agenda is really the only thing that makes them evil.

Could not agree more. They are a wonderfully innovative and savvy company. I do think that because they are an INFORMATION company, they are blind to the how poisonous an ideological agenda will actually be to them. It is like viewership of the network news. Everyone laughs at it because they don't trust it. Google, with all its top notch stuff, could be a glitzy PRAVDA in a few years (although PRAVDA is actually a fairly decent news org nowadays).

21 posted on 12/14/2008 6:43:47 AM PST by slnk_rules (http://mises.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Dick Bachert

Do any of those search engines have a News Homepage. Where you just read the headlines before searching?


22 posted on 12/14/2008 6:44:11 AM PST by AmericanMade1776 ( Obama Happens! Not my Fault!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2; All

Ok, guys...based on NOT being a lefty and being technologically superior...which is the best search engine?


23 posted on 12/14/2008 6:44:53 AM PST by Recovering Ex-hippie (Obozo.....friend of dictators and wannabee revoluuuushionaries !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: angkor

Yeah. I’m firmly in the Mac camp.


24 posted on 12/14/2008 6:44:55 AM PST by null and void (Hey 0bama? There will be a pop quiz every day for the next four years...miss a question, people die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: slnk_rules

bookmark for later


25 posted on 12/14/2008 6:45:10 AM PST by IrishCatholic (No local communist or socialist party chapter? Join the Democrats, it's the same thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericanMade1776

I think I am going to use AOL.com for my homepage news instead of Yahoo for awhile.


26 posted on 12/14/2008 6:47:50 AM PST by AmericanMade1776 ( Obama Happens! Not my Fault!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: clee1

The problem with dogpile, is that it is just a regergitation of yahoo and google results. I think I like the results better from clusty.


27 posted on 12/14/2008 6:48:07 AM PST by Always Right (Obama: more arrogant than Bill Clinton, more naive than Jimmy Carter, and more liberal than LBJ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
Try cuil.com (pronounced cool)

It was started by the original creator of Googles algorithm and is someday supposed to rival Google.

28 posted on 12/14/2008 6:48:26 AM PST by Las Vegas Ron (Sho me da BC...mo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: slnk_rules

Well DUH, grasp of the obvious.

Haven’t used Google in over a year.


29 posted on 12/14/2008 6:49:43 AM PST by SouthTexas (Remember, it took a Jimmy Carter to bring us a Ronald Reagan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: slnk_rules

Google will find out , just as the dying lamestream media is, that if you can’t do the job you are supposed to do, people will go elsewhere.


30 posted on 12/14/2008 6:50:37 AM PST by Nateman (Socialism: The cockroach rule of law!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Recovering Ex-hippie

try out clusty.com....the few searches i have done, it has been very good.


31 posted on 12/14/2008 6:50:38 AM PST by Always Right (Obama: more arrogant than Bill Clinton, more naive than Jimmy Carter, and more liberal than LBJ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ChetNavVet

“the fact that the have a leftist agenda..”

Well there is that..

I still use Alta Vista, tried Dogpile and was not impressed, tried Cuil...no thanks...


32 posted on 12/14/2008 6:51:48 AM PST by padre35 (You shall not ignore the laws of God, the Market, the Jungle, and Reciprocity Rm10.10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Recovering Ex-hippie

It’s similar to the quandary of what medium to use for one’s archival backup of digital data. There may be no good answer, much less a good, long term answer.


33 posted on 12/14/2008 6:54:26 AM PST by Paladin2 (No, pundits strongly believe that the proper solution is more dilution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Dick Bachert

Don’t forget the new kid on the block:

www.cuil.com


34 posted on 12/14/2008 7:03:34 AM PST by bolobaby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: slnk_rules
An '06 article on Google's "purging".
35 posted on 12/14/2008 7:03:45 AM PST by SouthTexas (Remember, it took a Jimmy Carter to bring us a Ronald Reagan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nateman
How true. I even find shopping through them next to impossible compared to what it used to be. Looked for tickets to “Kids In the Hall” a few months ago. The first few Google results gave prices well over $100. Knew that was stupid so I looked harder. Found out that Ticketron was less than $50. Thing was I found out later that others saw the same first few results I did and didn't dig any further for better prices. They didn't want to pay for the high cost tickets and missed the show which they would have went to with reasonable ticket prices.
36 posted on 12/14/2008 7:04:45 AM PST by Hillarys Gate Cult (The man who said "there's no such thing as a stupid question" has never talked to Helen Thomas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: slnk_rules
When you offer a consumer a product and suggest it is one thing when it fact it is a radically different thing that is called "consumer fraud".

Let the consumer complaints begin!

If Google wants to avoid this trouble they can try this disclaimer on their web page:

"Warning, we are ideological one-world government socialists--and we have edited our search engine to reflect our values. If you want uncensored information go elsewhere."


37 posted on 12/14/2008 7:05:32 AM PST by cgbg ("The Second Great Depression, popularly known as 'The Obamanation'....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericanMade1776

check out “The California Chronicle” for a news page


38 posted on 12/14/2008 7:06:17 AM PST by pointsal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

I’ve used Clusty for the past couple of years. I rarely use Google.


39 posted on 12/14/2008 7:08:57 AM PST by csvset
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: slnk_rules

Good one! From the article.

40 posted on 12/14/2008 7:13:02 AM PST by Right Wing Assault (What's Obama's Secret?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-99 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson