Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: surroundedbyblue

There’s no penalty for knocking off a turncoat traitor like Specter. They use those guys up and throw them away.

Knocking off a sitting Democrat, son of a Democrat, would seem to be a different kettle of fish. I shouldn’t think the state party would be too happy about this.


3 posted on 12/19/2010 4:10:06 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Cicero

The question is which of the two would it be easier for us to unseat, Sestak or Casey.


5 posted on 12/19/2010 4:11:54 PM PST by abb ("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Cicero

“...a different kettle of fish...”

Oh yes, assuming Casey remains popular in PA, Sestak would really be wasting his time.

I’m glad he defeated Spector, Spector was a rat-fink in many ways.

Casey is of course not the man his father was, but I don’t see how Sestak gets any traction against him. Esp. considering the results of this election, it doesn’t seem Pennsy will be clamoring for more liberal reps, although that might be a wrong assessment for the dem primaries.


16 posted on 12/19/2010 6:02:03 PM PST by jocon307
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson