Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China Struggles To Build An F-22
Startegy Page ^ | November 17, 2009

Posted on 11/17/2009 7:28:43 AM PST by myknowledge

The Chinese Air Force has announced that it has a F-22 type aircraft ready to make its first flight within a year. The Chinese believe this aircraft will enter service within ten years. U.S. intelligence believes the Chinese are nowhere near this kind of capability. But given the quantity and quality of data Chinese hackers have been stealing in the past five years, it's possible that they have much of the American technology that makes the F-22 and F-35 possible. Some believe that the Chinese also have a F-35 type design in the works as well.

American intel analysts believe that Chinese aviation technology (both design and manufacturing) is not yet capable of producing F-22/F-35 class aircraft. Given the experience with the first two Chinese designed and manufactured jet fighters (J-10 and JF-17), there is much doubt that China is capable of making the leap to F-22 class fighters. The big bottleneck is jet engine technology.

For two decades now, China has been developing the manufacturing technology for aircraft engines, the key component of any high performance aircraft. So far, China has been unable to create the manufacturing technology and personnel skills that are needed to make the engines for their most advanced jet fighters. For example, China is a major customer for Russian RD93 engines (originally designed for the MiG-29), and has bought over a thousand of them. The RD93 engines currently cost about $2.5 million each.

China has been developing a similar (apparently identical) engine to the RD93, the WS-13. Actually, this effort is being aided by Russia, which is selling China technology needed for the manufacture of key engine components. Russia isn't happy about this, because they don't want competition in the low cost jet engine market. Then again, China has a history of stealing technology it cannot buy, so the Russians are making the best of a bad situation. China says the WS-13 is nearly ready for service. Maybe, maybe not. Recently, China ordered another hundred RD93s. Building high performance military jet engines is difficult, and China has had problems mastering this kind of stuff. Not that they will not eventually acquire the skills, but until they do, they need the Russian made RD93s. Officially, more RD93 are being bought because China cannot produce enough of their WS-13s.

Chinese engineers also thought they had managed to master the manufacturing techniques needed to make a Chinese copy of the Russian AL31F engine. This Chinese copy, the WS10A, was meant for the Chinese J-10 fighter, which entered service two years ago. But the Chinese Air Force was not satisfied with the reliability or performance of the WS10A, and have ordered another hundred AL31Fs from Russia, in order to continue building J-10s. Meanwhile, Russian efforts to build an improved AL31 for their own F-22 competitor, have run into serious problems. Will the Chinese suddenly do better than their tutors?

The J-10 is the first modern jet fighter designed and built in China. The aircraft is an attempt to create a modern fighter-bomber that could compete with foreign designs. The experiment was not completely successful. Work on the J-10 began over twenty years ago, in an attempt to develop an aircraft that could compete with the Russian MiG-29s and Su-27s, and the American F-16. But the first prototype did not fly until 1998. There were problems, and it wasn't until 2000 that the basic design flaws were fixed. By 2002, nine prototypes had been built, and flight testing was going forward to find, and fix, hundreds of smaller problems. It was a great learning experience for Chinese engineers, but it was becoming apparent that the J-10 was not going to be competitive with the Su-27s/30s China was buying from Russia. The J-10 looks something like the American F-16, and weighs about the same (19 tons). Like the F-16, and unlike the Su-27, the J-10 has only one engine.

The 13 ton JF-17, which uses the RD93, is meant to be a low cost alternative to the American F-16. It was developed in cooperation with Pakistan. The JF-17 is considered the equal to earlier versions of the F-16, but only 80 percent as effective as more recent F-16 models. The JF-17 design is based on a cancelled Russian project, the MiG-33. Most of the JF-17 electronics (in the Pakistani version) are Western, with Italian firms being major suppliers. The JF-17 can carry 3.6 tons of weapons and use radar guided and heat seeking missiles. It has max speed of nearly 2,000 kilometers an hour, an operating range of 1,300 kilometers and a max altitude of 55,000 feet. China has not yet decided on whether it will use the FC-1/JF-17 itself. This is apparently because China believes its own J-10 (another local design) and J-11 (a license built Russian Su-27) are adequate for their needs. The J-10, like the JF-17, did not work out as well as was hoped.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: china; f22; jxx; militaryaviation; raptor22; savetheraptor
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Make sure 0bama does not give the Chicoms a Raptor. It would turn a $65 billion air superiority investment into zilch overnight.


1 posted on 11/17/2009 7:28:46 AM PST by myknowledge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: myknowledge
UPDATE 1-China, US eye pact to help troubled banks -sources
2 posted on 11/17/2009 7:29:08 AM PST by bsf2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bsf2009

zer0 will probably give them some of ours, and send engineers over there to help them start a production line.


3 posted on 11/17/2009 7:31:51 AM PST by The Sons of Liberty (Pork Eating Crusader - FUBO! Mene, Mene, Tekel, Upharsin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: myknowledge

The most important difference between the Chinese and American versions is that the Chinese will build lots of theirs.


4 posted on 11/17/2009 7:35:49 AM PST by Uncle Miltie (America, 1776 - 2009. R.I.P.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Sons of Liberty

I think Clinton already gave them the plans in exchange for campaign money.


5 posted on 11/17/2009 7:35:54 AM PST by taillightchaser (When a democrat says "The American people" you know the next words out of his mouth will be lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: bsf2009
But given the quantity and quality of data Chinese hackers have been stealing in the past five years, it's possible that they have much of the American technology that makes the F-22 and F-35 possible.

Hackers (what kind of sorry security on the part of engineers and builders here in the US?), or giveaway technology by the liberals who want the utter destruction of our own nation (paging Mr. 0bama).

6 posted on 11/17/2009 7:35:58 AM PST by TheBattman (Pray for our country...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: The Sons of Liberty

“zer0 will probably give them some of ours, and send engineers over there to help them start a production line.”

Hey, he’s just spreading the “wealth” ... technological wealth. Actually, Obambi giving them the technology was the first thing I thought when I saw that article, too. Clinton and Carter have both given away our technology secrets as well, so there is a prescedent for Democrat presidents doing it.


7 posted on 11/17/2009 7:36:20 AM PST by Jackson57
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: The Sons of Liberty

My first thought exactly, and they’ll get Bill Clinton to hand deliver the plans in exchange for a couple of dozen morbidly obese peasant’s daughters.


8 posted on 11/17/2009 7:37:02 AM PST by redstateconfidential (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Miltie

Lots? The high level of engineering inherent in a 5th generation fighter would regulate the produceability stats.


9 posted on 11/17/2009 7:37:36 AM PST by myknowledge (F-22 Raptor: World's Largest Distributor of Sukhoi parts!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: myknowledge
"The J-10 looks something like the American F-16, and weighs about the same (19 tons"

"The JF-17 design is based on a cancelled Russian project, the MiG-33"


10 posted on 11/17/2009 7:42:51 AM PST by DemforBush (Now officially 100% ex-Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheBattman
Hackers...

There were several articles a while back that reported on an infiltration of several gubmint computer systems by "a foreign entity", including the DoD, in 2007. As I recall it was reported that hundreds of terabytes were downloaded by the hackers. As a reference for the amount of info that was stolen, the Library of Congress, with all it's millions of volumes, is about 12 terabytes in total.

So, they (the foreign entity) probably has plans for every major weapons system in our inventory, along with employee records and the type and amount of soap they stock in the executive bathrooms at the Pentagon.....

11 posted on 11/17/2009 7:43:55 AM PST by Thermalseeker (Stop the insanity - Flush Congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: myknowledge

Obama and his marxists running the govt are a far bigger threat than the Chinese.


12 posted on 11/17/2009 7:44:50 AM PST by Frantzie (Judge David Carter - democrat & dishonorable Marine like John Murtha.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: myknowledge

Why is the KNOWN theft of our military technology not cause for an immediate, hugely destructive war?


13 posted on 11/17/2009 7:44:58 AM PST by TheZMan (Just secede and get it over with. No love lost on either side. Cya.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheBattman

I don’t think its hackers and I don’t think it was Clinton.

Thousands of engineers of Chinese origin work here, some
have security clearances and access to sensitive information. With family members in China they might have some ‘pressure’ to ‘contribute’ to the Motherland. Also
plain old fashioned greed probably figures in the equation.

We are making China richer every time we buy something,
so maybe every one of us is a ‘Clinton’.


14 posted on 11/17/2009 7:51:29 AM PST by rahbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DemforBush
The J-10 looks like a cross between the Eurofighter Typhoon and the F-16.

The JF-17 looks like a boxy F-20 Tigershark.

There, fixed the errors.

15 posted on 11/17/2009 8:00:10 AM PST by myknowledge (F-22 Raptor: World's Largest Distributor of Sukhoi parts!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: myknowledge

RP/UCAVs are actually the next wave of ‘cool stuff’, even for ACM/ air superiority roles.

Google around for the Navy’s semi-autonomous new platform.


16 posted on 11/17/2009 8:03:07 AM PST by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Sons of Liberty

Look how unfair it is. An obviously inferior Great Satan shouldn’t have a superior military. The big 0 needs to even things out and put us in our place by sharing the technology and resources we stole from the world.


17 posted on 11/17/2009 8:07:20 AM PST by kenth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DemforBush

The J-10 is based on the Israeli Lavi, which, in turn, was based on the F-16.


18 posted on 11/17/2009 8:11:08 AM PST by Little Ray (The beatings will continue until GOP comes to heel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: bsf2009

“data Chinese hackers have been stealing”

0 dumped a load of data on the Chinese within 5-6 weeks as I recall.

reported as a “snafu”.


19 posted on 11/17/2009 8:53:27 AM PST by chuck_the_tv_out ( <<< click my name: now featuring Freeper classifieds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bsf2009

To be perfectly frank, I don’t think we will ever know. The thing with the Chinese is that they are not going to let anything leak out. I jsut wish we wouldn’t percieve them as we tend to, as these humble, ignorant savages who don’t know how to build a house, much less weaponry. Chances are they may very well have an entire fleet set up and pilots who know every possible maneuver. We will never know because they aren’t flaunting their progress and I would think that their mlitary training techniques are kept under strict guard.


20 posted on 11/17/2009 9:04:26 AM PST by Niuhuru (The Internet is the digital AIDS; adapting and successfully destroying the MSM host.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson