Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Galileo affair: history or heroic hagiography?
CMI ^ | Thomas Schirrmacher

Posted on 02/19/2009 8:50:01 PM PST by GodGunsGuts

The Galileo affair: history or heroic hagiography?

by Thomas Schirrmacher

Summary

The 17th century controversy between Galileo and the Vatican is examined. Fifteen theses are advanced, with supporting evidence, to show that the Galileo affair cannot serve as an argument for any position on the relation of religion and science. Contrary to legend, both Galileo and the Copernican system were well regarded by church officials. Galileo was the victim of his own arrogance, the envy of his colleagues and the politics of Pope Urban VIII. He was not accused of criticising the Bible, but disobeying a papal decree...

(Excerpt) Read more at creationontheweb.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: accademiadeilincei; arrogant; arthurccustance; cardinalbarberini; cardinalborgia; catholic; china; chinese; christian; collegioromano; copernican; corruption; creation; demotu; dialogo; dominican; emperorrudolfii; enemies; ernstschmutzer; evolution; faith; federicodescesi; fischerfabian; galileo; gap; hemleben; holysee; humility; inquisition; intelligentdesign; jesuits; johanneshemleben; kepler; koestler; luther; martinluther; maury; moralabsolutes; obstinate; popepaulv; popeurbanviii; princeoftuscany; ptolemaic; rome; science; sidereusnuncius; sunspots; thomaskuhn; vatican; wilhelmschultz; witness
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

1 posted on 02/19/2009 8:50:01 PM PST by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Finny; vladimir998; Coyoteman; allmendream; LeGrande; GunRunner; cacoethes_resipisco; ...

Ping!


2 posted on 02/19/2009 8:50:15 PM PST by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

Much of it is Enlightenment propoganda. Trading on Newton’s system, they looked back and represented Galileo as a prophet scorned. Most of them, especially Voltaire, had only a high schoolers understanding of Newton, but pretended to know much more. The Church was in a kind of intellectual doldrums, with no one of the stature of an Aquinas to dig into the new science and reflect on it.


3 posted on 02/19/2009 9:00:41 PM PST by RobbyS (ECCE homo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

Thanks for the ping!


4 posted on 02/19/2009 9:06:25 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts
Galileo was a scientist who believed in the trustworthiness of the Bible and sought to show that the Copernican (heliocentric) system was compatible with it.

Galileo sought the independence of scientific pursuit from religious doctrine. He argued in his Letter to the Grand Duchess Christina that whatever scientific truth one might find must be compatible with the Bible, because the Bible is infallible, and any apparent discrepancy must be due to a misinterpretation of the Bible.

Galileo was not blamed for criticising the Bible but for disobeying papal orders.

We say, pronounce, sentence, and declare that you, the said Galileo, by reason of the matters adduced in the trial, and by you confessed as above, have rendered yourself in the judgement of the Holy Office vehemently suspected of heresy, namely of having believed and held the doctrine which is false and contrary to the sacred and divine Scriptures - that the Sun is the center of the world and does not move from east to west and that the Earth moves and is not the center of the world; ...

5 posted on 02/19/2009 10:00:08 PM PST by dr_lew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

Yes,
I remember a brainwashing attempt in my first university, where we were instructed to read Galileo’s “Letter to the Grand Duchess Christina.” We were told this meant that he was an early proponent of the separation of Church and State/Science/etc. and that he was anti-religious altogether.
But a careful reading of the actual material, rather than the self serving modern or postmodern drivel that was to do our thinking for us, would cause one to draw no such conclusion.
His saying that the purpose of the bible was (something to the effect)to show us how to go to heaven, not how heaven goes, did not deny scripture as some would spin it.

This is epidemic in academia - Locke was misquoted, with ellipses often used to turn his ideas into their opposites, and Newton’s assertion that the Church Father’s non-use of a particular Trinitarian passage of scripture was probable evidence that it did not read so in their time is used to say that he was non-Trinitarian, rather than an early textual critic. [Perhaps he was non-Trinitarian, however, this passage alone can not be used to support this theory :) ]

Modern man wants to justify itself by pointing to people who did not and could not share the same premises and say that they are drawn from same well. Then it wants to pretend that empiricism and “scientific” thought led to what it now calls the failure of the enlightenment experiment (in bloodshed) but will somehow lead to a different end, because we know better now. Posh.


6 posted on 02/19/2009 10:14:48 PM PST by Apogee (vade in pace (end of late night rambling))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl

Galileo is a satellite system that Boeing couldn’t get the shelves on the satellite to respond correctly. Down in El Sugundo. Big ones to be launched by big rockets. They have microwave anechoic ranges that you can drive a truck through. Sometimes things just don’t work.


7 posted on 02/19/2009 10:20:35 PM PST by BobS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BobS

Thank you for sharing your insights, dear BobS!


8 posted on 02/19/2009 10:27:27 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

Atheists in particular grossly exaggerate the injustice done to Galileo, but that shouldn’t obscure the fact that he did suffer an injustice.


