Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Madoff Investors May Be Protected By Government
NEW YORK (CBS) ^ | Dec 15, 2008 7:24 pm US/Eastern | John Slattery

Posted on 12/16/2008 2:33:41 AM PST by ninonitti

Judge Says Those Duped Need Aid Under The Securites Investor Protection Act

― Federal investigators remain at the investment offices of disgraced investor Bernard Madoff, scouring through records to learn the scope of what may be the biggest Ponzi scheme ever in the United States.

The numbers are staggering, the losses far-reaching, but help may be on the way for investors thanks to an order for protection from a federal judge.

The scheme was operated out of the so-called "Lipstick Building" on Third Avenue. Bernard Madoff Investment Securities LLC occupies three floors and may have bilked investors of $50 billion.

Prosecutors say it was a classic Ponzi scheme. The firm paid-off earlier investors with money from new investors. It collapsed amid a nervous economy when some people wanted their money out.

"I believe he was a polished, polished, highly sophisticated schemester," said investors' attorney Mark Mulholland.

Mulholland's Long Island firm represents some 100 investors that could grow to several hundred who claim they lost millions.

"University endowments, pension funds; the scope seems to be limitless and affects little people too," says Mulholland.

In addition to publisher Mort Zuckerman; Fred Wilpon, owner of the Mets; former Philadelphia Eagles owner Norman Braman; there were the modest investors who put their faith in Madoff.

"We lost our life savings," said investor Joan Sinkin.

Brooklyn transplants to Florida, Sinkin and her husband Arnold said they lost 85-percent of a nearly $1 million investment.

"We were able to do things to enhance our retirement. Then in 72 hours, we were bankrupt," she said.

It's charged at least 50 charities were bilked, including a charitable fund set-up by the family of Senator Frank Lautenberg of New Jersey.

Meanwhile, a federal judge on Monday threw a lifesaver to investors who may have been duped, saying they need the protection of a special government reserve fund set up to help investors at failed brokerage firms.

U.S. District Judge Louis L. Stanton ordered that clients of Madoff's private investment business seek relief under a federal statute created to rescue cheated investors. Stanton also ordered that business be liquidated under the jurisdiction of a bankruptcy court and named attorney Irvin H. Picard as trustee to oversee that process.

Stanton signed the order after the Securities Investor Protection Corporation asked that steps be taken to protect investors in the scheme, which has ensnared several major banks and prominent figures as victims and could result in as much as $50 billion in losses.

Congress created the SIPC in 1970 to protect investors when a brokerage firm fails and cash and securities are missing from accounts. Funds can be used to satisfy the remaining claims of each customer up to a maximum of $500,000. The figure includes a maximum of up to $100,000 on claims for cash.

The order came just days after federal prosecutors charged Madoff with securities fraud, saying he had admitted to orchestrating a massive Ponzi scheme. Madoff is free on $10 million bail after he was charged with securities fraud last week.

Ira Lee Sorkin, Madoff's lawyer, declined to comment.

SIPC President Stephen Harbeck said in a statement that the fund's task will be harder than in other bankruptcies because of the size of the misappropriation and the condition of the defunct firm's records.

Harbeck said it would be unlikely that the trustee can transfer the firm's customer accounts to a solvent brokerage firm. He added that it was impossible at this point to determine what share each investor might hold in any remaining assets.

From its inception through December 2007, the SIPC has advanced $507 million and made possible the recovery of $15.7 billion in assets for an estimated 626,000 investors, the fund said on its web site.

Several major banks including Spain's Grupo Santander SA, Britain's HSBC Holdings PLC, Royal Bank of Scotland Group PLC and Man Group PLC, France's BNP Paribas and Japan's Nomura Holdings reported falling victim to Madoff's alleged Ponzi scheme.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bailout; greedbags; madoff; safetynet; sipc
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last
The rich are not like you or I. From what I'm reading here I guess if you're a forner millionaire who got snookered by a crook un a Brooks Brothers suit you're entitled to a personal rescue. These greedbags fell for the old risk free great return scam - let them get a good job at Wal Mart collecting carriages in the parking lot.
1 posted on 12/16/2008 2:33:42 AM PST by ninonitti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ninonitti

Just thinking about this scheme. The rich dems who insist that the rest of us pay more taxes and pay a huge ‘death’ tax as well........kept all their money in foundations that were tax exempt.

Now they have had the ultimate ‘tax’ bill. All the money is gone.

I hope they’re happy now, the hypocrits.


2 posted on 12/16/2008 2:41:46 AM PST by Carley (Prayers for Sgt. Eddie Ryan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ninonitti

“We lost our life savings,” said investor Joan Sinkin.

next time, invest in low expense index funds (stocks and bonds and not just the US) and don’t trust individual companies, funds or special gurus that claim they can beat the market. Everything reverts to the mean, including Bill Miller of Legg Mason.


3 posted on 12/16/2008 2:45:08 AM PST by ari-freedom (Conservatives solve problems. Libertarians ignore problems. Liberals create problems.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ninonitti

I believe we are all sick and tired of the “Bailouts of the Rich & Famous” all lib friends, buddies, and supporters.

Where are the bailouts for the other folks. Where is the anger?


4 posted on 12/16/2008 2:50:13 AM PST by dforest (Is there any good idea out there that Obama doesn't lay claim to anymore?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ninonitti
Congress created the SIPC in 1970 to protect investors when a brokerage firm fails and cash and securities are missing from accounts

WCBM financial talk show host over the weekend said that checks from investors were written to Madoff... PERSONALLY. There were NO traditional brokerage accounts set up. And, the investors never questioned the method in which they were receiving these large returns.

