Posted on 09/21/2010 6:16:56 PM PDT by B4Ranch
VISTA - A jury on Friday convicted a Carlsbad man for forcing his wife to perform oral sex on him, but deadlocked over whether the man also raped and sodomized her.
(Excerpt) Read more at nctimes.com ...
Oh ... wait a minute ... the Clinton defense.
Andrew Dice Clay should have been the judge.
I can just hear ol bubba saying S”hut up and put that thing back in your mouth .......Monica “
Gee, what is to keep every woman from pressing such charges prior to a divorce proceeding?
He could have gotten away with it if he was muslim.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2588750/posts
Sometimes I force my wife to go to bed and leave me alone...is that illegal too?
I know what that’s like. Mine abuses me too.
Pay her to leave you alone works too.
We really should teach courses in logic in the primary grades.
It wasn’t an all-woman jury, was it?
If she had time to pull out a tape recorder she had time to run out the door. Seems she was planning more than he.
Must be something in the water.
Wisdom in your words there is.
“I mean, I can finally sleep without having to have one eye open,” said Harris
Doesn’t she mean her mouth?
As to the first question, rape is usually defined in Criminal Law as forcible vaginal intercourse, or vaginal intercourse where the victim is incapable of consent, e.g drugged, mental impairment, etc.
Non-consensual oral sex is usually charged under the various sodomy statutes.
Non-consensual oral sex is usually charged under the various sodomy statutes.
Would these be the same sodomy statues our liberal friends are removing from the books? I wonder if the liberal women are willing to be the sacrifical lambs of the gay community?
Criminal sodomy statutes usually refer to non-traditional [vaginal intercourse] sexual acts. They include oral sex, and anal sex that are non-consensual. In the original colonies and states, anal intercourse was considered sodomy, [and since males have no vaginas], such acts constituted sodomy, even if consensual.
I just wonder if those liberal groups who are pushing to get these ‘antiquated’ laws off the books realize that without them forcing a person to have non-consensual oral or anal sex will not be technically rape.
The acts will be become more difficult to procecute. Women will be hardest hit.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.