Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Leaked cables claim Kenya sent tanks to South Sudan
Daily Nation (Kenya) ^ | December 10, 2010 | KEVIN KELLY and PATRICK MAYOYO

Posted on 12/10/2010 6:51:37 PM PST by Pan_Yan

The mystery surrounding Russian-made tanks that the government denied were destined for South Sudan last year has been unravelled by a secret diplomatic cable.

A 2009 cable released by whistleblowing site WikiLeaks says a senior State Department official produced satellite images that appeared to show that the tanks unloaded in Kenya were trans-shipped to South Sudan.

The evidence contradicted claims by Kenyan officials that the hardware imported from Ukraine was intended for the Kenyan military.

A bill of lading and manifest of the hijacked MV Faina, which was seen by the Nation when the ship was released by pirates showed that its cargo consisted of more than 812 tonnes of ammunition in addition to 33 T-72 tanks from Ukraine.

Other weapons on the ship included unpacked spare parts for the T-72 tanks, Soviet-made anti-aircraft guns and rocket propelled grenades.

The Chief of General Staff, Gen Jeremiah Kianga, laid claim to the cargo insisting that the tanks and assorted arms belonged to the Kenyan military after pirates released the vessel they had captured off the coast of Somalia after ransom was reportedly paid.

However, satellite photos released by Wikileaks show that the T-72 tanks’ actual destination was in South Sudan. The photos, the cable says, were presented by a US deputy assistant secretary of state, Vann Van Diepen, during talks in the Ukrainian capital in September 2009.

The Ukrainian side is said in the document to have repeatedly insisted at the talks that the weapons were intended for the government of Kenya.

The Ukrainians stuck to that position even when Mr Van Diepen presented a copy of a contract that listed the actual recipient as the government of South Sudan.

A Ukrainian official “questioned the authenticity of the contract, and asked if the US had any better evidence,” states the cable marked “secret.”

The document dated November 9, 2009, was published on the website of London’s Guardian on Monday but a search of WikiLeaks’ own site on Tuesday did not reveal a link to the cable.

“Van Diepen, regretting that the GOU [government of Ukraine] had forced him to do so, showed the Ukrainians cleared satellite imagery of T-72 tanks unloaded in Kenya, transferred to railyards for onward shipment, and finally in South Sudan,” the Guardian’s version of the cable states. “This led to a commotion on the Ukrainian side.”

Mr Van Diepen then warned that “there was nothing for Ukraine to gain from lying and a lot to lose.”

He told the Ukrainians that the US would have to consider imposing sanctions as a result of the arms transfer to South Sudan in violation of international agreements. “A factor in US deliberations would be whether the GOU told the truth,” the document added.

The Ukrainian side still “asserted that Ukraine only had a relationship with Kenya, and did not have a relationship with South Sudan,” the cable continued. “Ukraine could not be held responsible for the actions of a third country.”

The Ukrainians however did promise to “study this situation in the light of a partner relationship so that the US knows that Ukraine is a reliable partner,” the cable said.

The document gives no indication of whether the United States raised the matter with the Kenyan government. Such a discussion might be recounted in US Nairobi embassy cables that WikiLeaks indicates it has obtained but has not yet released.

A ship carrying the weapons reached Mombasa in February 2009 after a $3.2 million ransom was paid to Somali pirates who had hijacked it five months earlier.

TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2009; 200912; 20110109; darfur; kenya; michaelranneberger; mombasa; mvfaina; obama; pirates; ranneberger; somalia; southsudan; sudan; tanks; ukraine; wikileaks
So Obama's cousin Odinga was selling tanks to his buddy Omar al-Bashir the President-Butcher of Sudan with the help of Ukraine. Oh, and the United States knew about it. The racket got busted when Somali pirates hijacked the ship carrying the tanks.
1 posted on 12/10/2010 6:51:44 PM PST by Pan_Yan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan

This wikileak stuff is great!!

2 posted on 12/10/2010 7:04:03 PM PST by Benchim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan

I’d say that sums it up.

3 posted on 12/10/2010 7:04:29 PM PST by UCANSEE2 (Lame and ill-informed post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Benchim

And apparently pirates may be our best allies in the region.

4 posted on 12/10/2010 7:05:46 PM PST by Pan_Yan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan

5 posted on 12/10/2010 7:07:03 PM PST by Diogenesis ('Freedom is the light of all sentient beings.' - Optimus Prime)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan

It says the tanks were sent to South Sudan. Are you sure they went to the Muslim butcher, and not to the Christian/animist freedom fighters in the south?

I don’t doubt that that may be the case. But the article isn’t really clear.

Kenyan government is split between its elected Christian Kikiyu President and its imposed Muslim Prime Minister, Obama’s terrorist cousin, the church burner.

6 posted on 12/10/2010 7:12:44 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan; potlatch; devolve; ntnychik; MeekOneGOP


7 posted on 12/10/2010 7:18:28 PM PST by PhilDragoo (Hussein: Islamo-Commie from Kenya)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan

Back in the mid 1980’s there were several tanks on lowboy trailers going thru Kitale, Kenya enroute to Turkana in northern Kenya and probably on to Sudan.

They had the turrets reversed and were covered with tarps.

However, a tank covered with a tarp looks like nothing else in the world other than “a tank covered with a tarp”!

Looks like nothing changes...

8 posted on 12/10/2010 7:26:46 PM PST by BwanaNdege ("a comeuppance is due the arrogant elites" - Charles Krauthammer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Benchim

Kenya has working tanks?

9 posted on 12/10/2010 7:32:01 PM PST by edcoil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
I had the John Batchelor show on in the background last night and they were breaking this story.

Since I wasn't paying close attention, I can't offer much in the way of details, but what I do remember is this was a transaction that was started under Bush. The Obama administration was not aware of it and only discovered it by accident.

There is more to this story, and I'll be interested to see how it develops.

10 posted on 12/10/2010 7:38:50 PM PST by Tex-Con-Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
Are you sure they went to the Muslim butcher, and not to the Christian/animist freedom fighters in the south?

I've been reading more and you appear to be mostly right. The tanks were for the South, which is not under the control of Omar al-Bashir's Sudanese government. Southern Sudan apparently is only 20% christian, 10% muslim and 80% animal worshipers, for lack of a better term.

According to the leaked cables, the US State Department took the arms transfers seriously when they happened, as they involved a breach of an arms embargo.

The US Ambassador to Kenya, Michael Ranneberger, threatened Kenya in December 2009 with "sweeping sanctions" if they transferred the 33 tanks and ammunition to Southern Sudan, according to the WikiLeaks cables.

However, this position "confused" the Kenyan government. The US was aware of previous, secret shipments under George W Bush, according to a Kenyan official quoted in the cables, but was strongly opposed to the latest delivery of tanks under President Barack Obama.

The MV Faina was released after five months when a $3.2m ransom was paid. The tanks, which were delivered to Mombasa and would have been transported to Southern Sudan overland were it not for the pirate attack, are reportedly still in the East African nation.

The timing of the revelation is potentially damaging as Southern Sudanese are scheduled to vote on their independence on January 9.

Bor Globe Network

11 posted on 12/10/2010 7:56:00 PM PST by Pan_Yan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson