Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate Rejects GOP Proposal to Ban Earmarks
Fox News ^ | November 30, 2010 | AP

Posted on 11/30/2010 7:37:29 AM PST by So Cal Rocket

WASHINGTON -- The Senate has rejected a GOP bid to ban the practice of larding spending bills with earmarks -- those pet projects that lawmakers love to send home to their states.

Democrats and a handful of Republicans combined to defeat the effort, which would have effectively forbidden the Senate from considering legislation containing earmarks like road and bridge projects, community development funding, grants to local police departments and special-interest tax breaks.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: earmarks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

1 posted on 11/30/2010 7:37:31 AM PST by So Cal Rocket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: So Cal Rocket

Bring it to a vote again. Soon as possible.


2 posted on 11/30/2010 7:38:19 AM PST by Steely Tom (Obama goes on long after the thrill of Obama is gone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: So Cal Rocket

Name names.


3 posted on 11/30/2010 7:38:35 AM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: So Cal Rocket

Shocking! Or not.


4 posted on 11/30/2010 7:40:00 AM PST by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: So Cal Rocket

The Senate can earmare away but if the new House hold to their commitment...there will be no earmarks. Boehner has got the ball now.


5 posted on 11/30/2010 7:41:42 AM PST by harpu ( "...it's better to be hated for who you are than loved for someone you're not!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
oops...

earmare = earmark

6 posted on 11/30/2010 7:42:42 AM PST by harpu ( "...it's better to be hated for who you are than loved for someone you're not!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: So Cal Rocket

Did we expect anything less? But, the HOUSE can defund all the earmarks (if they don’t all turn into Rino’s).


7 posted on 11/30/2010 7:43:36 AM PST by blondee123 (IMPEACH THEM ALL! FREEDOMS SLIPPING AWAY DAILY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

Eight Republicans voted against the earmark ban: Bob Bennett of Utah; Thad Cochran of Mississippi, the senior Republican on the Appropriations Committee; Susan Collins of Maine; James Inhofe of Oklahoma; Lisa Murkowski of Alaska; Richard Lugar of Indiana; Richard C. Shelby of Alabama; and George V. Voinovich of Ohio.


8 posted on 11/30/2010 7:44:24 AM PST by So Cal Rocket (Task 1: Accomplished, Task 2: Hold them Accountable!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: blondee123

Roll call ?


9 posted on 11/30/2010 7:44:28 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (Impeachment !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: So Cal Rocket

Of course. They don’t get it.


10 posted on 11/30/2010 7:44:52 AM PST by b4its2late (Ignorance allows liberalism to prosper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: harpu

I like that. Earmark + Nightmare = Earmare.


11 posted on 11/30/2010 7:46:04 AM PST by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: So Cal Rocket

Thad back at the trough.


12 posted on 11/30/2010 7:46:27 AM PST by Sybeck1 (Is it proper etiquette to tip after a enhanced pat down?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

“Name names.”

Indeed...so that we can contact them!!!!!!!!


13 posted on 11/30/2010 7:47:00 AM PST by SumProVita (Cogito, ergo...Sum Pro Vita. (Modified Decartes))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: So Cal Rocket

James Inhofe of Oklahoma.

That one surprises me. Am I missing something?


14 posted on 11/30/2010 7:47:04 AM PST by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: So Cal Rocket

Repubs are secretly thrilled...


15 posted on 11/30/2010 7:47:56 AM PST by Flightdeck (If you hear me yell "Eject, Eject, Eject!" the last two will be echos...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: So Cal Rocket
handful of Republicans

Let's guess!

16 posted on 11/30/2010 7:50:33 AM PST by b4its2late (Ignorance allows liberalism to prosper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: So Cal Rocket
...but but but it only represents .5 % of total spending.

Geez, how much could that be? What's all the fuss? ...just a drop in the bucket, insignificant.

17 posted on 11/30/2010 7:53:41 AM PST by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: b4its2late

Lease-a-murkowski as usual.


18 posted on 11/30/2010 7:54:08 AM PST by sunmars
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

That rather surprises me too...

As well as the fact that apparently Snowe voted for the ban?


19 posted on 11/30/2010 7:56:21 AM PST by Svartalfiar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Svartalfiar
As well as the fact that apparently Snowe voted for the ban?

She must be worried about a potential primary challenge.

20 posted on 11/30/2010 7:57:23 AM PST by NeoCaveman (Touch my tagline and I'll have you arrested)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson