[blueyon]

To funny, go after Pres Bush for his lawyers legal interpretation of the law but make Obama's opinion stand.

This administration is to funny...hypocrisy knows no bounds

[gimme1ibertee]

Funny..if it wasn’t so damned serious.

[cripplecreek]

So the president should be a dictator.

[Da Coyote]

Keep it up, Sunstein, Pedlosi’s fears are going to be recognized.

[Qwackertoo]

I can’t believe the Senate confirmed this nut job.

[J40000]

WHY did we stop with Van Jones?!?!?!?!?!?!

Come on folks, we have MANY more vermin to rid our White House of...

Like THIS one.

[Tax-chick]

... in the face of statutory ambiguity ...

There's the money phrase. Congress has so totally fallen down on the job, they all should get what the Russian legislature got.

[FES0844]

Frightening.

[listenhillary]

What say you House of Representatives? Senators? Supreme court judges?

The checks and balances are being forgotten.

[Past Your Eyes]

Heck, I'll even throw in an extra o and call it too funny.

[rbg81]

And, of course, this only applies to Obama—not past US Presidents. After all, Obama is “the ONE”.

[Rodm]

And they wonder why people compare him to Schicklgruber

[silverleaf]

Let’s change that headline to “Pres Bush and VP Cheney, not courts, should interpret law”

then watch liberal heads explode

[InterceptPoint]

The outcome should instead depend on the commitments and beliefs of the President and those who operate under him ...

That sort of system worked quite well for Stalin. It could be just as effective under Obama. It would be the Liberal's Ultimate Dream: A Living Constitution interpreted by the Obama-Emanuel-Axelrod Triumvirate.

[penelopesire]

Now we know why the boy king really chose him...lol.

[chris37]

Good, then we don’t need your pedophile looking ass in any of our courts, but most importantly the SCOTUS, do we, Cass?

[MamaTexan]

Obama, not courts, should interpret law

The federal government wasn't instituted to 'interpret' the Law, but to FOLLOW it.

[rockinqsranch]

Wondering what was the discussion during the confirmation debate, or was there any. The guy is mental.

[SE Mom]

Sunstein goes on:

...In his book, Sunstein laid out what he wants to become the new bill of rights, which he calls the Second Bill of Rights:

Among his mandates are:

The right to a useful and remunerative job in the industries or shops or farms or mines of the nation;

The right to earn enough to provide adequate food and clothing and recreation;

The right of every farmer to raise and sell his products at a return which will give him and his family a decent living;

The right of every businessman, large and small, to trade in an atmosphere of freedom from unfair competition and domination by monopolies at home or abroad;

The right of every family to a decent home;

The right to adequate medical care and the opportunity to achieve and enjoy good health;

The right to adequate protection from the economic fears of old age, sickness, accident, and unemployment;

The right to a good education.
On one page in his book, Sunstein claims he is “not seriously arguing” his bill of rights be “encompassed by anything in the Constitution,” but on the next page he states that “if the nation becomes committed to certain rights, they may migrate into the Constitution itself.”

Later in the book, Sunstein argues that “at a minimum, the second bill should be seen as part and parcel of America’s constitutive commitments.”

[pray4liberty]

"There is no reason to believe that in the face of statutory ambiguity, the meaning of federal law should be settled by the inclinations and predispositions of federal judges. The outcome should instead depend on the commitments and beliefs of the President and those who operate under him," argued Sunstein.

This guy is on meth, I swear.

[blueyon]

America, this is your 3 A.M. call........... WAKE UP!!!