1 posted on
05/22/2009 7:28:29 AM PDT by
GOP_Lady
To: GOP_Lady
>>Light cars are dangerous cars<<
DUH!
To: GOP_Lady
Obama will regret following in Hitler's footsteps decreeing that we have a new people's car.
3 posted on
05/22/2009 7:32:23 AM PDT by
a fool in paradise
(If you like the Dept. of Motor Vehicles, the IRS, and the Post Office, you'll love govt Health Care)
To: GOP_Lady
Smaller cars are more dangerous?
Mr. Obama doesn’t care.
When is he going to begin driving around in a hybrid limo?
Never.
Besides, he’s too busy traveling around the world apologizing for the United States - the worst country in the world.
Well, if it’s such a dreadful place, how did he get elected?
I’ll be the mids at Annapolis are just dying to hear Mr. Obama speak at their commencement today.
4 posted on
05/22/2009 7:32:30 AM PDT by
RexBeach
("Do your duty in all things." Robert E. Lee)
To: GOP_Lady
Smart cars are for stupid people.
5 posted on
05/22/2009 7:33:39 AM PDT by
Long Island Pete
(Stupidity is in the DNA of liberals.)
To: GOP_Lady
6 posted on
05/22/2009 7:37:31 AM PDT by
GOP_Lady
To: GOP_Lady
Don’t worry, they have already come up with the answer for this. New 30 MPH speed limits will make everyone safer, save fuel and reduce emissions all at the same time. (I would put a sarcasm tag on but I’m afraid it would be misplaced.)
To: GOP_Lady
12 posted on
05/22/2009 7:49:05 AM PDT by
KeyLargo
To: GOP_Lady
I hear this repeated, but I wonder how true it is. If the mass of the car is reduced, then it has less momentum as it travels and collides with other stuff and so will do less damage to that other stuff, which may or may not be a low mass car. Whatever it is, assuming it isn't a tree, there will be people involved who will probably be more lightly injured than if they collided with a Mack Truck.
ML/NJ
14 posted on
05/22/2009 7:55:21 AM PDT by
ml/nj
To: GOP_Lady
The list of “how” idiotic leftist ideas kill is nearly infinite ... beginning with DDT and continuing to the present.
For whatever reason, I believe the left are generally people nature never meant to survive or breed.
15 posted on
05/22/2009 7:56:18 AM PDT by
mgc1122
To: GOP_Lady
No, they aren’t.
Forcing them to be smaller before the technology exists to make them safe at that size is another matter.
To: GOP_Lady
Not if all cars are ‘light’. Think of bumper car derby.
24 posted on
05/22/2009 8:18:58 AM PDT by
Lorianne
To: GOP_Lady
If they’re forced to drive around in tiny little deathtraps, maybe Americans will learn to drive better. It seems like as our cars get safer, our drivers become more dangerous.
25 posted on
05/22/2009 8:19:28 AM PDT by
ZirconEncrustedTweezers
(Whoever coined the term "foolproof" underestimated the ingenuity and determination of fools.)
To: GOP_Lady
Thats why I love my monster Chrysler!
30 posted on
05/22/2009 8:57:28 AM PDT by
SRT8 man
To: GOP_Lady
32 posted on
05/22/2009 9:28:15 AM PDT by
doug from upland
(10 million views of .HILLARY! UNCENSORED - put some ice on it, witch)
To: GOP_Lady
yeah so while these enviro-liberals gets away driving their 7 mpg hummers, limos and luxury jets the rest of us are going to be driving 50 mpg 4 wheeled soda can coffins!!
One bump while driving one of these 4 wheeled soda can coffins and you're history, after all the Environmental causes trumps human safety where this evil govt is concerned!!
40 posted on
05/22/2009 11:16:37 AM PDT by
prophetic
(God, let 0Bama and his evil plans for this country fail & let him be utterly disgraced like HAMAN!!)
To: GOP_Lady
I’m not driving his soup can cars. He can kiss my a**.
41 posted on
05/22/2009 11:17:07 AM PDT by
mojitojoe
( Idiots elected a Marxist ideologue with narcissistic personality disorder)
To: GOP_Lady
47 posted on
05/22/2009 12:42:22 PM PDT by
SuperLuminal
(Where is another agitator for republicanism like Sam Adams when we need him?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