9 posted on 02/19/2009 10:35:49 PM PST by Mogwai (You say "far right" like that's a bad thing, Arlen!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Apogee
I remember a brainwashing attempt in my first university, where we were instructed to read Galileo’s “Letter to the Grand Duchess Christina.” We were told this meant that he was an early proponent of the separation of Church and State/Science/etc. and that he was anti-religious altogether. But a careful reading of the actual material, rather than the self serving modern or postmodern drivel that was to do our thinking for us, would cause one to draw no such conclusion. His saying that the purpose of the bible was (something to the effect)to show us how to go to heaven, not how heaven goes, did not deny scripture as some would spin it.

Yes, he credits "an ecclesiastic of the most eminent degree" with the epigram: "That the intention of the Holy Ghost is to teach us how one goes to heaven, not how the the heavens go."

But this is a very clear expression of the separation of scientific and religious matters which you attribute to brainwashing.

10 posted on 02/19/2009 10:50:32 PM PST by dr_lew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts; All
What's funny (but not "ha-ha" funny) in all this is that, to the extent Galileo was persecuted, he was persecuted for erring from Ptolemy, not the Bible.
11 posted on 02/20/2009 5:26:04 AM PST by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus (Nihil utile nisi quod honestum - Marcus Tullius Cicero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
What's funny (but not "ha-ha" funny) in all this is that, to the extent Galileo was persecuted, he was persecuted for erring from Ptolemy, not the Bible.

To the extent...it was a very, very small extent. And it was because he made a pledge and reneged on it. He didn't have to make the pledge.
12 posted on 02/20/2009 5:28:47 AM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts
This is barely entertaining any more. Galileo was persecuted by the church for conducting and believeing scientific inquiry that contradicted the literal reading of the bible. Today, we fully accept the concepts that he was persecuted for, except, it seems for a few posters here and the shameless, echo-chamber, "look at me I'm a REAL Christian and you're not!" creationinst web sites from which you post and draw your inspiration. Thank God (and I mean that literally) your brand of "science" is not to be found in the public schools.
13 posted on 02/20/2009 6:12:17 AM PST by Buck W. (The President of the United States IS named Schickelgruber...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buck W.
Indeed.

It is still chilling to think that the Vatican once had a say in scientific matters. I'm glad we have progressed, and the theocrats are losing big time.

14 posted on 02/20/2009 7:04:36 AM PST by GunRunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: GunRunner

You wrote:

“It is still chilling to think that the Vatican once had a say in scientific matters.”

It did? When? Does the US government have a say in scientific matters when it bans the cloning of human beings?

“I’m glad we have progressed, and the theocrats are losing big time.”

Yeah, that starry future with human clones, cyborg enhanced human brains, DNA threads spliced free of diseases, organ harvesting, etc....yeah, that’s so much to look forward to.


15 posted on 02/20/2009 5:25:14 PM PST by vladimir998 (Ignorance of Scripture is ignorance of Christ. St. Jerome)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: vladimir998
Are you a theocrat? Do I have to submit to your religious beliefs when it comes to science and technology?

Yeah, go ahead and use your straw men of cloning and "organ harvesting" (which is a stupid myth created by people opposed to organ donation).

I look forward to a day when 6,000 year old Earthers share the fate of the Flat Earth Society and the Temperance League.

16 posted on 02/20/2009 11:52:45 PM PST by GunRunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts; informavoracious; larose; RJR_fan; Prospero; Conservative Vermont Vet; ...
+

Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:

Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of interest.

Obama Says A Baby Is A Punishment

Obama: “If they make a mistake, I don’t want them punished with a baby.”

17 posted on 02/20/2009 11:55:34 PM PST by narses (http://www.theobamadisaster.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dr_lew
Well, Galileo was wrong. (tee-hee!)
18 posted on 02/21/2009 12:09:05 AM PST by TimSkalaBim (Let's have some heliocentric fun!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TimSkalaBim
Galileo was famously wrong on many particulars. My personal favorite is his botched attempt to derive the law of centripetal force, which Newton summarily dispatched in Lemma XI of Book I:

The evanescent subtense to the angle of contact, in all curves which at the point of contact have a finite curvature, is ultimately as the square of the subtense of the conterminous arc.

Ho ho! How did he miss that one?

19 posted on 02/21/2009 12:26:47 AM PST by dr_lew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Mogwai
Atheists in particular grossly exaggerate the injustice done to Galileo, but that shouldn’t obscure the fact that he did suffer an injustice.

The greatness of Galileo is acknowledged by everyone, like that of Einstein; but unlike the latter, whom we are honoring today before the College of Cardinals in the apostolic palace, the former had to suffer a great deal - we cannot conceal the fact - at the hands of men and organisms of the Church. - Pope John Paul II

cited in

GALILEO : For Copernicanism and for the Church
Vatican Observatory Publications
by Annibale Fantoli

20 posted on 02/21/2009 12:47:03 AM PST by dr_lew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson