Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats, Advocacy Groups Blast Cuts to Food Stamps to Fund $26B Aid Bill
Fox News ^ | 8/10/10

Posted on 08/11/2010 4:14:09 AM PDT by EBH

But the bill also requires that $12 billion be stripped from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, commonly known as food stamps, to help fund the new bill, prompting some Democrats to cringe at the notion of cutting back on one necessity to pay for another.

Arguably one of the most outspoken opponents on the Democratic side is Connecticut Rep. Rosa DeLauro, who has blasted the move as “a bitter pill to swallow” but still voted yes.

“I fought very hard for the food assistance money in the Recovery Act, and the fact is that participation in the food stamps program has jumped dramatically with the economic crisis, from 31.1 million persons to 38.2 million just in one year,” DeLauro said in an e-mail sent to FoxNews.com. “But I know that states across the nation and my own state of Connecticut also desperately need these resources to save jobs and avoid Draconian cuts to essential services...

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS: bailout; democrats; economy; elections; foodstamps; screwthedisabled; screwthepoorandneedy; screwtheseniors; teachers; teacherscantgetitup; teachersfcantgetitup; unions; viagara; viagaraforteachers; zer0cojones
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last
What is more draconian than cutting food stamps? Granted there are a lot of folks on stamps that maybe really don't need them...but the first of true draconian cuts begins.

I some how don't consider union teachers essential services like I do food stamps.

1 posted on 08/11/2010 4:14:11 AM PDT by EBH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: EBH

No doubt mamy on food stamps or other government subsidies voted for Obama. The only way to shake them from their stupor is to make cuts like this — to impact their lives. Up until now, the mantra was the rich are evil, and we will make them pay to help you, the downtrodden. It will take a severe circumstance, like cuts in food stamps, to convince the true believers they have been worshipping a false idol.


2 posted on 08/11/2010 4:20:04 AM PDT by fatnotlazy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EBH

This is deliberately applying pressure to a group that is primarily made up of Obama voters that have started to go soft.


3 posted on 08/11/2010 4:21:41 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fatnotlazy

Exactly what I was thinking.

This is a shot across the bow.


4 posted on 08/11/2010 4:22:44 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: EBH

So they’re STEALING FOOD FROM THE MOUTHS OF BABIES to pay off the big union bosses to work for their re-election in November.

(spoken like the Dems would, if the shoe was on the other foot...or something like that)


5 posted on 08/11/2010 4:24:51 AM PDT by BobL (The whole point of being human is knowing when the party's over.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EBH
"... prompting some Democrats to cringe at the notion of cutting back on one necessity to pay for another."

Democrats cringe when faced with the reality the rest of us face on a daily basis.

6 posted on 08/11/2010 4:26:26 AM PDT by airborne (Why is it we won't allow the Bible in school, but we will in prison? Think about it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EBH

When you see all you enemies standing in the same puddle of gasoline, throw in a match and get out of the way.

We conservatives should just let the liberals destroy each other over where to spend the diminishing resources of government, goading both sides, and letting the public see the folly of both of them.

Perhaps we could revive the idea of the GOP commercial used in the 1980 election, which showed Tip O’Neill and the Democrats running out of gas.


7 posted on 08/11/2010 4:30:41 AM PDT by Daveinyork
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EBH

Yeah, right—a food stampe cut. [/s] As if they won’t put this $$ back later and demogague anyone who opposes it as trying to “starve kids”. More and more I think that the way to get people out of “stupid” gear is to eliminate the safety net all together. Think of how more motivated and careful people would be if there were nothing between them and the consequences of their behavior.


8 posted on 08/11/2010 4:34:15 AM PDT by rbg81 (When you see Obama, shout: "DO YOUR JOB!!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: airborne

The idiots voted for these people to ‘clean up the mess’ made by Bush. This is like hiring Dennis the Menace as you maid. What a mess!


9 posted on 08/11/2010 4:36:06 AM PDT by screaminsunshine (m)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: screaminsunshine

Bush’s mess was having a Democrat Congress and not vetoing anything they sent him!


10 posted on 08/11/2010 4:39:16 AM PDT by airborne (Why is it we won't allow the Bible in school, but we will in prison? Think about it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: EBH

>>>>>Arguably one of the most outspoken opponents on the Democratic side is Connecticut Rep. Rosa DeLauro, who has blasted the move as “a bitter pill to swallow” but still voted yes. <<<<<<

Ha ha these people don’t believe in what thy vote for , yet they will not dissappoint The Messiah, and vote their conscience.

Anyone who voted for people like this need their heads examined, this woman doesnt even have the courage to vote her convictions. She doesnt deserve to be in Congress. There are a hundred just like her. Mere tools.


11 posted on 08/11/2010 4:41:07 AM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

There goes the whole facade about liberal compassion and chaity. When necessary to take care of the union interests, the poor get chucked right under the bus. Liberal hypocrisy is breathtaking.


12 posted on 08/11/2010 4:42:56 AM PDT by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Daveinyork
When you see all you enemies standing in the same puddle of gasoline, throw in a match and get out of the way.

Its a big ole honkin hanging softball dead across the center of the plate. In fact I'd even throw out a couple more questions like "Wouldn't it have been easier to take that money out of the EPA budget or something?"
13 posted on 08/11/2010 4:43:49 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: EBH
What is more draconian than cutting food stamps?

Disturbing teachers on summer vacation with reality...

14 posted on 08/11/2010 4:45:36 AM PDT by an amused spectator (Watching the MSM with Obama is like watching Joslyn James with Tiger Woods)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fatnotlazy
No doubt mamy on food stamps or other government subsidies voted for Obama. The only way to shake them from their stupor is to make cuts like this — to impact their lives.

THANK GOD a cut in food stamps is NOT a tax increase for those making under $250,000 a year... :-)

15 posted on 08/11/2010 4:47:06 AM PDT by an amused spectator (Watching the MSM with Obama is like watching Joslyn James with Tiger Woods)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: EBH

Pfft...like the cuts would ever actually happen. They will past a $20B bailout of the food stamp program next week.

For the children.


16 posted on 08/11/2010 4:47:22 AM PDT by PogySailor (BHO - Dividing the country into tribes since 2008.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: an amused spectator

Amen.

It’s clear whom the Dims are owned by.


17 posted on 08/11/2010 4:48:44 AM PDT by mike-zed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: fatnotlazy

Indeed this could backfire on them big time. There are lots of people who have recently turned to food stamps though as a last resort. The cheats will always find a way around things. But, as people begin to have to find alternative sources of food in these worsening economic times...they just may find themselves on the steps of a church.

From a political standpoint conservatives always have talked about self-sufficiency and yet, still be charitable. Is there a “missionary style” calling to not only provide minimal food assistance, with an opportunity teach our country’s true Constitutional values? It this the opportunity to demonstrate that the elitists can’t help them?

Should we turn this into a political hot potato? Not so much as a finger pointing blame game, but how by returning to our Founding Father’s wisdom we can save ourselves.

Keep in mind that controlling access to food was the first things Stalin, Lenin, Mao, even Castro did in order to gain tyranny over the people. They held no moral compunction against letting people starve.

I find it interesting that in the past few days several threads have been posted revolving around food control by the government.


18 posted on 08/11/2010 4:50:10 AM PDT by EBH (Our First Right...."it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: EBH
It's a ruse, people. There are no cuts - none. Zero. What they did was agree to cut the projected expenditures on food assistance four to eight years from now. Congress hasn't even passed this year's budget yet.

Is it any wonder they think we're sheep?

Here's how they did it:

"When the stimulus passed, it included a big hike in funding for the food stamp program. But the extra funding was calculated based on a projected inflation rate for food prices that turned out to be far too high, meaning the extra funding would extend until 2018 or 2019. The offsets in the new bill trim those added benefits back so that they'll only last until 2015, which is still two years longer than originally anticipated. So the food stamp cuts aren’t exactly cuts; instead, Congress is scaling back temporary bonus funding that turned out to have had more money set aside than was actually necessary to achieve its intended goals."

Source: reason.com

19 posted on 08/11/2010 4:53:04 AM PDT by andy58-in-nh (America does not need to be organized: it needs to be liberated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EBH
The Dems don't even pay lip service to pay-as-you-go any more, apparently.

Anybody remember what paygo is? I think it's a law or something...

20 posted on 08/11/2010 4:55:38 AM PDT by ZOOKER ( Exploring the fine line between cynicism and outright depression)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson