Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'World News' Political Insights: Money Race Points to Two-Man GOP Race (Romney, Perry)
ABC News ^ | Oct 16, 2011 | RICK KLEIN

Posted on 10/16/2011 6:14:15 PM PDT by Clairity

Fundraising figures released over the weekend demonstrate that only two Republican candidates -- Mitt Romney and Rick Perry -- enter the dash to the nomination with both the financial support and the campaign infrastructure that equip them fully to compete.

And the Obama campaign -- eager to ensure that no candidates get free rides in the primaries -- has already begun making assumptions about whom President Obama is likely to face in the general election. That means Romney is coming under pressure from both sides, even as he seeks to consolidate Republican support early in the process.

Before we get there, Romney and Perry remain the frontrunners for the nomination. One of them remains overwhelmingly likely to secure the GOP nod.

The other candidates -- led by Herman Cain, whose burst in the polls has been the story of the last week -- have nowhere near the combination of fundraising muscle and on-the-ground activists that Perry and Romney have.

(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: amnesty; cain; heartless; instatetuition; openborders4all; perry; perry4illegals; perrycare; perrywinkles; rinoperry; rinoromney; romney; romneycare; rovianpuppets; wishfuljournolism; worldnews4rove
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
To: RichInOC

Not HAVING money, spending it in a political ad campaign. C’mon, be serious.


41 posted on 10/16/2011 7:11:23 PM PDT by magritte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Usually_Disappointed

I feel your pain. The Palin supporters, who currently support Cain, soured me on both of them.


42 posted on 10/16/2011 7:14:02 PM PDT by magritte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Clairity
There is a strong correlation between funds raised, organization on the ground and chances of winning.

Horse manure. In 2008, Mike Huckabee had bupkis. He won Iowa. In 2008, John McCain ran his campaign out of money and was broke. He won New Hampshire, SC and FL.

Slick Willard was throwing money at all of those contests. He lost them all. His band of useless idiots were spouting the exact same crap you are now, slinging mud at every conservative they could, just like you guys.

Mike Huckabee used a network of churches in Iowa to win. Bachmann was trying to duplicate this, but if you look back at articles from a few months ago, I recall reading that she was running into resistance because they were interested in Herman Cain. I'll be they are just a touch more interested now.

Perry is finished. You people who stubbornly focus on the phony, stuttering, corrupt, imbecile from Texas are going to make it much harder to beat Romney. Get behind a VIABLE candidate and stop doing Mitt Romney and Obama's work for them.

43 posted on 10/16/2011 7:16:37 PM PDT by perfect_rovian_storm (Perry's idea of border control: Use both hands to welcome the illegals right in)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: perfect_rovian_storm
phony, stuttering, corrupt, imbecile from Texas

The Perrybots' argument boils down to this: Only our phony, stuttering, corrupt imbecile can beat their phony, stuttering, corrupt, imbecile [0bama]. "Anybody can see that"--Clairity

44 posted on 10/16/2011 7:27:50 PM PDT by hellbender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: hellbender

Indeed. And I say we vote no on ALL phony, stuttering, corrupt imbeciles in 2012!!! :)


45 posted on 10/16/2011 7:29:37 PM PDT by perfect_rovian_storm (Perry's idea of border control: Use both hands to welcome the illegals right in)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: BobL

LOLOL! Nice. Well-played.


46 posted on 10/16/2011 7:35:01 PM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Clairity
As anyone can see, if you don't support Perry, you will get Romney.

Equine feces.

So, you think we should fall in line with whoever has the biggest corporate donors? So apparently you think we should all vote for Obama.

I think you know what you can do with that line of thinking.

47 posted on 10/16/2011 7:42:11 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (There are people in power who belong in jail.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clairity

The burn rate of Romney and Cain is interesting.
Romney went through 12 million to build “ out a campaign staff and infrastructure in all the early-voting states.”

Cain ended the July-to-September quarter with $1.3 million available in the bank for the primary fight.
Including a $ 173,000 personal loan to his campaign this quarter
and a $500,000 personal loan last quarter.
He spent nearly $2 million.
FTA “ The money he has spent has been used to build almost no campaign apparatus to speak of.”
Obama has raised 70 million, so far.

Not mentioned in the article are the Romney , Perry and Obama Super PACs and they will also raise a ton of money.


48 posted on 10/16/2011 7:47:36 PM PDT by Wild Irish Rogue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wild Irish Rogue
In truth, the real election and campaign season has not really begun yet.

These early debates are a lot of fun, especially watching all the early prophets making all these ridiculous claims about how the election is going to unfold.

Cain has about as much chance of winning as do the other inexperienced and grossly underfunded wannabees that are stuck below 5%. Cain is way too inexperienced to organize something he is not suited to master in just a few short weeks.

The money train is what determines the most voter support. The polls are for losers. Cain will make a fool of himself eventually and already has in the recent weekend interviews. He is rapidly being labeled as a loose cannon while he unknowingly shoots his mouth off with radical and outlandish claims about the Wall Street Protesters, the border, Mexicans, etc.

American politics does not play well to the radical Right or Left. Like Reagan, one must learn how to be tactful and not come across as an extremist. Reagan was a master in the art of connecting with both sides of the isle and at the same time, make his ideology sound appealing and worth voting for.

Cain just does not have a clue on how to go about that tactic. He has already turned off a lot of regular Americans with his recent, outlandish statements.

49 posted on 10/16/2011 8:04:08 PM PDT by PSYCHO-FREEP (If you come to a fork in the road, take it........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Clairity

Romney will get us Obama.

Perry will likely get use Obama also.


50 posted on 10/16/2011 8:37:22 PM PDT by W. W. SMITH (Obama is an instrument of enslavement)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: W. W. SMITH

Never underestimate Rick Perry. His strongest showing is about to become a reality.


51 posted on 10/16/2011 8:42:36 PM PDT by PSYCHO-FREEP (If you come to a fork in the road, take it........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Clairity; smoothsailing; shield; mylife

As anyone can see, if you don’t support Perry, you will get Romney. And if Romney is the GOP nominee, you will get Obama.
This is not “wishful thinking”, this is reality.

**********************************************

You are exactly right!

And the more we learn about Romney....the more he resembles Obama. He insisted on the individual mandate in Romney Care which gave Obama the same approach in ObamaCare.

And he’s on tape saying that believes in man-made global warming. Gore praised Romney for that statement.

If we want a real conservative, who believes in the 10th Amendment; who has the ability to raise money to counter Obama’s Campaign Billions; a campaign organization in place ready to go, executive experience and a proven record of job creation....Perry is the logical choice!


52 posted on 10/16/2011 9:00:23 PM PDT by JulieRNR21 (*OMG ........means Obama Must Go in 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clairity

Two rinos leading the fund raising because there are simply too many people who believe they MUST vote for the “R” candidate regardless of his record.


53 posted on 10/16/2011 9:07:36 PM PDT by Terry Mross (I'll only vote for a SECOND party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clairity

I’ve been watching Intrade this weekend. Perry keeps edging upward while Cain keeps slipping further down. Should be interesting to see what happens this week.


54 posted on 10/16/2011 9:20:16 PM PDT by casinva (Federal entitlements through enterprise and empowerment zones are NOT conservative!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999
We got a little insight into Mr. Cain’s foreign policy thinking on the NBC Meet the Press interview. He likes Kissinger and likes to read George Will and Krauthammer as his policy experts.

Yikes! Globalist-elitist-country club establishment-neocons. No wonder Cain likes Romney so much.

55 posted on 10/16/2011 9:33:25 PM PDT by alicewonders
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: lonestar
You don't speak for the Tea Party...I know a lot of Tea Party members who are voting for Perry.

True that! I would think a whole lot of Tea Party members would choose Perry's fiscal conservatism and small government principles in lieu of Cain's newly-announced 999 embedded entitlements for low income minorities through the use of federal enterprise and empowerment zones.

56 posted on 10/16/2011 9:50:31 PM PDT by casinva (Expanded federal entitlements through enterprise and empowerment zones are NOT conservative!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009

And for some, polls matter more than fiscal conservatism.


57 posted on 10/16/2011 9:53:56 PM PDT by casinva (Expanded federal entitlements through enterprise and empowerment zones are NOT conservative!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Clairity
Between these two Rino's it would be easier for a conservative congress to hold Perry in check on amnesty than it would be to hold Romney in check on global warming, obamacare/romneycare, etc..

Perry really needs to do a crash course on debating though to win the nomination.

58 posted on 10/16/2011 10:44:08 PM PDT by Mogollon (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God. -- Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clairity

Yeah right and how do you explain Cain’s rise?

Could it possibly be because people are abandoning the Perry camp?

Look Romney is the clear Liberal and who would lose against Obama.

The choice should really be between Perry and Cain. That way no matter what... We get a conservative. Our country cannot handle another Liberal flip flopping Republican.


59 posted on 10/17/2011 1:12:59 AM PDT by Sprite518
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Interesting Times

Ahem. Who raised the most money in the last presidential election?

And who won?

Think about that...


60 posted on 10/17/2011 12:10:47 PM PDT by gogogodzilla (Live free or die!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson