Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Top senators open to changes in military health (McCain Alert)
AP ^ | 2011-10-14 | Donna Cassata

Posted on 10/15/2011 9:18:43 AM PDT by rabscuttle385

The top lawmakers on the Senate’s defense panel on Friday recommended that a special committee searching for ways to slash the deficit consider some of President Barack Obama’s proposed changes to health and retirement benefits for the military.

In separate letters to the bipartisan panel, Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich., chairman of the Armed Services Committee, and Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., signaled they were open to cost-saving steps in military benefits, recommendations that have already attracted fierce opposition from powerful groups of retired officers and veterans resistant to change.

(Excerpt) Read more at articles.boston.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; US: Arizona; US: Michigan
KEYWORDS: 112th; bho44; biggovernment; debt; deficitreduction; fees; healthcare; levin; mccain; mccain2makeupay; mccain4obama; mccain4taxes; mccaindeathpanels; mccaintruthfile; mcdemocrat; military; obamacare; obamacare4military; obamacare4veterans; obamadeathpanels; rino; supercommitteee; taxes; traitor; tricare; unconstitutional
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

1 posted on 10/15/2011 9:18:47 AM PDT by rabscuttle385
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Somebody please admit both of these SOBS into a nursing home.


2 posted on 10/15/2011 9:20:23 AM PDT by ohioman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Wonder if it is possible to recall this pos. Sooner rather than later.


3 posted on 10/15/2011 9:22:26 AM PDT by MestaMachine (obama kills)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385
Perhaps Levin and McCain should consider making cost savings in the entirety of Congress as it directly relates to their own pay, health insurance, pensions, etc. first..... =.=
4 posted on 10/15/2011 9:23:33 AM PDT by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Hell, no. I will vote against any politician who does not support full payment of the agreement made to the US military regarding the repayment of what was always described as deferred pay and benefits.

Republican, Dem, Libertarian, etc. - if you go against the veterans or the retirees I will not support you.


5 posted on 10/15/2011 9:23:50 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! True Supporters of our Troops PRAY for their VICTORY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385
...some of President Barack Obama’s proposed changes to health and retirement benefits for the military.

Look for the maggots down at the AARP to start running TV ads making it sound like it is ONLY the Republicans who are doing this.

6 posted on 10/15/2011 9:25:44 AM PDT by FlingWingFlyer ("Greed" is wanting everything and demanding that somebody else pay for it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

We have way too much incompetent and careless government.
They are sooooo out of touch with reality. The Beltway is the logic-free zone!


7 posted on 10/15/2011 9:26:05 AM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Why don’t these pos senators lead by example by slashing Senators and Reps pay, benefits, and pensions first before they go after anything else.


8 posted on 10/15/2011 9:26:10 AM PDT by TMA62 (Al Sharpton - The North Korea of race relations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

“The Pentagon’s health care costs have skyrocketed from $19 billion in 2001 to $53 billion...”

I wonder how much of that goes to helping our service members who’ve had limbs blown off or burns over 75% of their body.

I guess a dead soldier is cheaper than a wounded one.

JERKS.

THEY sent our guys to war. THEY put them in harms way.

Now THEY don’t want to pay for it.

Yeah, McCain is really all about supporting our troops...

WHAT A JERK.


9 posted on 10/15/2011 9:28:03 AM PDT by Marie (Cain 9s Have Teeth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marie

I agree with you 100%.

It appears to me that we have to cut spending on those who have actually given something for their country so we have money to support the losers on all forms of public assistance who have done NOTHING to deserve it, but pop out babies and give up on taking care of themselves.


10 posted on 10/15/2011 9:35:46 AM PDT by kevslisababy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385
So to all those who lectured us on respecting McCain's service as a primary reason for his re-election,

(insert favorite raspberry sound clip here)

And with the predicted flaming arrows headed my way for doing so, ITS AN ANOLOGY! Deal with it.

I respect his service at the time but I prefer to evaluate a man for his overall qualifications as I would to someone like Benedict Arnold who himself was a decorated war hero before embarking on his desire for "seven pieces of silver".

From the beginning, and even before, of his 2008 candidacy, this hero has been the gift that keeps giving to the Obama administration.

11 posted on 10/15/2011 9:39:54 AM PDT by mazda77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

I’m open to changes to the congressional medical plans. Let them have the same plan we have!


12 posted on 10/15/2011 9:42:56 AM PDT by Keen-Minded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mazda77

I respect his service at the time but I prefer to evaluate a man for his overall qualifications as I would to someone like Benedict Arnold who himself was a decorated war hero before embarking on his desire for “seven pieces of silver”.

I would so much like to use that for a tag line.


13 posted on 10/15/2011 9:44:27 AM PDT by fudimo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Great. After they’re done, even FEWER physicians will take Tricare than do already. I already have to drive 30 miles to see my primary care provider and he’s told me he loses $$ on Tricare patients. Only does it out of a sense of patriotism — G-d bless him.


14 posted on 10/15/2011 9:55:15 AM PDT by rbg81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

TriCare is fairly well-run, better than Medicare for return-on-investment. The VA hospital/healthcare network, not so much.


15 posted on 10/15/2011 10:16:40 AM PDT by StAnDeliver (/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

What kind of person who call himself an American would even suggest cutting medical for the military while they are handing out free medical to illegals and able bodied moochers by the millions.

I know of quite a few able bodied young men and women who have connived their way on to disability and free medical because of overeating, drugs, alcohol, “bad back”, etc.


16 posted on 10/15/2011 10:27:17 AM PDT by Iron Munro (Obama's secret: "Once you learn to fake sincerity you've got it made")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rbg81

If I understand the rules correctly, any physician that accepts Medicare must, by law, accept Tricare.


17 posted on 10/15/2011 10:32:39 AM PDT by ops33 (Senior Master Sergeant, USAF (Retired))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ops33

Got this from the Army Times - “That rule says that a hospital that accepts Medicare patients is required by law to accept Tricare patients also.
That rule does not apply to individual professional providers, such as physicians.”
http://militarytimes.com/blogs/tricarehelp/tag/doctor/


18 posted on 10/15/2011 10:45:03 AM PDT by exbrit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385
Today I read what racebater jackson junior had to say about the congress not obeying the president. I have been watching the mob tear up different cities and wondering when the rule of law would be applied to them.
Now I read this BS. I am retired military. To be more precise I am a retired disabled vet. I was involved in every pissing contest from Nam to Mogadishu.
The liberals really need to step back and remember a few facts first among them that all of us retired military folks have been well trained in the arts of war.
Several generations of veterans fought against Socialism and now we have one of them as president and a lot of the pukes in our congress. I guess we didn't do a good enough job or maybe that job just isn't finished yet.
This week the word came out that our traitor in chief just sent a hundred special forces troops to Africa to hunt down and kill Christians in support of muslim fanatics and murderers.
When TSHTF and they come for us vets, they will need a lot more than local law enforcement to deal with us.
I served my time under a contract that clearly defined my retirement and medical coverage. Now these F-heads want to change it.
The day they try this one is the day TSHTF. There are many millions of us vets who are up for another round or two. So Be It!
19 posted on 10/15/2011 10:46:44 AM PDT by oldenuff2no (Rangers lead the way...... Delta, the original European home land security)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Top senators open to changes in military health. This translates to, McCain got his, now all others can go screw off.


20 posted on 10/15/2011 11:29:55 AM PDT by JimC214
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson