1 posted on
05/28/2009 5:34:54 PM PDT by
xzins
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
To: xzins
What makes Casey think 2009 will be a repeat of 1951-1953? It might look more like August 1945.
To: xzins
90 days? We wouldn't have 90 minutes to defend Seoul.
3 posted on
05/28/2009 5:37:28 PM PDT by
Lurker
(The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
To: xzins
Are the SK’s gonna join the fight or is this one all ours?
4 posted on
05/28/2009 5:37:58 PM PDT by
randog
(Tap into America!)
To: xzins
You don’t have shift any gears if you use the right weapon!
5 posted on
05/28/2009 5:38:04 PM PDT by
Red_Devil 232
(VietVet - USMC All Ready On The Right? All Ready On The Left? All Ready On The Firing Line!)
To: AdmSmith; Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; george76; ...
What kind of naval assets do we have in the vicinity? Unleashing UAVs on the Pyongyang dictatorship would slow ‘em down some.
7 posted on
05/28/2009 5:38:53 PM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________ Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
To: xzins
Well Obambi, you may get an object lesson why those F22s are more needed than you thought.
North Korea would probably have some help from other nations.
9 posted on
05/28/2009 5:40:15 PM PDT by
DoughtyOne
(Obama is mentally a child of ten. Just remember that when he makes statements and issues policy.)
To: xzins
If we are not prepared to use any and all weapons we have available, we might as well stay home and this president will not use what we have.
12 posted on
05/28/2009 5:41:32 PM PDT by
Graybeard58
(32 shopping days to Graybeard58's 64th. b/day. Selah.)
To: xzins
This is all BS. Just move the USS Ronald Reagan and the USS GHW Bush over there and N. Korea would be turned into a parking lot in a day and a half.
It’s too bad our current CiC doesn’t have the balls to defend us. He will send the hildabeast over to talk.
To: xzins
The South Koreans have been buying a lot of smart weapons. The North Korean military is still largely equipped with 1970’s-era weaponry, and their training is pathetic. Seoul would be flattened, but the North would be toast.
18 posted on
05/28/2009 5:45:55 PM PDT by
GL of Sector 2814
(One man's "magic" is another man's engineering. "Supernatural" is a null word. -- R A Heinlein)
To: xzins
South Korea has substantial capability this time, unlike before.
The North has little to no capability to fight a long war and China is very, very unlikely to send troops this time.
The North could shell Seoul, but a biological attack would invite a nuclear response.....
Crap, I forgot who POTUS is. Yea, the we're screwed.
22 posted on
05/28/2009 5:51:53 PM PDT by
SampleMan
(Socialism enslaves you & kills your soul.)
To: xzins
nah...just nuke um to hell
call it good
To: xzins
Bull crap. Artillery and tank gunnery skills are very perishable and unfortunately, may have to be re-aquired via blood.
25 posted on
05/28/2009 5:54:15 PM PDT by
Redleg Duke
("Sarah Palin...Unleashing the Fury of the Castrated Left!")
To: xzins
It would take the Army time to "shift gears" if it needed to fight against North Korea, Army Chief of Staff Gen. George Casey said Thursday. Army?
Who needs it we have Obama to talk them to death.
35 posted on
05/28/2009 5:58:56 PM PDT by
EGPWS
(Trust in God, question everyone else)
To: xzins
Why have nukes if aren’t gonna use them?
36 posted on
05/28/2009 5:59:36 PM PDT by
Dallas59
("You know the one with the big ears? He might be yours, but he ain't my president.")
To: xzins
Somebody needs to tell Uncle Kim that Cold War fighting is not allowed.
39 posted on
05/28/2009 6:01:08 PM PDT by
VeniVidiVici
(Putin warned Obama not to pursue Marxism. Obama has ignored him.)
To: xzins
We don’t have to shift anything if we nuke them.
44 posted on
05/28/2009 6:05:10 PM PDT by
TomasUSMC
( FIGHT LIKE WW2, FINISH LIKE WW2. FIGHT LIKE NAM, FINISH LIKE NAM)
To: xzins
Problem is the opening artillery and rocket attack would hurt S. Korea very bad. We could take out many of the guns pretty quick, but not before a lot of damage could be done.
That and we don't have a whole lot of troops on the ground there.
56 posted on
05/28/2009 6:11:07 PM PDT by
redgolum
("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
To: devolve; ntnychik; PhilDragoo; MeekOneGOP; dixiechick2000; All; xzins
58 posted on
05/28/2009 6:11:09 PM PDT by
potlatch
To: xzins
It would take the Army time to "shift gears" if it needed to fight against North Korea, Army Chief of Staff Gen. George Casey said Thursday.There is no possibility that Obama OR the Congress will fight in Korea.
But that's OK, because the war is here.
59 posted on
05/28/2009 6:12:41 PM PDT by
Jim Noble
(Pas d'ennmis a droit)
To: xzins
No more Task Force Charlie?
60 posted on
05/28/2009 6:12:42 PM PDT by
CHATTAB
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
