Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

More Lawsuits On The Way re: ObamaCare
Flopping Aces ^ | 03-25-10 | Curt

Posted on 03/25/2010 1:57:55 PM PDT by Starman417

Ed Morrissey posts about the Wisconsin Attorney General asking for authorization to sue over ObamaCare today. The interesting part is the AG's take on the legal process and why he thinks suits will be successful:

Based on my preliminary review of the Act, I have concluded that a sufficient legal basis exists to contest the individual mandate to carry health insurance or pay a penalty under the Act. It is not clear that Congress has an enumerated power under Article 1 of the U.S. Constitution to impose this requirement on a citizen. Further, the tax imposed on a citizen for failure to carry such insurance may not comport with the requirement that any direct tax be apportioned among the states in accordance with Article 1, Sections 2 and 9 of the U.S. Constitution.

In addition, I am very concerned that the Act upsets the proper balance of power between the federal government and the states that was envisioned by the Founders.

[snip]

In addition there are the group of 13 Attorney Generals who have filed suit in Florida (PDF here)

Then we have Georgia where the AG there refused to file suit....but hold your horses:

Read more at floppingaces.net...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: bho44; bhohealthcare; healthcare; lawsuit; obama; obamacare; obmam; socialisthealthcare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 03/25/2010 1:57:55 PM PDT by Starman417
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Starman417

Interesting. The second cause, tax not apportioned, is something that I had not thought of. Hope any all off of these suits work.


2 posted on 03/25/2010 2:00:11 PM PDT by K-oneTexas (I'm not a judge and there ain't enough of me to be a jury. (Zell Miller, A National Party No More))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starman417

I wonder if the WI AG attacking more parts of the bill could get the whole thing tossed.


3 posted on 03/25/2010 2:00:40 PM PDT by Frantzie (McCain = Obama's friend McCain called AMERICANS against amnesty - "racists")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starman417

If the Supreme Court allows this mandate to stand then Congress can mandate to citizens anything and everything for the “common good!”

Not exactly what the Founding Fathers had in mind.


4 posted on 03/25/2010 2:01:41 PM PDT by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starman417

The AZ AG is hiding under the rug. Cowardly lib.


5 posted on 03/25/2010 2:07:10 PM PDT by lulu16
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starman417
Attorney General Thurbert Baker on Wednesday declined the Republican's governor request to sue over the health care law, arguing the state doesn't have a ``a viable legal claim.''

``I cannot in good conscience file a lawsuit against the United States that I believe has little or no chance of success and will undoubtedly consume significant state resources in a time of severe budgetary crisis,'' Baker wrote in a letter to the governor. Baker is seeking the Democratic nomination to succeed Perdue.

Doesn't have a viable legal claim?

Another apparatchik.

Hey, all you good people from Georgia, defeat this bozo Baker in November!

6 posted on 03/25/2010 2:08:17 PM PDT by THX 1138 ("Harry, I have a gift.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lulu16

My question is why he thinks he needs approval to follow wishes of Wisconsin citizens.

In Wash. State, AG just did it to the chagrin of farout Dem governor and huge D majority legislature.


7 posted on 03/25/2010 2:09:40 PM PDT by swatter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: THX 1138

We will defeat Baker soundly.


8 posted on 03/25/2010 2:20:23 PM PDT by Principled (Get the capital back! NRST!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Starman417
Hey Obama!....better strap your ass down!
9 posted on 03/25/2010 2:23:02 PM PDT by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starman417

I have wondered why no enterprising soul has suggested a class action suit by individuals against Big Brother about Zerocare.

I think that there would be millions of people joining the suit.


10 posted on 03/25/2010 2:23:41 PM PDT by El Gran Salseron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: THX 1138

“Doesn’t have a viable legal claim?”

Try this Thurbert (snicker):

The Constitution proscribes specific ENUMERATED POWERS to the federal government. In other words, legal midget, if it ain’t listed, it is ILLEGAl for the federal government to do it.

That clear. That simple.


11 posted on 03/25/2010 2:24:49 PM PDT by EyeGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: El Gran Salseron

I believe that several individuals in Michigan have done that.


12 posted on 03/25/2010 2:27:44 PM PDT by NewHampshireDuo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: K-oneTexas

And how can they legally tax some and exempt others for political reasons?


13 posted on 03/25/2010 2:29:01 PM PDT by FreedBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FreedBird

I agree, but what clause of the Constitution or bill of rights is that in?

I think with this (apportionment of direct taxes) and the Commerce clause, the 10th Amendment (unfunded mandates and states rights) and the 13th Amendment (involuntary servitude).

Go States AG’s, GO!!!!!! ACLU too!!!!


14 posted on 03/25/2010 2:33:29 PM PDT by K-oneTexas (I'm not a judge and there ain't enough of me to be a jury. (Zell Miller, A National Party No More))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: K-oneTexas

Not ACLU but rather ACLJ!!!


15 posted on 03/25/2010 2:33:52 PM PDT by K-oneTexas (I'm not a judge and there ain't enough of me to be a jury. (Zell Miller, A National Party No More))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: K-oneTexas

Why should half the country have to pay for the other half who wants to be dependent on the government? It seems as if half the country wants to be independent and the other half wants to be dependent. The country is divided in half.


16 posted on 03/25/2010 2:39:01 PM PDT by FreedBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Starman417

“In addition, I am very concerned that the Act upsets the proper balance of power between the federal government and the states that was envisioned by the Founders.”

Wow. When an official from a state like Wisconsin starts talking about states’ rights you know things are getting serious.


17 posted on 03/25/2010 2:46:20 PM PDT by SharpRightTurn (White, black, and red all over--America's affirmative action, metrosexual president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starman417
The bill also discriminates against light skinned people, with a 10% tax on tanning services...how racist can you get? How about a 10% tax on fried chicken to balance it out? Which is more harmful for your health?
18 posted on 03/25/2010 3:11:21 PM PDT by rolling_stone (no more bailouts, the taxpayers are out of money!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: K-oneTexas
The second cause, tax not apportioned, is something that I had not thought of.

You can be sure the Demons have thought of it all, and it won't matter, in the end, the Supreme Court will provide the cover for Obama. We did not have an election in 08, we had a Coup d'état.

19 posted on 03/25/2010 4:33:43 PM PDT by itsahoot (Each generation takes to excess, what the previous generation accepted in moderation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: El Gran Salseron
I think that there would be millions of people joining the suit.

No standing, don'tcha know.

20 posted on 03/25/2010 4:39:56 PM PDT by itsahoot (Each generation takes to excess, what the previous generation accepted in moderation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson