I don’t feel like wadding through this stuff, but there are obvious problems with the .pdf
Segments with different pixel size. Indicating cut and paste section insertion.
Color layers and grayscale text. This would not happen if it was simply printed on security paper as it was stated.
And there are other issues.
All we get from the HI Dept. of Health are Legal Weasel Words that appear to say something, but really do not say what they imply. They lie, without lying directly.
Are some of the claims half baked, probably.
The most important issue, there is no record of where he was actually born. No hospital record. They are simply lying and making this stuff up.
Or else a scan-to-PDF converter which attempts to use a higher-res bitonal image in places where it detects that the content seems to be black text, and a lower-res color image in places where it detects color content. Splitting the document into layers allows a scanned document to be stored in less space, or for a higher-quality document to be stored in a given amount of space than would be possible otherwise.
I agree with Mr. K ! there is NO doubt the LFBC is a criminal fraud, a forgery.
...but, i also agree with Texas Fossil, i don’t want to wade through that either.
i am not a techie. and i am grateful to Dr Corsi, for preventing “President Kerry”.
...but “Da Vinci Code” “ghosts” ?!?!?!? is this a joke?
this will make people take “birthers” seriously?
( ref: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2723478/posts )
there are many good people here on FR,
that have put in hundreds of hours of hard work,
Butterdezillion, ml/nj, bluecat6, Red Steel, and others.
They have found VERY clear, obvious evidence of forgery.
that is very easy to see (a simple picture is worth a thousand words, especially if you want respect and credibility in the mainstream!)
...WHY can’t Dr Corsi use these, intead of the “mystical artifacts” and “Da Vinci ghosts”, which even if true, look ridiculous? the “smiley face” reminds me of the fake “face” on the moon. it may be real, but it could easily be a graphics artifact. why not stick to REAL, CLEAR, OBVIOUS evidence of fraud like these?
again, i am not a techie... i don’t understand adobe, or layers, so i don’t wade though that.
but, even to a non-techie, these are slam-dunks.
these are things i can show quickly to a coworker or relative, an ordinary American, and have them see the fraud immediately:
1) the photocopy curve from the book, is legitimate and expected. but, how can adjacent words not curve?
(they must have been typed in, onto the template. absolute evidence of forgery.)
http://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=186343
2) signatures can’t be in different resolutions on the same document, unless one of them was pasted. ( ml/nj has it here):
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2720608/posts?page=23#23
3) boxes that are identical down to the pixel? :
http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/05/irrefutable-proof-obamas-new-birth.html
4) why do other documents show the security paper background as they are supposed to, but this one LFBC doesn’t? What is the purpose of security paper? to reveal tapering !!!
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2722377/posts?page=259#259
5) why does Hawaii list a birth for Virginia Sunahara in their index, and then claim they have no record of her?
http://butterdezillion.wordpress.com/2011/05/19/hdoh-funny-business-regarding-virginia-sunahara/
...and the biggest yet simplest question:
6) WHY does he have a Connecticut SSN ?
it is -impossible- for someone from Hawaii, who never lived in Connecticut. Not even the trolls on FR give a legitimate explanation for this. it’s criminal fraud.
Mr K is absolutely correct! “we need to pubicize this until he is forced to”. But to get ANY traction now, after Trump, it must be short, simple, irrefutable questions. like:
WHY do you have a CT SSN ???
That is how I am reading it, too.