So, how can there be any recovery paid for by the taxpayers for the investors' stupidity?

5 posted on 12/16/2008 2:56:32 AM PST by xtinct (Any man may easily do harm, but not every man can do good to another. Plato)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indylindy

He's probably Mad at Madoff but also part of the problem
6 posted on 12/16/2008 2:58:16 AM PST by ari-freedom (Conservatives solve problems. Libertarians ignore problems. Liberals create problems.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: xtinct

It’s insurance, except premiums weren’t paid?

Nice.


7 posted on 12/16/2008 3:21:57 AM PST by Freedom4US
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ninonitti
God? Please let the wealth of the socialists (yes, the phoney bastards are wealthy) be tied up in this ... and God? Please let us know.

Thank you.

8 posted on 12/16/2008 3:22:00 AM PST by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ninonitti
I saw this morning that the richest man in the US Senate was knee deep in with Madoff.

Lautenberg, couldn't happen to a nicer man.

9 posted on 12/16/2008 3:24:14 AM PST by mware (F-R-E-E, that spells free. Free Republic.com baby.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ninonitti
From what I can tell from articles about the investors is that they were all stupid, greedy and lazy. Are we all entitled to 12% returns under every market condition? Don't we all deserve a fund that we can throw our 20 million into that will get above market returns without any effort on our part?

The upshot is the feds will bail this out just like everything else in the name of protecting the economy. Bit by bit the remaining credit worthiness of the entire US economy is being used up bailing out the very dumbest economic actors. Where are the bailouts for entrepreneurs or small businesses that create jobs? Oh, that's right, they are going to pay for it all.

10 posted on 12/16/2008 3:31:10 AM PST by palmer (Some third party malcontents don't like Palin because she is a true conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mware

Yeah, seems like virtually all of the very rich Senators are Democrats. I suppose it assuages their sense of guilt about being rich. I think Kohl may be the richest member of Congress. Remember Terry “Global Crossing” McAuliffe and Franklin “Fannie Mae” Raines? God, what hypocrites. And all these latter day Robin Hoods gave Obama millions in campaign contributions.


11 posted on 12/16/2008 3:33:42 AM PST by donaldo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: donaldo

I posted Madoff’s campaign contributions from an FEC.gov search in a post in the first story on this on FR. His contributions were pretty much all to the NY and national Dem suspects - Hillary, Schumer, Rangel, etc.


12 posted on 12/16/2008 3:39:10 AM PST by FreedomPoster (Obama: Carter's only chance to avoid going down in history as the worst U.S. president ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ninonitti

uh-huh
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/search?m=all;o=time;q=quick;s=protected


13 posted on 12/16/2008 3:41:52 AM PST by xcamel (The urge to save humanity is always a false front for the urge to rule it. - H. L. Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ninonitti
"We lost our life savings," said investor Joan Sinkin.

They only have their own greed to blame.

Banks and thrifts have guarantees to $250,000 per account per institution. This couple should have diversified their holdings to include safe investments.

THEY OPTED FOR HIGHER RETURNS and got burned.

14 posted on 12/16/2008 3:47:28 AM PST by NoControllingLegalAuthority ((Barack Obama...stuck on stupid and idle as the world races by him like a bullet train...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster

Madoff’s campaign contributions:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2147183/posts?page=27#27


15 posted on 12/16/2008 3:51:58 AM PST by FreedomPoster (Obama: Carter's only chance to avoid going down in history as the worst U.S. president ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ninonitti
Here's the most staggering two sentences in the article:

The order came just days after federal prosecutors charged Madoff with securities fraud, saying he had admitted to orchestrating a massive Ponzi scheme. Madoff is free on $10 million bail after he was charged with securities fraud last week.

How can this guy be free on $10MM bail? He should be in shackles and confined in a cell for the rest of his miserable life.

16 posted on 12/16/2008 4:06:29 AM PST by ReleaseTheHounds ("The demagogue is one who preaches doctrines he knows to be untrue to men he knows to be idiots.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoControllingLegalAuthority
Meanwhile, a federal judge on Monday threw a lifesaver to investors who may have been duped, saying they need the protection of a special government reserve fund set up to help investors at failed brokerage firms.

Seems the only ones that will get burned are the tax payer/future generations. "Free market", not really, more like a market made from monopoly money where "special people" are able to recoup their mistakes courtesy of the Fed. Reserve and our friendly public servants.
17 posted on 12/16/2008 4:11:19 AM PST by rollo tomasi (Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ReleaseTheHounds

What, like Ponzi schemes are illegal? If that were the case, we wouldn’t have Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, fiat currencies, fractional reserve banking, etc etc etc etc...


18 posted on 12/16/2008 4:11:29 AM PST by ovrtaxt (It is better for civilization to be going down the drain than to be coming up it. ~Henry Allen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ninonitti

No bailout. Life is not fair, when one makes bad choices one has to pay the consequences.

When a thief breaks into your house and steals your belongings and you don’t have insurance, you lose everything. I don’t see the difference in the thief breaking into your house or wearing an expensive suit. Your belongings are gone - there was no insurance, you get no bailout. SPIC is not involved - there were no brokerage accounts.


19 posted on 12/16/2008 4:12:41 AM PST by rigelkentaurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ReleaseTheHounds

He is a dim... he will face no justice... justice in America is dead.

LLS


20 posted on 12/16/2008 4:17:59 AM PST by LibLieSlayer (MERRY CHRISTMAS!!!! so sue me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson