Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Army National Guard Recruiting FEMA Camp Or 'Internment/Resettlement' Specialists
Canada Free Press ^ | August 5, 2009 | staff

Posted on 08/08/2009 6:38:12 AM PDT by kellynla

The Army National Guard is now recruiting individuals to fill job positions described as an internment/resettlement specialist according to job postings on Monster.Com and other employment based Internet sites such as one listed here. In other words, they are recruiting individuals to man facilities that could be used to house political dissidents, so-called terrorists and other individuals that the government doesn’t like. The term “resettlement” indicates that individuals holding this job position could also be responsible for moving people to other locations against their will. It is a documented fact that the U.S. government has numerous facilities at their disposal that could easily be used to house large numbers of people. Combine that, with this new job posting by the Army National Guard, and it seems as if the U.S. government is continuing to prepare for an eventual popular uprising.

Let’s look at some of the evidence we have of the U.S. government’s intentions to establish the infrastructure that could be used to house large numbers of political dissidents, so-called terrorists and other individuals the U.S. government wants locked up.

HR 645 the National Emergency Centers Establishment Act is a proposed bill in the U.S. House of Representatives that would authorize FEMA to build no less than six National Emergency Centers throughout the U.S. on closed or open military facilities. These facilities are to be designed to house large numbers of people. Why would emergency centers need to be built on closed or open military facilities unless there was a need to keep people from coming in and out of them?

(Excerpt) Read more at canadafreepress.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: army; bho44; bhofema; camp; camps; cwiiping; fema; femacamps; internment; nationalguard
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 181-182 next last
To: Ditter

Was there a job ad like this under George W. Bush?


61 posted on 08/08/2009 7:25:28 AM PDT by autumnraine (You can't fix stupid, but you can vote it out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Here’s the job ad.

http://jobview.monster.com/Corrections-Officer-–-Internment-Resettlement-Specialist-Job-US-82289270.aspx

I guess it is all in how you define “Internment” and “Resettlement” Why have a whole job category for a few terrorist here and there?


62 posted on 08/08/2009 7:27:00 AM PDT by 1Remnant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia
Police State: New Legislation Authorizes FEMA Camps In U.S.

HR Bill 645

63 posted on 08/08/2009 7:28:18 AM PDT by rintense (Senior Marketing / IT / UX architect unemployed and looking for work. Freepmail me if you have leads)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: autumnraine

For those who have not been in the military epically our Canadian friends this is the description for the 31E MOS been around for a long time and easy to verify with a 2 second Google search. For you civilians out there the military talks funny...


64 posted on 08/08/2009 7:30:18 AM PDT by montanajoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: taxtruth

This is health care reform. Free!!! Come on folkes. Free education and free food and free health. (sarc off)


65 posted on 08/08/2009 7:31:14 AM PDT by JudgemAll (control freaks, their world & their problem with my gun and my protecting my private party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: freeangel

You know, I don’t believe every German person was evil and maniacal. Somehow though, they managed to do what no rational person would ever think they would do in an irrational time.

I never thought I’d see the President call a police officer stupid for arresting his friend on national TV during a press conference. I never thought I’d see members of an administration encourage people to bring a ‘gun to a knife fight’, or ‘get in their face’, or even use terms like ‘punch back’ when encouraging their base to work on a bill they wanted passed.

There are a lot of things that have occured in the past six months that even I couldn’t comprehend, even as bad as I imagined Obama to be. He has surpassed anything I ever imagined. So it’s not unreasonable when we see actual ads for our military for ‘interrment camps’ to become a little frightened.

I would HOPE our military would fight back against these orders, but forgive me for not being as confident as I was 7 months ago.


66 posted on 08/08/2009 7:31:23 AM PDT by autumnraine (You can't fix stupid, but you can vote it out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: djf
Exactly how many of our seasoned military leadership will lead these young foolish sheep?

I don't mean to sound harsh, but I'm really getting tired of seeing people on this website accusing our military of recruiting people to throw them in reeducation camps as they risk their lives defending freedom. This is not a job directly under White House supervision. You are accusing our current military leadership of condoning and actively supporting the internment and reeducation of our citizenry.

67 posted on 08/08/2009 7:32:42 AM PDT by armymarinedad (Support, v., To take the side of; to uphold or help.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: armymarinedad
Provide counseling and guidance to individual prisoners within a rehabilitative program

As in the above quote, the job qualifications require the ability to communicate with the expected prisoners.

Yet they do not appear to require proficiency in other languages. So it must be that they expect the "individual prisoners" to be english speaking.

It isn't too hard to connect these dots, is it?

68 posted on 08/08/2009 7:33:34 AM PDT by Iron Munro (You can't kill the beast while sucking at its teat - Claire Wolfe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: rintense
This is the Hurricane Andrew/Katrina legislation. The most suspicious part is its sponsor. It has been stalled in subcommittee since February.

"Directs the Secretary of Homeland Security to establish at least six national emergency centers on military installations to use existing infrastructure to provide: (1) temporary housing, medical, and humanitarian assistance to individuals and families dislocated due to an emergency or major disaster; and (2) centralized locations for the training of first responders and the coordination of preparedness, response, and recovery efforts.

"Lists minimum requirements for sites for such centers, including that they be capable of: (1) meeting for an extended period the housing, health, transportation, education, public works, humanitarian, and other transition needs of a large number of individuals affected; (2) being scaled up or down to accommodate major disaster preparedness and response drills, operations, and procedures; (3) housing existing permanent structures necessary to meet training and first responders coordination requirements during non-disaster periods; and (4) hosting the infrastructure necessary to rapidly adjust to temporary housing, medical, and humanitarian assistance needs.

"Sets forth center location requirements, including requiring the Secretary to designate closed military installations as sites whenever possible and to designate portions of existing military installations as centers otherwise."

69 posted on 08/08/2009 7:35:05 AM PDT by La Lydia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
Operation Garden Plot defines tax protesters, militia groups, religious cults, and general anti-government dissenters as Disruptive Elements.
70 posted on 08/08/2009 7:35:17 AM PDT by Alice in Wonderland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia

If its stalled, then why are they recruiting people?


71 posted on 08/08/2009 7:36:32 AM PDT by rintense (Senior Marketing / IT / UX architect unemployed and looking for work. Freepmail me if you have leads)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: armymarinedad

You are accusing our current military leadership of condoning and actively supporting the internment and reeducation of our citizenry.

Please show me where I did that.

I am asking questions. Just like alot of other folks.


72 posted on 08/08/2009 7:36:52 AM PDT by djf (The "racism" spiel is a crutch, those who unashamedly lean on it, cripples!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia
Yeah, that and like the need to “evacuate and house” Japanese-Americans in the 1940’s.
73 posted on 08/08/2009 7:37:57 AM PDT by SUSSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: autumnraine
I seriously doubt it but that didn't stop the dims from scaring themselves silly over the possibility. They will ignore this because their guy is doing it. Some of them may react negatively but the hardcore ones won't.
74 posted on 08/08/2009 7:38:46 AM PDT by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Iron Munro
So you think our senior military leadership has stopped defending the Constitution and and now wants to put you in a reeducation camp?
75 posted on 08/08/2009 7:40:38 AM PDT by armymarinedad (Support, v., To take the side of; to uphold or help.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: rintense

They have been recruiting people for these jobs on and off for several years, beginning in the Bush administration. The legislation you cited is to authorize (not fund) construction. It does not deal with National Guard recruiting in any way, authorization or appropriation, indeed, it does not mention it at all.


76 posted on 08/08/2009 7:41:30 AM PDT by La Lydia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: freeangel

“........ I believe much of the National Guard is there because they hold freedoms of US citizens at the very heart of their enlistments.”

I would hope that what you say is true. However, the thread seems to be revolving around what the National Guard would actually DO in such a situation. As an arm of the government, that could include executing unconstitutional measures against the country’s own citizens. Would the NG actually follow such orders?

Historically, the west coast US citizens of Japanese extraction might speak to what the military has done in the past. The outlines of those internmnent camps (they were NOT POW camps), can still be seen from the air in eastern Colorado. It has not been that long ago since the rights of US citizens were violated by their government through the actions of the military. Unfortunately, I am not nearly as optimistic about the NG’s concern for individual rights (though some within the ranks might decide to have nothing to do with such orders, I fear that the majority would comply as they have in the past).

Maybe they’d come through shining, but history does not support such a blue sky assumption.


77 posted on 08/08/2009 7:42:05 AM PDT by Habibi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious
... this kind of story has appeared before,

This is not a "story that has appeared before".

This is an actual ad from monster.com.

78 posted on 08/08/2009 7:43:03 AM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia

Its all tied together. Considering the current administration, I don’t trust them to adhere to the ‘magnanimous’ intent of the bill, do you?


79 posted on 08/08/2009 7:44:03 AM PDT by rintense (Senior Marketing / IT / UX architect unemployed and looking for work. Freepmail me if you have leads)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: armymarinedad
There was a thread on military photos.net and I was surprised to read the posts of guys that identified themselves as military personnel. It was clear that they took the phrase 'threats foreign and domestic' very seriously, and had a gung-ho attitude toward 'taking out the domestic threat'.

Of course, blind faith that the government is the final arbiter of what is a threat to the Constitution was implicit. I would venture to say that it was inconceivable to these guys that they themselves might be the 'domestic threat' referred to in the Constitution.

80 posted on 08/08/2009 7:44:06 AM PDT by servantoftheservant (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 181-182 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson