Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Republicans who endorsed Holder have second thoughts
Washington Examiner ^ | November 17, 2009 | Byron York

Posted on 11/17/2009 3:35:57 AM PST by gusopol3

Last January, several Republican legal stars wrote a letter to the Senate Judiciary Committee supporting Eric Holder's nomination to be attorney general. Now, in light of Holder's decision to grant 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed full American constitutional rights and try him in federal court in New York, some of those veteran lawyers are having second thoughts.

The January letter called Holder an "extraordinary lawyer" of "unfailing integrity" who is "superbly qualified" to lead the Justice Department and whose appointment as the first African-American attorney general "should be hailed as a milestone." "From his experience Eric fully understands and appreciates the constant threat posed by al Qaeda and Islamic extremists," the GOP lawyers wrote. "[He] is the right man at the right time to protect our citizens in the critical years ahead."

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 911mastermind; bho44; bhodoj; buyersremorse; byronyork; digenova; digenovatoensing; holder; ksm; obamacans; toensing; toolate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last
I'm amazed that DiGenova and Toensing signed in the first place, and even more amazed they are surprised.
1 posted on 11/17/2009 3:35:58 AM PST by gusopol3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: gusopol3

I guess you can fool most of the people, most of the time.


2 posted on 11/17/2009 3:38:13 AM PST by tommyboy (We'll do it live)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gusopol3
Last January, several Republican legal stars wrote a letter to the Senate Judiciary Committee supporting Eric Holder's nomination to be attorney general.

I have a 4 year old niece that isn't this naive.

3 posted on 11/17/2009 3:43:12 AM PST by numberonepal (Don't Even Think About Treading On Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tommyboy

Nov. 4, 2008, proves your point, and there was Julie Nixon Eisenhower for icing on the cake!


4 posted on 11/17/2009 3:45:25 AM PST by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: numberonepal

They were just trying to get on good sides with the popular media in hopes of being invited to “talk” shows.


5 posted on 11/17/2009 3:46:02 AM PST by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: gusopol3

That’s what living and working inside the Beltway for years and drinking the water will do for you. Even our best get corrupted in time.


6 posted on 11/17/2009 3:47:08 AM PST by abb ("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gusopol3
I am completely nonplussed that Joe DiGenova would recommend Holder.

When DiGenova was at Justice he was one tough cookie of a prosecutor.

7 posted on 11/17/2009 3:48:06 AM PST by Jimmy Valentine (DemocRATS - when they speak, they lie; when they are silent, they are stealing the American Dream)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gusopol3
Why does this always happen to the GOP?

It wasn't like Eric Holder made it a point to hide who he is or what he stands for.

8 posted on 11/17/2009 3:48:12 AM PST by pnh102 (Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
They were just trying to get on good sides with the popular media

That's true + they (and many others) are fearful of legitimately criticizing a black man.

9 posted on 11/17/2009 3:49:31 AM PST by NewLand (We shall all hang together or most assuredly we will all hang separately)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: gusopol3

Fools.


10 posted on 11/17/2009 3:51:17 AM PST by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin has crossed the Rubicon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gusopol3

Discernment is the thing that was missing here...

All the education and position in the world wont buy someone that...


11 posted on 11/17/2009 3:52:02 AM PST by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gusopol3
That endorsement was quite the laundry list of grotesquely overblown plaudits. Just signing that near-parody backslapping-on-steroids lessened them all.

Actions have consequences.

Mr. niteowl77

12 posted on 11/17/2009 3:55:41 AM PST by niteowl77 (You wanted him, and now you have got him. I say, "Good day to you," America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
Julie Nixon Eisenhower supported Obama for President in 2008. According to Federal Election Commission records, Eisenhower made the maximum contribution of $2,300 to the Obama campaign in 2008. [wikipedia.com & ABC News]
13 posted on 11/17/2009 4:05:00 AM PST by drpix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: gusopol3

I say BS! These filthy corrupt republicans knew very well who they were voting for, this article is just another ruse to let the RINOs off the hook. I am so sick of the filth that is our congress - lies, corruptness, idiocy and greed.


14 posted on 11/17/2009 4:09:19 AM PST by sasafras (TIME FOR A RESURGENCE - FREEDOM IS NOT FREE - NO MORE COMPLAINING - LET'S GET BUSY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NewLand

They could have kept their fat little fingers away from a pen. That is the whole problem with the republican party. They have lived inside the Belchway for so long, their heads are permanently up their arses, and they have no republican qualities.


15 posted on 11/17/2009 4:10:23 AM PST by healy61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: gusopol3
“extraordinary lawyer” of “unfailing integrity” who is “superbly qualified” There was NEVER any reason to say anything like this about Holder, but lawyers are often lawyers before they are Americans and this seems to be the case here.
16 posted on 11/17/2009 4:11:02 AM PST by jmaroneps37 (Conservatism is truth. Liberalism is lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gusopol3

Has the GOP forgotten the Clinton years and Holder’s involvement in everything evil???????


17 posted on 11/17/2009 4:24:31 AM PST by Highest Authority (DemonRats are pure EVIL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gusopol3

Shysters supporting a liar, a racist and a crook. I’m not surprised. Rodents tend to embrace their own kind.


18 posted on 11/17/2009 4:28:03 AM PST by sergeantdave (obuma is the anti-Lincoln, trying to re-establish slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gusopol3
Lies... anyone endorsing that pos racist anti American commie has no “thoughts”. They do not have the proper tools to have “thoughts”.

LLS

19 posted on 11/17/2009 4:29:40 AM PST by LibLieSlayer (hussama will never be my president... NEVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gusopol3

Surprise, surprise and too late smart. Like you, am surprised as well, at their surprise.


20 posted on 11/17/2009 4:32:34 AM PST by cricket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson