Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wastedpotential
No Pat is saying that Palin is choosing her endorsements wisely while never sacrificing her principles. when it is required to risk to get her message across she risks it. Like Haley and houffman. when she can get her message across without much risk she does that also like in IW. Palin is not going to back a loser just to be “pure” She has not backed any candidate that does not at least campaign on her core issues. Pro-life, pro-gun, pro-military, small limited government.

Pat is saying that Palin unlike any other politician lately is fusing her message and her ambition so that both can be advance at the same time without any damage to either.

From listening to Palin she feels the message is the most important thing. However if she can advance that and advance herself she does so. when she can not she chooses to advance the message instead.

15 posted on 06/11/2010 12:44:38 AM PDT by unseen1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: unseen1

From listening to Palin she feels the message is the most important thing. However if she can advance that and advance herself she does so. when she can not she chooses to advance the message instead.

____________________

Like Reagan. Again.


18 posted on 06/11/2010 12:48:26 AM PDT by Psalm 144 (Let me be clear. The voluntary pancipation of Cinco de Quatro is mandated in all 57 states.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: unseen1

Hayworth had a legit shot to beat McCain - especially if the politicians with national followings lined up behind him.


19 posted on 06/11/2010 12:58:44 AM PDT by wastedpotential (McCain always said I was an agent of intolerance - but in 2008 those like me tolerated him most)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson