Posted on 12/17/2009 5:00:34 PM PST by KevinDavis
Hello? Not sure what’s going on here... :-)
>> Climate change is the process of Global Warming and Global Cooling.
Climate change is a non-constant climate condition.
On the other hand, Climate Change is the new umbrella term for all things associated with the AGW agenda, including redistribution of wealth.
Climate Change and climate change are not the same thing - yet, through abuse of meaning, it’s portrayed by the Left to be inescapably the same thing. In other words, one must accept “Climate Change” because the phonetic and character sequence are both identical to “climate change”.
This is another example of semantic combat used by the Left to disrupt logical debate.
This is another example of semantic combat used by the Left to disrupt logical debate.
In whatever semantic combat anyone wants to use, all that FReepers have to know is that the "normal processes" are -- Climate Change, which consists of Global Warming and Global Cooling. These are processes that go on regardless of what we do. And everyone can see them and has seen them in operation.
The part that is not valid is only this part -- "Anthropogenic Global Warming"... and that's it.
So, I advise FReepers to not get all "hyped up" about "Global Warming" and Global Cooling" (and the name for both of them "Climate Change") because these are nothing more than natural earth processes.
The only thing to be concerned about, and thus fight against as not valid -- is -- "Anthropogenic Global Warming"... and that's it... :-)
By George, I think you've got it! No matter what happens, it is "consistent with our models." Just don't ask us for the "data" our models are based on!
I’m not sure why you’re assigning a proper noun to global cooling, and also defining Climate Change as process of two other titles.
The public momentum that supports the AGW agenda is not driven by facts, but by sloganeering and imagery. If people are going to get hooked on two dimensional terminology, it’s worth considering the value of deconstructing it.
I’m not sure why you’re assigning a proper noun to global cooling, and also defining Climate Change as process of two other titles.
Well, because "Global Warming" and "Global Cooling" and "Climate Change" are proper names/nouns for a process that we've had going on naturally on this earth for millennia.
In other words, it's their "proper names/nouns"... :-)
"Anthropogenic Global Warming" is also capitalized as it's a proper name for a process, too -- although this is a process that is a false and fake process and doesn't really happen.
The capital letters have nothing to do with the process... LOL...
If people are going to get hooked on two dimensional terminology, it’s worth considering the value of deconstructing it.
I "deconstruct it" by making sure that everyone knows that Global Warming and Global Cooling and Climate Change are all natural processes that have gone on for millennia and those processes happen without any help from mankind.
I also "deconstruct it" by making sure that everyone knows that what some of these scientists are talking about (and some of those politicians, too) -- is "Anthropogenic Global Warming" and this is what has absoluetely no scientific support.
Can we agree the horse is dead?
He’s just involuntarily twitching right now... :-)
It is. It's just the Atmosphere which is getting colder.
Heat flows from hotter to colder(spontaneously). Carbon dioxide is in the atmosphere.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.