Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gun trafficking as compared to William Newell's definition of 'gunwalking'
St. Louis Gun Rights Examiner ^ | 29 July, 2011 | Kurt Hofmann

Posted on 07/30/2011 5:41:36 AM PDT by marktwain

In discussing "Project Gunwalker," this column tries to observe the perhaps small (but nevertheless important) distinction between directly trafficking guns, and "walking" them. That's why readers will find instance after instance of reference being made here to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives' (BATFE's) "facilitating the trafficking" of guns. Basically, the accusation being made here is not that the BATFE directly trafficked the guns. Instead, they strongly pressured gun dealers into proceeding with sales those dealers would otherwise never have touched, because of the obviously nefarious intent on the part of the purchasers.

In Tuesday's House Oversight and Government Reform Committee hearing regarding the BATFE's "Operation Fast and Furious," former BATFE Phoenix field division Special Agent in Charge William Newell repeatedly made the startling statement that he believed no guns were "walked" during the operation. The reason, of course, that this statement was startling is that we already know that more than 2,000 guns were "walked," with perhaps 1,700 or more still unaccounted for.

Even Representative Elijah Cummings (D-MD), although a frequent BATFE apologist and enthusiastic supporter of "gun control," seemed more than a little taken aback by Newell's denial, and eventually thought to ask for Newell's definition of "gun walking." The Daily Caller has the quote for us:

“My definition of walking, and I believe it’s a common law enforcement term, is when a law enforcement agency, whether it be DEA or a state or local agency, actually puts some sort of evidence into the hands of a suspect in an undercover operation or an investigation and, for instance, with the ATF it could be one of our prop guns, and then don’t follow up where that is going,” Newell said, adding that he believed his definition of “walking” guns did not happen in Operation Fast

(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: atf; banglist; castaway; cia; dea; dhs; doj; fastandfurious; fbi; gunrunner; gunwalker; holder; ice; newell; obama
All the other ATF agents disagree. It kind of depends on what the definition of is is.
1 posted on 07/30/2011 5:41:42 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MestaMachine

Gunwalker ping.


2 posted on 07/30/2011 5:42:30 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vette6387; MetaThought; 60Gunner; XHogPilot; FreedomPoster; Josephat; Prince of Space; ...

FOR REFERENCE:

DAVID CODREA'S PROJECT GUNWALKER

A Journalist's guide to 'Project Gunwalker'-Part One

A Journalist's Guide to 'Project Gunwalker'-Part Two

A Journalist's Guide to 'Project Gunwalker'-Part Three

A Journalist's Guide to 'Project Gunwalker'-Part Four

FULL TRANSCRIPT OF JULY 26 GUNWALKER HEARING & VIDEO


3 posted on 07/30/2011 5:52:33 AM PDT by MestaMachine (Guns don't kill people, the obama administration does. (Gunwalker Ping List))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

“Fast & Furious” Hearings Raise More Questions Than Answers

Friday, July 29, 2011

The more information that comes out about the reckless “Fast and Furious” gun running operation conducted by the Phoenix BATFE office, the more clear it seems that knowledge of the operation, and approval for it, went a lot higher than the Phoenix field office, or even the BATFE.

There is now clear evidence, uncovered by the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee headed by Chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) that senior Obama Administration officials were aware of this disastrous operation.

Last Tuesday, Rep. Issa conducted another round of hearings. Among those who testified were William Newell and William McMahon, BATFE Special Agents who oversaw the program in Phoenix. Those hearings revealed that senior Dept. of Justice officials, including former Deputy Attorney General David Ogden and Assistant Attorney General Lanny Breuer, knew about the program.

Additionally, other federal agencies were identified as having been made aware of the operation, including the IRS, DEA and ICE.

The Committee also heard testimony from four BATFE agents stationed in Mexico during the time “Fast and Furious” was in operation. All testified they knew nothing of this scheme, in spite of promises from Obama Administration officials, and Obama himself to share all relevant information with Mexican authorities engaged in the fight against the drug cartels.

When asked about the operation, these BATFE agents described it as absurd and ill-conceived, and declared that it was not consistent with established BATFE procedures or methods.

One of the biggest bombshells to come out of the hearing was the revelation that Agent Newell had sent an e-mail, under the subject line “You did not hear this from me,” to Kevin O’Reilly, the National Security Director for North America. That e-mail, dated Sept. 2010, included information about “Fast and Furious.”

After repeated questioning, Newell admitted he had spoken to O’Reilly about the operation.

This revelation, that a senior White House official knew about the program, combined with the senior DOJ officials listed above, casts serious doubts on claims by Attorney General Holder and even President Obama that they knew nothing about “Fast and Furious.”

As more is learned about the “Fast and Furious” operation, two serious questions come to the forefront: Did BATFE abandon standard procedures and methods in this project in order to achieve the political goal of making U.S. gun laws the issue in the war against the Mexican drug cartels? And if so, was it the BATFE that proposed and advanced the scheme, or was it senior political appointees in the Obama administration who wanted to “prove” that it is American gun freedoms that are “causing” the violence in Mexico? Stay tuned for more as details continue to emerge.

http://www.nraila.org/Legislation/Federal/Read.aspx?id=7011


4 posted on 07/30/2011 10:48:02 AM PDT by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
""facilitating the trafficking""

That sounds to me like "aiding and abetting", which makes one guilty of that offense a part of the specified criminal act.

ATF is criminally GUILTYI!

5 posted on 07/30/2011 4:43:30 PM PDT by TXnMA (There is no Constitutional right to NOT be offended.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson