Skip to comments.
Senator Max Baucus denies being DRUNK during Senate speech
Syracuse.com ^
| 12.29.09
| Trish LaMonte
Posted on 12/29/2009 7:53:00 AM PST by rface
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-94 next last
To: rface
If he wasn’t drunk which it CLEARLY looked like he was, then a stroke comes to mind...nah, he was too smelly according to the guy next to him.
61
posted on
12/29/2009 8:28:23 AM PST
by
TribalPrincess2U
(demonicRATS... taxes, pain and slow death. Is this what you want?)
To: Texican72
Baucus Drunk is the first thing showing when you type in Baucus on bing.com. I just posted this info as its own thread here:
Google Spikes Drunk Baucus Story
Post that info there if you got a second. :)
Do you have a screenshot? I would do it, but my Firefox busted and I would need to restart my PC to get it going... for some reason, my new IE will not copy large screenshots to the clipboard (CTRL PRTSCRN, ALT PRTSCRN don't work!)
62
posted on
12/29/2009 8:30:18 AM PST
by
Bon mots
To: hoe_cake
Naturally stupid...
To: rface
He had a stroke then? That slurring was pretty pronounced as was his inability to sound coherent.
64
posted on
12/29/2009 8:35:01 AM PST
by
OpusatFR
(Tagline not State Approved. Thoughts not State Approved. Actions not State Approved)
To: CholeraJoe
Yep.
And the cool thing about the vehement denial is this:
Montana folk will be saying: “I’ll be the judge of that.”
They’ll visit the site and come away blushing.
Mr. Bacchus, you blew it. Coulda kept your mouth shut, kept the gerbil scat in, but no-o-o-o.
65
posted on
12/29/2009 8:39:06 AM PST
by
StAntKnee
(I keep thinking I'm gonna wake up from this dream theatre of the absurd.)
To: hoe_cake
Prediction: By the end of the week it will be another press release. He was very tired and a legal prescription drug impaired his speech.
66
posted on
12/29/2009 8:41:03 AM PST
by
StAntKnee
(I keep thinking I'm gonna wake up from this dream theatre of the absurd.)
To: hoe_cake
67
posted on
12/29/2009 8:42:04 AM PST
by
HerrBlucher
(Jail Al Gore and the Climate Frauds!)
To: hoe_cake
The only thing missing was the lampshade on his head.
68
posted on
12/29/2009 8:44:03 AM PST
by
HerrBlucher
(Jail Al Gore and the Climate Frauds!)
To: rface
Drunks often take denial of their problem to outrageous extremes when caught red handed.
To: HerrBlucher
LOL! or the pantyhose on his head.
70
posted on
12/29/2009 8:47:12 AM PST
by
hoe_cake
(A member of the Society of the Descendants of the Signers of the Constitution.)
To: stormer
That’s what I was thinking - Foley doesn’t have a lot of room to throw stones.
To: StAntKnee
The spin will be that he’s diabetic and his blood sugar was low.
I think that will be my excuse come this New Year’s Eve.
72
posted on
12/29/2009 8:48:35 AM PST
by
hoe_cake
(A member of the Society of the Descendants of the Signers of the Constitution.)
To: hoe_cake
73
posted on
12/29/2009 8:49:47 AM PST
by
maddog55
(Hold out baits to entice the enemy. Feign disorder, and crush him.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Exactly, they do it to people on the right all the time. They don’t like it when the shoe is on the other foot though.
74
posted on
12/29/2009 8:51:14 AM PST
by
mrsmel
To: rface
Hmmm? Maybe it’s time that the congressional members submit to random drug tests?????
75
posted on
12/29/2009 8:53:01 AM PST
by
eeriegeno
(<p>)
To: rface
He actually wants us to believe him. The dems lie about everything; so why should we?
76
posted on
12/29/2009 8:54:47 AM PST
by
freekitty
(Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
To: Blennos
Yeah, I
think I heard somewhere that he had a pill problem. Or maybe it was a gender issue, can't remember for sure but what the he11, the dems and the MSM make a living out of drive-by chit like this.
He can deal with it.
77
posted on
12/29/2009 8:55:50 AM PST
by
skimbell
To: rface
“breathalyser for members of congress.”
They might add drug tests for them too.
78
posted on
12/29/2009 8:56:15 AM PST
by
freekitty
(Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
To: OrioleFan
79
posted on
12/29/2009 8:58:23 AM PST
by
hoe_cake
(A member of the Society of the Descendants of the Signers of the Constitution.)
To: xjcsa
Looks like it took about five days for him and his staff to decide how to handle it. Outraged denial was definitely one way to go, but its easier to take seriously when it doesnt take a week to get there. Yup. He'd also be more credible if he faced the press and addressed the allegations himself. That he released a statement through his press flack speaks volumes to me.
Plastered.
80
posted on
12/29/2009 9:00:40 AM PST
by
freespirited
(People talk about "too big to fail." Our government is too big to succeed. --Chris Chocola)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-94 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson