Carville(Democrat): "It's a feel-good story, this Romney thing.
Romney is an ascendant guy."
Romney couldn’t even beat McCain; enough said...
This would be a problem for an individual with principles, however...
Carville(Democrat): "It's a feel-good story, this Romney thing.
Romney is an ascendant guy."
Why would it be a problem, he supports abortion being available for convenience.
Evidently it took a while to take hold, because this is him speaking in 2005.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FxV-QNXoRIc
Romney’s Venue Problem
_____________________________________
No problem
No worries
Abortion king Williarde Mitt romney would have felt right at home
he was among his typ0w o9f peeps
Romney’s Venue Problem
_____________________________________
No problem
No worries
Abortion king Williarde Mitt romney would have felt right at home
he was among his typ0w o9f peeps
Romney’s Venue Problem
_____________________________________
No problem
No worries
Abortion king Williard Mitt Romney would have felt right at home
he was among his type o9f peeps
Perfect use of an old saying: “’X’ would screw up a wet dream.”
Like I’ve been saying for years, I think there is something wrong, mentally, with Milt. And I’m not joking or making fun of mentally disabled people.
There is something way off with Milt, besides the fact he’s at best, a RINO.
He should be content to count his million$, enjoy his family and take care of his wife.
If somebody wants to argue for abortion rights, they have to balance the life interest of the unborn against the indidual rights of the mother. That is a valid discussion (even if they are wrong).
But in order to argue for embryonic stem cell research, they have to balance the life interest of the unborn against some third party’s right to do experiments upon them or use a utilitarian argument that the value of the research outweighs the value of the human life destroyed.
The first argument violates the principle that my right to swing my fist ends at your nose. A third party simply has no right to end another’s life for fun or profit.
The second argument is the thin edge of the wedge that starts assigning different values to different humans based on external factors. We’ve been on this train before, and the last station on the line is Auschwitz.