Replies

The WTC Victory Mosque is New York’s version of the Al Aqsa Mosque on the ruins of the Temple Mount.

So, does this mean the Catholic Church can build a Cathedral in Mecca, Kate?

BTW, FUKP.

There is the time-honored Muslim response.

Paging Timothy McVeigh...

I’d prefer it become a lesson in pig farming.

My thanks to paulycy for encouraging me to post yet another of my epistles to FR on a public thread:

Countering Islamophobia claims: (Vanity)
What Eagle Lurks in the Heart of Me | 16 August 2010 | Combat_Boots

Posted on Monday, August 16, 2010 4:21:57 PM by combat_boots

I have studied Islam for decades and almost became a Muslim. I have read the original texts, jurisprudence, historians, and scholars.

Read. Orientalists like Bernard Lewis. Modernists like Samuel Huntington. Natives like Fareed Zakaria or other, recent books. Check sites like Islaminaction’s, Pam Geller’s, Richard Poe, Steve Emerson’s, or “TelltheChildrenthe Truth.” Learn Taqiyya. Find the 5 tenets and their counterparts in Western culture. Refute. Rebutt. Return arguments. And, decide whether you will give all, because, in reality, you may well have to.

Specific questions to fire back with, given here as a starting point for your own 10-point plan:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2571689/posts

Yeah, let’s tolerate Muslims all the way to our grave. That’s the ticket.

O’Reilly is hammering this mosque fiasco right now. I can’t believe the commie ‘RATS are trying to push their “freedom of religion” routine. When in the hell have the commie libs ever cared about “freedom of religion”? If some Christian group tried to build a shrine at Ground Zero, the libs would be “outraged” and hysterical right now!

The Muslims who want to build this mosque didn't fly airplanes into skyscrapers. They don't support terrorism.

I disagree with the second premise. The imam of this mosque has been on the record blaming the US for 9/11 and refuses to condemn hamas and hizzbolah as terrorists organizations. These folks also supported the flotilla against Israel with their money so they are heaving in bed with Islamic terror and should not be allowed to build their "victory mosque" anywhere near Ground Zero.

Like Noonan, Parker needs to retire.

Bill Whittle Ground Zero Mosque Reality Check
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qg_iDPRud_c

It is better to be feared than respected. Words to live (longer) by....

The real problem is not Americans tolerating muslims...........it is the fact that muslims tolerate no one but muslims and they don’t even like all of them!

By what understanding do we assign guilt to all for the actions of a relative few?

Kathleen, it was only a few Nazis, a few communists,
a few KKKers, a few Jap nationalists who were guilty
of the most horrendous crimes, yet all paid the price
and with good reason, they did not turn on the fanatics
in their midst. So it is with Islam, I have yet to see
an Islamic country catch and hang a radical much less
refute or refudiate if you will, the radical agenda.
Keep in mind that Americans as a people are being
punished by the radicals for the actions of a few.

It’s time we took the gloves off, said,
“This is the game you are playing,forcing us to
play it too!. How do you like us NOW!”

Most people do not recognize that what happens in a mosque is sedition. Pure and simple. Islam is not just a “religion”, it is a cult, it is it’s own government, its judicial...is in its sharia, and its military (jihadis) all rolled into one with one intent ...and that is to rule wherever they take root. It is a invasive, systemic infection looking to take over the host once it has quantum.

This is not just a “religion”, but something that cloaks itself in those terms so it should not be given the same treatment contemplated under the first amendment. The Korans rules in Sharia are to consume whatever government there is wherever it goes. To supplant and replace.

The sooner America learns this , the better.

Obama? Obama and Company? Should be tried for treason in this issue for promoting the establishment of a foreign government on our soils. As a Muslim, he knows this, he knows sharia, but is looking to deceive America.

For all interested...Wanna learn more?

http://thehayride.com/2010/08/louisiana-at-leading-edge-in-fight-against-shariah/#more-5392

and this

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ib9rofXQl6w&feature=player_embedded

Lets keep America, America!

Obama? Obama and Company? Should be tried for treason in this issue for promoting the establishment of a foreign government on our soils. As a Muslim, he knows this, he knows sharia, but is looking to deceive America.

It's this type of nonsensical, backwards, touchy feely, moronic thinking that has this country on the ropes.

Allowing issues to be framed in this context is the primary mistake from those who “go along” with this tolerance drivel. There are times when right is right and wrong is wrong and elitists who demand tolerance should be ignored for the crackpots they truly are.

“The mosque should be built precisely because we don’t like the idea very much.”

This statement is truly insane. This type of thinking is emblematic of a waning, dying culture. Western civilization does not have to die but Leftists such as Parker have a death wish.

Tolerance of evil is a game for scummy politicians. Besides, the leftist weasels aren’t selling tolerance. They are selling appeasement, thinking they can sweet talk the Muslims out of wanting to kill us, showing them what tolerant idiots we are. The terrorists are laughing at us in anticipation of having a monument built to them at ground zero. It is holy ground for them, and the day will come when infidels won’t be allowed to tread there.

Hint to the scummy idiots: The Islamic world respects strength, and they attack weakness.

Is this the Parker who attacked Gov. Palin for Romney?

"(The GroundZero Mosque) cleared its final hurdle ….
developers plan to build the $100 million center which will include a mosque.
Since its incipient stages in July 2009, when a Muslim-run real-estate development
company purchased the damaged, vacant building and land where the new center
will be built, the project has sparked controversy and debate.
.... the tattered building that was bought by the Muslim real estate company had
been owned by a subsidiary of Bain Capital, a company Romney founded in 1984.
So it’s OK if his company can profit off the sale of the land ."

Late in October, The American Spectator's The Prowler revealed:
"Former Mitt Romney presidential campaign staffers…
have been involved in spreading anti-Palin spin to reporters, seeking to diminish her standing after the election.
'Sarah Palin is a lightweight, she won't be the first, not even the third, person people will think of when it comes to 2012,'
says one former Romney aide…
'The only serious candidate ready to challenge to lead the Republican Party is Mitt Romney.
"Some former Romney aides were behind the recent leaks to media, including CNN, that Governor Sarah Palin was a 'diva' and was going off message intentionally."

The Palmetto Scoop reported: "One of the first stories to hit the national airwaves was
the claim of a major internal strife between close McCain aides and the folks handling his running mate Sarah Palin."
"I’m told by very good sources that this was indeed the case and that a rift had developed, but it was between Palin’s people and the staffers brought on from the failed presidential campaign of former Gov. Mitt Romney, not McCain aides."
"The sources said nearly 80 percent of Romney’s former staff was absorbed by McCain and these individuals were responsible for what amounts to a premeditated, last-minute sabotage of Palin."
… aides loyal to Romney inside the McCain campaign, said The Scoop, reportedly saw
that Palin would be a serious contender for the Republican nomination in 2012 or 2016, which made her a threat to another presidential quest by Romney.

Erick Erickson, who organized Operation Leper, said:
"These staffers are now out trying to finish her off ….hoping it would ingratiate themselves with Mitt Romney."

"Who's the Palin Leaker from the McCain Campaign?
National Review Online The publication of a Vanity Fair profile of Sarah Palin
appears to have opened old wounds in the McCain campaign.
... the source of the “Diva” leak was Nicolle Wallace’s husband."

Kathleen Parker: "[I]t is increasingly clear that Palin is a problem." "Parker ... says something publicly that many of us have thought privately
but lacked the courage to say out loud - Palin should step down:"

"Kathleen Parker: After Interviews, Palin Should Bow Out"

Kathleen Parker: "Romney would bring more than squeaky clean qualifications
and youthful good looks to the ticket.
Romney would seem a logical choice."

"Parker: Romney raised bar on freedoms"
Kathleen Parker: "If Kennedy's speech was an important landmark in American political history,
Romney's was surpassing. With heartfelt humility and poetic eloquence,
he tracked the nation's struggle with and for freedom."

Staggering bigotry of Kathleen Parker - UPDATED"

Who benefits most from Sanford meltdown? Californian (that's right) Mitt Romney

"Peeking Out From the McCain Wreckage: Mitt Romney"

"Someone's got to say it: IS MITT ROMNEY RESPONSIBLE FOR OBAMA'S VICTORY?"

"Vanity: Team Romney Sabotaged Palin and Continuing to Do So?"

"Romney Supporters Trashing Palin"

"Romney advisors sniping at Palin?"

That it hurts some people's feelings is, well, irrelevant in a nation of laws.

Tell that to the ACLU and the other a*holes who claim Christian symbols hurt peoples' feelings.