Posted on 02/09/2010 11:34:53 AM PST by neverdem
Over at The Faculty Lounge, there are some pictures of sit-ins from the early 1960s. Regarding a 1963 sit-in in Jackson, Mississippi, TFL writes: By one account, members of the all-White Jackson police force stood guard outside, while several FBI agents (the guys in back wearing shades) observed from inside. That White guy at the counter, thats Tougaloo professor and community activist Hunter Gray (John R. Salter) who helped organize the Jackson sit-ins. And thats blood on his shirt. All of the protesters had been covered in slop, and some were beaten with brass knuckles and broken bottles.
The non-violent Civil Rights protesters allowed themselves to be beaten in public while the media watched; the images helped win sympathy for the Civil Rights Movement in the North, and proved to be crucial in developing the political will for the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
In a limited sense, the medias presence provided some protection for the protesters; there was never a case in which a civil rights protester was murdered in front of media cameras. At night, when everyone had gone home, things were very different. As Salter later explained:
I was beaten and arrested many times and hospitalized twice. This happened to many, many people in the movement. No one knows what kind of massive racist retaliation would have been directed against grassroots black people had the black community not had a healthy measure of firearms within it.
When the campus of Tougaloo College was fired on by KKK-type racial night-riders, my home was shot up and a bullet missed my infant daughter by inches. We received no help from the Justice Department and we guarded our campus faculty and students together on that and subsequent occasions. We let this be known. The racist attacks slackened considerably. Night-riders are cowardly people in any time and place and they take advantage of fear and weakness.
Later, I worked for years in the Deep South as a full-time civil rights organizer. Like a martyred friend of mine, NAACP staffer Medgar W. Evers, I, too, was on many Klan death lists and I, too, traveled armed: a .38 special Smith and Wesson revolver and a 44/40 Winchester carbine.
The knowledge that I had these weapons and was willing to use them kept enemies at bay. Years later, in a changed Mississippi, this was confirmed by a former prominent leader of the White Knights of the KKK when we had an interesting dinner together at Jackson.
In the 1970s, I was Southside director of the large, privately-funded Chicago Commons Association. Our primary focus involved assisting minority people in developing sensible community organizations vis-a-vis schools, city services, anti-crime.
We were opposed by white racist organizations (e.g., Nazi Party) and various youth gangs of many sorts. My staff and I received countless death threats, there were arson attacks on our offices, and, on one occasion, men with weapons came to my home and told my wife and children that they intended to kill me. (I happened to be at work.)
Again, I was glad I had many firearms and, again, we guarded our home and let this be known. We responded to hate calls on the telephone by telling the callers we were quite prepared for them.
For Salter, the right to own a handgun was apparently a crucial part of his ability to exercise his right to defend himself and his family, which was a sine qua non of his ability to stay alive in order to exercise his First Amendment rights to advocate for enforcement of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Yet in modern Chicago, decent law-abiding citizens are forbidden to own handguns. As I detailed in my amicus brief in McDonald v. Chicago (pages 3945), many people find that a handgun is best choice for family defense, especially in urban areas such as Chicago. As the history of the Civil Rights Movement demonstrates, the denial of the constitutional right to own a handgun could endanger other constitutional rights, particularly the rights of community organizers.
In the antebellum South, and for many years afterward, it was illegal for Blacks to own firearms.
Gun control in the U.S. was originally directed solely and entirely towards black people.
The Romans had weapon control. Citizens couldn’t own them.
The Anglo-Saxons were a nation in arms.
Who were freer????
The Way of the Whigs? Lincolns first political party dissolved, and so could todays Republicans
New federal climate change agency forming
The Great IPCC Meltdown Continues
Some noteworthy articles about politics, foreign or military affairs, IMHO, FReepmail me if you want on or off my list.
And gang-land drive-by shootings are the modern day equivalent of “night riders”.
It is a pity that blacks were denied the revolution they earned. Instead, black leaders were bought off and democrat government policy has been to destroy their families ever since.
bookmarked
Thanks for the ping!
Amen! Looks like an M1 Garand, and up page is a nice M1 Carbine with 30 round mag. Sweet shooters
Close -
Mosin Nagant, M-1 Carbine and FN-49.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.