"They need more...'tinfoil'...?"
ping
bttt
Bump
I am sure he is a non political guy. He was not chosen by the Obama administrtion for sure. Is this something to seriously worry about. A clerk?
"They need more...'tinfoil'...?"
Somebody said a few weeks ago: “We found out more about “Joe The Plumber” in two days than we could about Obama in two years.”
Maybe we need to have someone “Plumb” Danny Bickle?
Think he was the guy in “Taxi Driver”.. No, that was Travis.
Ref
“I Did It-Justice Roberts Agreed....”
Ref
http://gunnyg.wordpress.com/2009/03/14/i-did-it-justice-roberts-agreed-to-read-all-of-my-documents/
Excellent questions indeed.
Can some folks please come up with some serious answers? This question is not a joke.
Thank you.
Is there any video of this encounter with Justice Roberts yesterday?
The first thing that needs to happen is to find out the correct spelling of his name. See -
ussc "stay clerk" Danny Bickell
ussc "stay clerk" Danny Bickle
Forget social security, overturning an election in the courts has to be the true third rail of American politics.
Who is John Gault?
I found this info
Danny Bickell
Deputy Clerk
Supreme Court of the United States
Washington, DC 20543
from The Association of Government Attorneys in Capital Litigation.
http://www.agacl.com/speakers.htm
I would assume they have his name spelled correctly. He was on their list of speakers for their 30th annual conference.
bump to follow
Dr. Taitz should file a complaint with her U.S. Congressman, Rep. Gary Miller (R-CA), 42nd District. A letter of inquiry to the US Supreme Court from a Congressman will get an immediate response.
Danny should be investigated with a fine tooth flea comb.
It looks as if he sabotaged at least three of these natural born citizen suits, and possibly more.
http://www.google.com/search?q=danny+bickell&sourceid=ie7&rls=com.microsoft:en-US&ie=utf8&oe=utf8
Something I found posted:
ch wrote:
Danny Bickle works at the Supreme Court, and was very discourteous to lawyers trying to interact with the Court. It is thought he and others might have manipulated the docket system and flow of cases for review. Effort is being made to see if the legal cases actually reached any of the justices, and if so, why were they not heard, instead of the insignificant cases by comparison that they were hearing at that time. Employee abuse and intrigue at the Supreme Court.